Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Every capacity purchase agreement with regional airlines includes deadheading. You regionals have to be able to position crews to operate flights for your airline.
Every capacity purchase agreement with regional airlines includes deadheading. You regionals have to be able to position crews to operate flights for your airline.
FWIW, I have seen the AD that requires the Barbie Jet to carry a ton (actually 2-3) of extra fuel if alternates are needed. Also there is a 6000 lb difference between takeoff and landing weights. I'd bet that the good ol' CRJ can't carry a full load of pax and bag to MSN or GRB if alternates are required. It's no so far fetched to see that they are weight restricted. Thank goodness DR and TH got rid of those nasty 328s and 1900s.
I just finished a 3 day with a guy who was accusing me of being unfair in trying to spread the word about passing the furlough assessment and getting the % only in our merger assessment, believe me it was not your ideal 3 day trip.
isn't MCI a skywest domicile or is it a mx base?
I am sure they would happily fly 88 seat 900's if TH called upon them to do so. If it's one thing PCL_128 and I agree on, get rid of regional jets period. I would love to see the proposed APA scope language be put into our contract.
You better watch out. TH probably stalks FI for all of his great business ideas!
As for "regional" flying, that is one thing I loved about the Beech at Skyway. It was true regional flying. Now the "Replacement Jets" label seems more appropriate.
You better watch out. TH probably stalks FI for all of his great business ideas!![]()
Moving deadheading crewmembers around is a cost of doing business. They should receive a comfortable seat.
what was his/her problem with the % merger assessment?
The MKE-BDL, IAD, BWI, EWR, PHL flying on the 328 wasn't so "regional." But you are correct, 90% of it was truly regional and a lot of fun.
I used to have the same thinking when I was at Piedmont about deadheading... But, at Midwest we have to look at it differently. If you are deadheading, you are ON DUTY!!! This is not nappy time... If the company asks you to occupy a jumpseat to free up an available revenue seat you had better pony up. We are too small of an airline to be harda$$'s. Every pax we fly is important when all we have is our reputation keeping our passengers faithful to Midwest. Our company will not force us to use a jumpseat, they don't have to, we will do it on our own... 8
His problem is that he couldn't vote on the merger assessment because he was flying and he would have voted against the % only, he thinks it was totally unfair and he asked me about the % of Capt vs FO present at the meeting, I told him I have no idea but it passed 50 to 7.
When we talked about the furlough help my blood pressure was getting way too high from what I am hearing, long story short, he will vote against the furlough assessment if its out for a member vote, so here is a capt who makes $155 an hour refusing to help, just a typical A$$Ho$$.
BEEEEECCHHH...MBL, MSN, RHI, IWD -- Good stuff, Maynard!
Yea, that East Coast stuff...I dunno. Anytime you have to make a fuel stop coming back west you have issues. FWIW, Airtran fills a 737 early on a Sunday morning going from BWI to MKE (and then to Vegas). If they can fill that, why only a 32 (or 50) seater at 10:30a? Too bad YX doesn't have a Vegas flight these people can get on. Hold it...![]()
i highly doubt our management is willing to foot the bill for lease payments on a b738 and a319 which are in the neighborhood of 430,000 to 390,000 respectively. (that would mean better utilization of a/c in order to cover payments and make a profit than what we're currently doing.)Hey Timmayyy here's an idea. There are airplanes out there (ATA 737-8's and Skybus A319's). Let's replace the MD80's and grow. Make Milwaukee the cultural center of the world and we can be it's hometown airline!
What?!?! Oh yeah, shrink to profitability (more like shrink to management's ability).
i highly doubt our management is willing to foot the bill for lease payments on a b738 and a319 which are in the neighborhood of 430,000 to 390,000 respectively. (that would mean better utilization of a/c in order to cover payments and make a profit than what we're currently doing.)
i do remember reading somewhere that qantas link parked 13 b712's. thats always a possiblity if the brain factory was actually thinking.
you have to spend money to make money.
Suit yourself. It'd be a cold day in hell before I sat in an FA jumpseat while on company business, though.
i highly doubt our management is willing to foot the bill for lease payments on a b738 and a319 which are in the neighborhood of 430,000 to 390,000 respectively. (that would mean better utilization of a/c in order to cover payments and make a profit than what we're currently doing.)
i do remember reading somewhere that qantas link parked 13 b712's. thats always a possiblity if the brain factory was actually thinking.
Suit yourself. It'd be a cold day in hell before I sat in an FA jumpseat while on company business, though.
I have been denied the j/s on skywest from CLT-MKE for "balance" purposes even though we were still 3000# from max t/o wt. Then the bastards had the nerve to add 1000# of ballast to an relatively empty baggage (the CA said they only had 600# in there) area to bring them in balance. I guess the 1yr wonder didn't think of adding more ballast to get a fellow crewmember home. The AirWhiskey guy who was there and didn't get on said he HATED j/s on SkyWest for this very reason as he could never remember having problems on AirWhiskey's 200's. I am glad I haven't commuted since 2004 as I do not miss crossing the fingers on every other leg home.
So if you had a buddy who was returning home with his wife, you wouldn't take a FA jumpseat to get her on?
For the record, every time I was asked to ride in a FA jumpseat, it was to get an off line Crewmember in the cockpit, or a non rev on. I have no problem with that.
So if you had a buddy who was returning home with his wife, you wouldn't take a FA jumpseat to get her on?
For the record, every time I was asked to ride in a FA jumpseat, it was to get an off line Crewmember in the cockpit, or a non rev on. I have no problem with that.
I've got no problem with helping out nonrevs. I won't take a jumpseat to allow a paying passenger a seat while I sit on an FA jumpseat while on company business, however. The loss of that passenger revenue is simply a cost of doing business to the company.
I don't like it, but we need all the paying pax we can get at MEH. At least you can avoid sitting next to some 350 pound freak that hasn't bathed in a week.