Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

King air systems

  • Thread starter Thread starter AJL5236
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 10

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

AJL5236

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 6, 2002
Posts
112
Just wondering if anyone out there has flown the King air 90 and 200 and also the Beech 1900. I have just accepted a job flying the King Air's and want to get a head start on the systems of the airplanes. However I only have a beech 1900 manual. How similar are the systems? Should I even bother, or will it just confuse me. Thanks everyone for the input.
 
well, im current in all but the 1900. i would say that it depends...

is the training in house? how are they going to go about checking you out in two types? do one now and add the other later? is this PIC or SIC?

...looking at your time im guessing SIC, so id say not to confuse yourself, but without more info, im only guessing ;)
 
AJL5236 said:
Just wondering if anyone out there has flown the King air 90 and 200 and also the Beech 1900. I have just accepted a job flying the King Air's and want to get a head start on the systems of the airplanes. However I only have a beech 1900 manual. How similar are the systems? Should I even bother, or will it just confuse me. Thanks everyone for the input.

congrats. where is the job? i've had ground school and flown the 200 a little, but i cant compare it to a 1900. are they hiring anymore? the little expierience i had in the king air was awesome.
 
The systems on the King Airs are very similar.

The F-90's systems is a triple fed bus, while the B-200 is a dual fed bus.
You can do a cross generator start in the F-90, but will blow a current limiter in the B-200 with the same start.

The F-90 uses a "HED" to monitor and control voltage and the B-200 uses "Current Limiters."

The prop systems are also slightly different. Reverse can malfunction on 4 bladed F-90's and cause you a lot of grief on landing.

The B-200 has a cowl deice/anti-ice that uses continuous bleed air. The F-90 has a screwy rubber boot with electrical wires that heat up; Not good.

There's more but you get the idea.
 
Need more info...
If it is a newer 90 (c90) the electrical system is identical to the 1900. The 200 is a different system. the above post bout the cross start is not correct for a B200, just the older "straight" 200s.

If you want to get a head start, start with the pressurization stuff, powerplants (variations of the PT-6, -21,-42,-67) flight controls will be very similar, fuel systems (minor differences), Air Conditioning. Hydraulics will be entirely dependent upon which model of 90 and 200 you will be responsible for.

Another good word of advice: When learning any new airplane, the best way to stay ahead is to make some flash cards with the limitations and emergency procedures. Sit in the cockpit and touch the switches as you go through the memory items to familiarize yourself with the locations of the items and systems. That alone will keep you on track.

Hope it helps. I'd be happy to answer any specific questions you may have. I have very little experience with the older models, but I can help with the c90, b200, 300,350,1900...
 
lol...got all that AJL??? K.I.S.S. and ask the company what they would like you to study :)

and as for the rest of you yahoos...bonus points to the person that can identify exactly what allows a cross gen start on some 200's and not on others.

extra credit for the easiest way to tell if it has this capability when you crawl into the cockpit for the first time :D
 
It is called a HALL EFFECT DEVICE, and was started somewhere around BB-1500. It limits the cross generator output.

I was instructor and check airmen on the c90-b, f-90, and 200. (That is not an ego trip, just an offer to help)

Newer B-200's are awesone. I used to get 290KTS on a regular basis.

PM be and I will give you an oral prep sheet I made. It has brief systems discriptions, memory items and limitations.

I loved all the King Airs except the straight 100.

400A
 
thanks...

Thank you everyone for the input. I will be going to Flight safety in Atlanta for training and because I meet 135 minimums doing the PIC check. I will be flying in a two pilot crew and am looking to get a head start before I receive any manuals. Once again thanks..
 
Good for you! Their sim in ATL is a B200 with EFIS 84 and an UNS1-K. If it is similar to the 200 you'll be flying, it will be a nice new one. FSI Atlanta is pretty good, I recommend the Westin...
 
400A said:
Newer B-200's are awesone. I used to get 290KTS on a regular basis.
Me too, but my buddies in the Conquest's never believed me.:)

AJL5236- Congrats on the job!
 
Originally Posted by 400A
I loved all the King Airs except the straight 100.
400A



That's because he never flew a B-100 with dash 10's. Whole new ballgame.
Most bang for the buck.
 
Yep

Kingairrick said:
Good for you! Their sim in ATL is a B200 with EFIS 84 and an UNS1-K. If it is similar to the 200 you'll be flying, it will be a nice new one. FSI Atlanta is pretty good, I recommend the Westin...

Sim is based off of BB-1647 and is level D. BB-1647 was an awsome machine. I flew her the first 2 years of her life. Most reliable bird I ever flew. The pictures in class of the collins flight deck will be of that aircraft. Taken by one of their instructors named Charlie Kilmer.
 
B-100

B
Hung Start said:
Originally Posted by 400A
I loved all the King Airs except the straight 100.
400A


That's because he never flew a B-100 with dash 10's. Whole new ballgame.
Most bang for the buck.

I never liked the 331's over the pratts. It was faster, but the 331's while easier on gas are impossible to budget for MX and NTS sux compared to autofeather.

The aircraft was only built because pratt was on strike.

The 100 body was to big for its wing. even with the -10's while fast, still does not do altitude well. I also never liked the stabilator. I had a run away with it at rotation....handfull.
 
AJL5236 said:
Thank you everyone for the input. I will be going to Flight safety in Atlanta for training and because I meet 135 minimums doing the PIC check. I will be flying in a two pilot crew and am looking to get a head start before I receive any manuals. Once again thanks..

FlightSafety will sometimes provide their training manuals ahead of time, so their clients can study up before they actually arrive in class. This may vary from Center to Center, and it may require you to do a little "sweet-talking" to someone; but it could be worth the effort.
 
You want a real king air try a 65-90. They didn't know where to put half the switches so they just scattered them throught the cockpit on the fo's side because that's who used to flip all the switches.

The real question is what does lj, or bb really stand for.
 
msw said:
FlightSafety will sometimes provide their training manuals ahead of time, so their clients can study up before they actually arrive in class. This may vary from Center to Center, and it may require you to do a little "sweet-talking" to someone; but it could be worth the effort.
Good point! The manuals are on CD/ROM now and if you call the center, ask for the King Air program manager. Tell him you will be comiing to school on x date, and he'll send you the CDs.
 
kingairrick...hmm you wouldnt happen tohave copied those disks by chance?
<<<would love to get a copy.....for a poor ole broke flight instructor(trying to get into more and faster A/c and basic knowledge would be great:) )
 
It copyrighted stuff. My company is very serious about the rules concering that. Sorry.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top