Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

KGMB Hawaii blows the lid on Mesa / go! and pilot fatigue!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

Hikoushi

AAAAAAARGGGH!!!!
Joined
Sep 14, 2005
Posts
64
http://kgmb9.com/main/content/view/4441/40/

They say it happens more than you realize. Pilots tell us they're so exhausted they fall asleep at the controls. Now, there's more proof and more controversy.

While federal investigators haven't determined if that was the case, people in the airline industry nationwide are talking about it and telling us about it.
KGMB9's Stacy Loe first broke the story and continues her investigation.

Since our story aired, I've received more than 50 e-mails from pilots across the country.
Many claim to be current or former Mesa airlines employees who say this is a problem that needs to be addressed. Some of their claims are chilling. They agreed to go on the record, if we did not use their names.

When you fly do you know how rested your pilots are?
"On almost every e-mail we received it was the same story. Pilots saying fatigue is a real factor and sleeping in the cockpit happens more often than passengers realize.I have personally flown flights with captains that have fallen asleep," writes one pilot for Mesa.. which owns go! Airlines.

Another former Mesa pilot we spoke to admits he's done it, but say's he's not proud of it.
"I've fallen asleep, there have been times I've told the other crew members I am out you have the airplane."

According to FAA regulations, pilots can fly for 8 hours but can be on duty up to 16 hours a day.
One former Mesa pilot says long days were standard practice at the airlines, where he flew for 6 years.
"There would be many, many times that we would be on duty for 16 hours and completely wiped out. And then depending if it was on a 3 or 4 day trip, you know that could be day 1 or day 2 and you still had 2 more days to go."

Another former Mesa pilot tells KGMB9 he recently resigned during a trip that included flying and commute time that would have approached 22 hours. A copy of his schedule confirms that.
"And after that they wanted me to have minimum rest of 9 hours and go back to work and I didn't find it plausible it was absolutely incredible."

The rules allow a minimum of 8 hours of rest time. It starts shortly after pilots land the plane. But it doesn't mean a crew member is getting 8 hours of sleep.

"From that point, you still need to get off the plane, get your stuff, walk out, wait for a shuttle bus that could be another 10-15 minutes and then it could be another 20 minutes to get to your hotel, get to your room."ll airlines have a policy designed to protect pilots. Those who are too tired to fly can call in fatigued without fear of retribution. But a former Mesa pilot says it's not that easy.

"You can't just call in fatigued because you are tired. If a schedule is technically legal FAA minimum legal then it's not enough, not enough of a reason."

Mesa's CEO Jonathan Ornstein, "We don't write the rules, we abide by them. We've done it for 25 years and will continue to do so for the next 25 years."

But does legal mean safe? The FAA says yes.
"We believe current work rule hours are sufficient and effective. It's really up to the pilots and the airline to make sure they are properly rested," said Ian Gregor, FAA Pacific Regional Spokesman.

The FAA considered changing the rules back in 1995 but couldn't reach a consensus with the aviation community.

Pilot fatigue is on the National Transportation Safety Boards most wanted list when it comes to safety improvements.

The agency has asked the FAA to modify its rules to take into consideration research findings in fatigue and sleep issues . On its website, the NTSB says the FAA's response on this issue has been unacceptable.

"We take everything the NTSB says very seriously and in many cases we do implement the recommendations," said Gregor. Not soon enough for pilots who say until the flight rules are changed, fatigue will remain a factor in the skies.

The FAA says if in fact pilots are falling asleep in cockpits or if their company has forced them to fly when they've been too tired, they want to know about it. Only then can the agency do something about it.





......JO is SCREWED. The Mesa freight train will impact the Brick Wall of Death very soon. Time to jump ship. EJECT EJECT EJECT! If you still work at that shytehole, get out NOW while you still can! Remember, Aloha's lawsuit is just around the corner! GET OUT NOW while there are still jobs out there and you don't have to contend with the ENTIRE UNEMPLOYED MESA PILOT GROUP as your competition. FLEE. RUN. DO IT. SAVE YOURSELF AND SINK THE SHIP ON YOUR WAY OUT!!!
 
Mesa's CEO Jonathan Ornstein, "We don't write the rules, we abide by them. We've done it for 25 years and will continue to do so for the next 25 years."

What a tool! That comment is totally unexceptable.

But does legal mean safe? The FAA says yes.
"We believe current work rule hours are sufficient and effective. It's really up to the pilots and the airline to make sure they are properly rested," said Ian Gregor, FAA Pacific Regional Spokesman.

No it's not safe! You can fly reduced rest but you can't fly more then 30/100. The stupidest rule ever. Give me 12 hours rest everyday and I can fly 40 hr weeks and 160 months or some variation of that. I personally wouldn't want to to but there are pilots out there that need the money and it would be safe for them to fly those hours.
 
Last edited:
You may think this incident will focus national attention on the fatigue issue, but you'd be wrong. The American people just want cheap transportation. Revising the rest rules would just require airlines to hire more crews, and would raise fares.

All that will happen is this crew will be publicly castigated as bad guys, will be disposed of, and the public will think the bad apples have been weeded out. Then they will stick their heads back in the sand and pretend the fatigue issue doesn't exist, while they sit back and enjoy their $199 transcon flight and bitch there's no free meal service.
 
Remember, Aloha's lawsuit is just around the corner! GET OUT NOW while there are still jobs out there and you don't have to contend with the ENTIRE UNEMPLOYED MESA PILOT GROUP as your competition. FLEE. RUN. DO IT. SAVE YOURSELF AND SINK THE SHIP ON YOUR WAY OUT!!!

With all the merger talk, hiring at the regionals has slowed down. There are still good jobs out there, but when MESA goes under many of the jobs will no longer be there. Getting out while you still can may be great advice. Be carefull where you go. SkyWest, ASA, and Chataqua seem like the safest bets.

I think that as soon as the Aloha lawsuit is over Mesa will be done. They have been losing money for a while now. Once the cash is gone they cannot survive. There is no way the can compete. They cannot get the lease rates needed to compete against stronger airlines like SkyWest and Chataqua.

Mesa has been in a downward spiral for a while now, but the Go operation has put MESA in a nosedive.

It used to be that MESA sucked, but you knew the doors would be open there and you would be able to collect a paycheck. Now MESA still sucks, and there is no longer the guarantee of a paycheck. At some point they will close the door owing money to their employees, while JO has a good ole time in his house in Malibu.
 
Not Aloha's lawsuit.

Hawaiian won their lawsuit, and now it's our turn. From what Judge Faris was saying, Aloha has a much stronger case than Hawaiian.
 
Stif...

Everyone knows, but as stated earlier no one cares. Nor has sympathy. Believe it or not, there are regular folk out there who work more hellacious schedules than pilots. They read this sort of thing and laugh.
 
Stif...

Everyone knows, but as stated earlier no one cares. Nor has sympathy. Believe it or not, there are regular folk out there who work more hellacious schedules than pilots. They read this sort of thing and laugh.

Exactly. John Q. Public reads the Mc Paper and thinks we all make $250,000 a year and work 80 hours TOTAL a month. Then he goes to his middle management office job and puts in 60 hours a WEEK. He finds it hard to feel sorry for us with our fatigue issues. He doesn't get it. Never will.

In a typical month, I spend 350 hours at work. This includes time in a hotel in East Bumblef***. Again, John Q. says "I travel, what's the big deal"? They don't get it.
 
No pilot wants the rest/duty time regulations to be changed more than I.

However, this issue will have to be addressed by pilots speaking with one voice though significant and expensive Congressional lobbying efforts. And that means ALPA.

100 pilots complaining about 100 different things that were all 100% legally scheduled will accomplish nothing, except make pilots look like a bunch of whinny she-dogs. Even though we KNOW that's not true, and the reality is far worse than most imagine.

Fact is though, a professional lobbyist (ALPA) can present a far better case and unified message than a bunch of dis-combulated stories.

It may also give "Go!" a black eye in front of the public, which I suppose will please many; I think in addition to giving fodder to some reporter looking for her next 2 minutes of quickly forgotten copy, maybe it would be best to forward some of the many horror-stories to ALPA-national as well.

We pressure ALPA, they write some checks and pressure Congress, then things MIGHT change.

IMHO.
 
Last edited:
sorry but getting alpa to do it is a pipe dream.

the rules will only change after the public/faa has had enough accidents. the only thing we can do is draw attention to the problem when we can and hope less it lessens the number of accidents required to make a rule change.

if anything at least we'll get some personal satisfaction out of the deal. i bet that guy with the crew track sheet is feeling a bit better now.... thats what i call therapy.


:)
 
Ornstein is a COMPLETE IDIOT for threatening Stacy Loe.

These bullies DO NOT threaten our girls in Hawaii and get away with it. Any locals in Hawaii who were on the fence or indifferent towards go! are not indifferent anymore.

Leisure travelers from afar are no longer as uninformed as in the past and less likely to be scammed by go! with the recent national coverage of this fiasco.

Throw JO down the well. Bye bye go! soon to be went!
 
Throw JO down the well. Bye bye go! soon to be went!
In my country there is problem,
And that problem is transport.
It take very very long,
Because US and A is big.

Throw transport down the well
So my country can be free
We must make travel easy
Then we’ll have a big party

In my country there is problem
And that problem is JO
He take everybody money
And he never give it back

Throw JO down the well
So my country can be free
You must grab him by his horns
Then we have a big party

If you see JO coming
You must be carefull of his teeth
You must grab him by his money
And I tell you what to do

Throw JO down the well
So my country can be free
You must grab him by his horns
Then we have a big party



Never has an inappropriate song about Jews by Borat been easier to change for my own purposes. :)

Also...

Ornstein is a COMPLETE IDIOT for threatening Stacy Loe.
Wouldya?
 
Last edited:
sorry but getting alpa to do it is a pipe dream.

the rules will only change after the public/faa has had enough accidents. the only thing we can do is draw attention to the problem when we can and hope less it lessens the number of accidents required to make a rule change.

:)

I'm not optimistic that ALPA will be able to change anything about anything. I'm just resigned to the reality that they're the only game in town when it comes to lobbying Congress for rule changes.

The only other way rules will change is if there are several more accidents and casualties that are 100% attributable to fatigue. Difficult to prove, because unless the pilots are asleep when the actual crash takes place, fatigue is just listed as one of many other factors.
 
Most safety-related FAR's are written in blood.

When fatigue becomes either the probable cause or a major contributing factor to a crash at a Part 121 airline, then you'll see a change. Until then.... I feel sorry for guys working at Mesa. Alls I can say is that it gets way better.
 
Throw JO down the well
So my country can be free
You must grab him by his horns
Then we have a big party

If you see JO coming
You must be carefull of his teeth
You must grab him by his money
And I tell you what to do

Throw JO down the well
So my country can be free
You must grab him by his horns
Then we have a big party

Also...


Wouldya?

Stacy is HOT. Even more hot now that she rode JO with her strap on!

How I would pay to see a photochop of Stacy Loe riding JO in this picture of JO bending over.

Anybody got photochop?
 
I disagree to a point w/ the pessimistic view on the public... They don't want to fly w/ tired pilots- and there is convincing research it seems like every month that is relating a lack of sleep, and sleep schedule consistency to the negative effects of alcohol. A mistake i think ALPA and all our unions make is that they do not galvanize the public very well at all.

How would you change the rest rules?

To me they are designed to protect int'l pilots and are purely political... Otherwise why would we limit flight time instead of duty time? Why is it ok for turboprops to fly 34/120/1200 when it's much harder to build time in them? Same for 135 unsched of 500/800/1400. It's not about the pilot and what's safe-

To me = i know this would have Int'l ops issues- but the duty limit should be 12 hours and fly as much as you can- like the JB experiment- but keep the week/month/year limits. That would lead to more days off.. which ... another i'm fond of saying- If i get enough time at home- i can fly every day of the month and not get tired... It's about a sustainable schedule where pilots aren't getting wrecked at least 2 days a week and have to spend many of their off days just recovering.
 
Most safety-related FAR's are written in blood.

When fatigue becomes either the probable cause or a major contributing factor to a crash at a Part 121 airline, then you'll see a change. Until then.... I feel sorry for guys working at Mesa. Alls I can say is that it gets way better.

I wholeheartedly agree about the FAR's being written in blood, but I just cannot ever see fatigue being listed as the probable cause of a crash. It will just be called pilot error, and maybe have fatigue as a possible factor. Unless some guys are going on and on about how tired and fatigued they are on the the cvr, yawning, making constant errors, etc, and then put it in the dirt, maybe... But then the pilots will be crucified for not calling off fatigued, since all airline CEO's are quick to remind the public that "our pilots can call off fatigued at anytime without reprimand."
 
How would you change the rest rules?

ALPA's official position is:

12 hr max duty day
8 hr max scheduled flying
10 hr min "free from duty" between shifts.

I used to think this was ALPA trying to "featherbed" and artificially inflate due-paying members; bitter experience at Mesa taught me that this sort of inflexibility is necessary, because there will always be a few carriers who push pilot schedules beyond the limits of common sense (but totally legal, of course).

===================================

ALPA will have to lobby for change. There are powerful forces lobbying for exactly the opposite, and have prevented any significant change in duty times despite DECADES of NTSB and NASA commissioned studies.

The unfiltered results from the most extensive study ever taken on pilot fatigue in the US by NASA was heavily censored by airline industry interests not less than a year ago.

(ALPA and FOIA is fighting to make the results on this study public)

The sad truth is, Mesa-type airlines would rather just absorb the insurance premiums they pay to cover the occasional fatigue-related crash than to pay to have enough pilots to both meet their scheduling demands and to conform to pilots physiologically driven circadian rhythm requirements.

Sad but true.
 
Last edited:
As usual, it will take blood to get any rules to change. That's what happens when the system is reactive, not proactive.
 
To me that's the point of a national union- Bottom line, it's not safe and it's certainly not sustainable over the long term health wise- It's bad to crash- but it's also bad to lose your medical.
We should stand united on that and refuse to fly these schedules as a group. Regulatory changes are a much better protection than any contract... Seems better rest rules- or provisions designed to give companies a financial motive for more efficient schedules in any contract always go away on the downturn--- this is too important...

But again, it begs the question- why do we have a national union if we cannot strike together over issues that affect everyone.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom