Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

King Air C90GT ?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
no new avionics for awhile and the 135s burn more fuel down low but should get you to altitude faster and since it is a faster and higher aircraft the range should be the same as salem said
only with the pro line do you not need the inverters
 
you'd think it was that way but it isn't. I know we shortened a trip we've done for 13 years by an hour but we are a lot tighter on fuel when we get there.

So it's not like we are now going farther because we are going faster. We are doing our same trip time and time again but the high fuel burns down low can really kill you. I just end up flying 300lbs a side till we can really climb. NY airspace just likes to keep you down.

Once you get to altitude you're hummin but then again now you're dealing with stronger headwinds.

It just takes a different type of flying than you were used to with the old engines.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top