JetBlue/SWA linkup may be in the works.

[Splert]

Yep. Codesharing without a job security section isn't smart. They trusted management and we shouldn't.

Scope, succesorship snd job security while code sharing is going to be expensive because we have no protection.

None

 

[Skyboy722]

I don't see that the ALPA negotiated CBA's of ATA and Midwest did much to help those pilots out when they were bought.

Well, ATA was already way,way out of business and Midwest will be integrated. (Eventually I guess)

 

[Splert]

Allowing an airline to contine to grow a code share while they are furloughing pilots is stupid.

Once the airline start this process it is impossible to get this job security into a contract. JetBlue pilot needs to stand firm NOW.

But after reading my fellow pilots on this forum I think it is already too late for us.

Management has freedom to do anything with this pilot group and we will not stand up for ourselves.

Instead we have pilots that think other pilots, other management or Congress will protect us.

 

[bluesideup340]

Instead we have pilots that think other pilots, other management or Congress will protect us.

Neither will ALPA or the RLA. Just to make you list complete.

 

[Splert]

Neither will ALPA or the RLA. Just to make you list complete.

Your are correct.

It is up to the pilot group to stand firm together for meaningful protections of a CBA.

Unless you think it is the wonderful culture of AMR/UAL/DAL/HAL/ALA/FedEx's that prevents Chautauqua/SkyWest/Express Jet/Republic from flying AMR/UAL/DAL/HAL/ALA/FedEx's 737 (A320) - 777s (A330).

Midwest pilot thought culture was better than the job security section of their CBA applying to code sharing. I hope Jetblue pilot drop the blind faith and stand firm together. But after following your posts on this forum I don't think we have a chance.

I'm planning on The JetBlue Brand being around for a long time. The problem though is that JetBlue pilots will not be operating JetBlue coded flights 5 years from today.

So Bluesideup340, is it culture or contract that limits the ability of these major airlines from outsourcing 777 (A330) - 737 (A320) to a code share partner?

 

[bluesideup340]

Your are correct.

It is up to the pilot group to stand firm together for meaningful protections of a CBA.

Unless you think it is the wonderful culture of AMR/UAL/DAL/HAL/ALA/FedEx's that prevents Chautauqua/SkyWest/Express Jet/Republic from flying AMR/UAL/DAL/HAL/ALA/FedEx's 737 (A320) - 777s (A330).

Midwest pilot thought culture was better than the job security section of their CBA applying to code sharing. I hope Jetblue pilot drop the blind faith and stand firm together. But after following your posts on this forum I don't think we have a chance.

I'm planning on The JetBlue Brand being around for a long time. The problem though is that JetBlue pilots will not be operating JetBlue coded flights 5 years from today.

So Bluesideup340, is it culture or contract that limits the ability of these major airlines from outsourcing 777 (A330) - 737 (A320) to a code share partner?

Splert
Just for clarification we might have to define a few terms here. Codeshare is an aviation business term for the practice of multiple airlines selling space on the same flights, where a seat can be purchased on one airline as if actually operated by a cooperating airline under a different flight number or code. It allows greater access to cities through a given airline's network without having to offer extra flights, and makes connections simpler by allowing single bookings across multiple planes. Most major US airlines have code sharing partnerships with other airlines and code sharing is a key feature of the major airline alliances.
This should not be confused with a wet lease or ACMI agreement. A wet lease is a leasing arrangement whereby one airline (lessor) provides an aircraft, complete crew, maintenance, and insurance (ACMI) to another airline (lessee), which pays by hours operated. The lessee provides fuel and covers airport fees, and any other duties, taxes, etc. The flight uses the flight number of the lessee.
With these terms defined let us discuss your question. As ACMI or wet lease providers Chautauqua/SkyWest/ExpressJet/etc. only fly equipment for which they have a lease agreement, not to be confuse with a codeshare agreement, and we all know scope has limited that to 70 seats or less in very generic terms. We could get into a large debate of what role ALPA played in this whole mess, but it might suffice to say, scope is not a good example for you to illustrate why and how a CBA can protect our jobs.
About the codeshare agreements; it is neither culture nor contract it is business. All major US airlines engage in codeshare agreements otherwise their alliances would not work. These codeshare are not limited to alliance with other international carrier. For example AA/Alaska, DL/Alaska, AA/JB, and DL/ Midwest Express.
While we are on the subject of Midwest Express. The Pilots of Midwest were doomed because of a failed business model. No contract or anything else could have prevented the demise of the airline.

 

[Splert]

Oh boy...

Code Share, ACMI and Wet Lease and Interline Agreement are terms found in the definition section of a CBA. The CBA defines what these terms mean as they relate to each specific airline and pilot group.

The AA/Alaska code share wouldn't be allowed without relief from the APA/ALA CBA. In fact both CBAs have a section carved out specially for this agreement.

Same with DAL and ALA and DAL with then NWA.

AA/JB is a code share? Holy cow. That would be news to the APA. I thought it was an interline agreement. AMR has some 'splaining' to do.

SkyWest does not provide ACMI or wet leases to UAL and DAL they are code share partners. Each CBA has an entire section devoted to granting the airline relief to allow SkyWest to operate with UAL and DAL code and to share revenue either at risk or pro-rate.

Again what prevents AMR from contracting Chautauqua in an ACMI, Wet Lease or pro rate or at risk code share contract operate Triple 7s on AMR code, routes with AMR passenger and sold on AMR website and the Global Distributions Systems?

APAs CBA. Without these section APA would be out of jobs. That is Job Security.

Same with FedEx.

Same with HAL, ALA, UAL, DAL etc.

Midwest pilots screwed up. They trusted the culture and did not stand firm for the Job Security Section of their contract to apply to code sharing.

The JetBlue Brand will live on without JetBlue pilots. I have a side gig. I hope you do. Really I do.

 

[Splert]

Splert
Just for clarification we might have to define a few terms here. Codeshare is an aviation business term for the practice of multiple airlines selling space on the same flights, where a seat can be purchased on one airline as if actually operated by a cooperating airline under a different flight number or code. It allows greater access to cities through a given airline's network without having to offer extra flights, and makes connections simpler by allowing single bookings across multiple planes. Most major US airlines have code sharing partnerships with other airlines and code sharing is a key feature of the major airline alliances.
This should not be confused with a wet lease or ACMI agreement. A wet lease is a leasing arrangement whereby one airline (lessor) provides an aircraft, complete crew, maintenance, and insurance (ACMI) to another airline (lessee), which pays by hours operated. The lessee provides fuel and covers airport fees, and any other duties, taxes, etc. The flight uses the flight number of the lessee.
With these terms defined let us discuss your question. As ACMI or wet lease providers Chautauqua/SkyWest/ExpressJet/etc. only fly equipment for which they have a lease agreement, not to be confuse with a codeshare agreement, and we all know scope has limited that to 70 seats or less in very generic terms. We could get into a large debate of what role ALPA played in this whole mess, but it might suffice to say, scope is not a good example for you to illustrate why and how a CBA can protect our jobs.
About the codeshare agreements; it is neither culture nor contract it is business. All major US airlines engage in codeshare agreements otherwise their alliances would not work. These codeshare are not limited to alliance with other international carrier. For example AA/Alaska, DL/Alaska, AA/JB, and DL/ Midwest Express.
While we are on the subject of Midwest Express. The Pilots of Midwest were doomed because of a failed business model. No contract or anything else could have prevented the demise of the airline.

Congratulations...

You discovered Wikipedia and how to cut and paste. Just a suggestion but you may want to come up with an original thought or at least delete the hot links from your plagiarized text.

BTW, here is a cut and paste from SkyWest's Annual Report.

http://www.skywest.com/skywinc/invest/reports.php

ITEM 1. BUSINESS
General
Through SkyWest Airlines and ASA, our wholly-owned subsidiaries, we offer scheduled passenger service with approximately 2,300 daily departures to 217 destinations in the United States, Canada, Mexico and the Caribbean. Substantially all of our flights are operated as Delta Connection, United Express or AirTran under code-share arrangements with Delta, United or AirTran, respectively, with significant presence in Delta and United’s key domestic hubs and focus cities. SkyWest Airlines and ASA generally provide regional flying to our partners under long-term, fixed-fee code-share agreements. Among other features of our fixed-fee agreements, our partners generally reimburse us for specified direct operating expenses (including

What limits SkyWest ability to contract to operate CRJ 700's but not UAL and DAL 777s and 747-400s? United Airlines culture or business model or is it the pilots Collective Bargained Agreement with UAL or DAL.

 

[aewanabe]

Splert, I admire your desire to fight the good fight on the forum... You can give some guys direct examples of the failure of collAboration and they just don't care as long as the rice bowl is filled.

 

[Splert]

Splert, I admire your desire to fight the good fight on the forum... You can give some guys direct examples of the failure of collAboration and they just don't care as long as the rice bowl is filled.

I agree...

But others may read 1/16 truths and believe it. The exchange isn't so much to convince a juicer who plagiarized Wikipedia but for others whose mind is open to learn more about the huge loopholes that is our PEA and FSM and the mirage of a direct relationship and culture.