Beechnut
Ndugu's Foster Dad
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2001
- Posts
- 714
I wrestled with posting this update on a public forum. After reaching a limit of frustration, I thought some of you may like to see how it is our "Direct Relationship" is working at JetBlue. We are in the era of Republic Airlines. A company that has successfully replaced a brand of flying with crews that are far less expensive.
At JetBlue, we have no Scope protections. Our Pilot Values Committee has approached management seeking legally binding language protecting pilot jobs. The Company has been unwilling to protect the pilots. Instead, they have offered the following:
..."management suggested a culturally based proposal for dealing with scope issues, meaning that scope language would not be enforceable or binding in a court of law. The PVC co-chairs determined that this concept was unacceptable. Scope language that is not enforceable… is not scope language. The company does not want scope language restrictive to the extent that it would inhibit growth opportunities, however, the changes and flexibility needed to advance those opportunities would need full agreement with the PVC in order to provide a positive outcome for both the pilot group and the company."
"A culturally based proposal" means that we take the company's word that they wouldn't farm out flying to cheaper folks. That's it. Take their word. Dont' worry! Trust us!
The very idea that they would even suggest this as a solution is spectacular. What's more, they also know they have the support of an element of pilots that so don't want to disrupt their own 'good thing' that they felt comfortable making this offer.
Most of the members of our PVC seem to have their hearts in the right place. Unfortunately, what we need now is something more than the toothless bite they can only offer.
With this post, my name has been added to whatever list Forest Hills may be compiling these days, so with that let me say:
Hi Jenny
Hi Dean
S.
At JetBlue, we have no Scope protections. Our Pilot Values Committee has approached management seeking legally binding language protecting pilot jobs. The Company has been unwilling to protect the pilots. Instead, they have offered the following:
..."management suggested a culturally based proposal for dealing with scope issues, meaning that scope language would not be enforceable or binding in a court of law. The PVC co-chairs determined that this concept was unacceptable. Scope language that is not enforceable… is not scope language. The company does not want scope language restrictive to the extent that it would inhibit growth opportunities, however, the changes and flexibility needed to advance those opportunities would need full agreement with the PVC in order to provide a positive outcome for both the pilot group and the company."
"A culturally based proposal" means that we take the company's word that they wouldn't farm out flying to cheaper folks. That's it. Take their word. Dont' worry! Trust us!
The very idea that they would even suggest this as a solution is spectacular. What's more, they also know they have the support of an element of pilots that so don't want to disrupt their own 'good thing' that they felt comfortable making this offer.
Most of the members of our PVC seem to have their hearts in the right place. Unfortunately, what we need now is something more than the toothless bite they can only offer.
With this post, my name has been added to whatever list Forest Hills may be compiling these days, so with that let me say:
Hi Jenny
Hi Dean
S.