BeachBummer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2005
- Posts
- 997
You're right! Rational pilots do want a union!
When you fix it I'll vote for it.
I voted but This was like hoping that Oscar Dela hoya would knockout Mike Tyson. It was a bad bet.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You're right! Rational pilots do want a union!
This is the fundamental problem!! ALPA in a word just plain sucks. ok 3 words. National sets no presidence for its followers. It's like having a chain that has 400 links that don't connect. It has no preferential hiring into other carriers no job placment for furloughed individuals no pay protection in the event of job loss. Look what the UAW has done. If alpa had half the nads of the uaw it might be worth something... it's a paper tiger that is easily burt when times are tough.
When you fix it I'll vote for it.
I voted but This was like hoping that Oscar Dela hoya would knockout Mike Tyson. It was a bad bet.
It's interesting to me that nobody seems to think that maybe it wasn't a union that was the problem, but rather that it was going to be underfunded(1% dues of 2000 Pilots) and undersupported with at best a little over 50% support. What kind of leverage is that? I flew with not one pilot willing to strike, how do you expect to negotiate a good deal?
The quickest way for JB to end up with a strong and realistic union is for the managment team to piss off 80% and then have a union with enough support(money and volunteers) to truly make a difference.
Not voting for JBPA doesn't mean that the person is non union, just not for this union.
AirTran with 2% dues is looking to go ALPA and lacks funds. They have gone through many years of turmoil to get to that point, and it seems maybe we learned a lesson there?
Pilots don't normally like to work for free, and that would get old quickly, leading to the need for more dues for FPL.
Writing in ALPA or teamsters was in reality a vote for JBPA. So if you didn't like the in house union, does that mean you should not be allowed to jumpseat?
There are many reasons people arrived at the decisions they did, but just like a presidential election, it is over and we need to pull together until the next one.
A weak union could be worse than none....
It's interesting to me that nobody seems to think that maybe it wasn't a union that was the problem, but rather that it was going to be underfunded(1% dues of 2000 Pilots) and undersupported with at best a little over 50% support. What kind of leverage is that? I flew with not one pilot willing to strike, how do you expect to negotiate a good deal?
The quickest way for JB to end up with a strong and realistic union is for the management team to piss off 80% and then have a union with enough support(money and volunteers) to truly make a difference.
Not voting for JBPA doesn't mean that the person is non union, just not for this union.
AirTran with 2% dues is looking to go ALPA and lacks funds. They have gone through many years of turmoil to get to that point, and it seems maybe we learned a lesson there?
Pilots don't normally like to work for free, and that would get old quickly, leading to the need for more dues for FPL.
Writing in ALPA or teamsters was in reality a vote for JBPA. So if you didn't like the in house union, does that mean you should not be allowed to jumpseat?
There are many reasons people arrived at the decisions they did, but just like a presidential election, it is over and we need to pull together until the next one.
A weak union could be worse than none....
Just cannot believe rational pilots would not want a union?
So why not vote in representation and make the JBPA what it should be.
Because there wasn't enough support to make it work amongst this group now, enough aren't frustrated yet. 10-12 years for AT and they still can't make it work..long time to be frustrated and paying for the privledge
What you are really saying is, you don't like what the JBPA had set up, because it required you and all jb pilots to do the heavy lifting......right?
I have done your "heavy lifting" at many other airlines, including committee chairmanship under IBT and ALPA. I am saying they didn't seem to have what I thought would be effective, would you go buy a product or service you viewed as ineffective? I don't mean S and E were the problem, I mean the lack of money(1%) and lack of support amongst the group would have doomed them now. I never had to decide whether I wanted to be represented because the vehicle being sold didn't meet my needs.
Please don't try to read into "what I am really saying, I am saying what I am really saying"
tz
Because there wasn't enough support to make it work amongst this group now, enough aren't frustrated yet. 10-12 years for AT and they still can't make it work..long time to be frustrated and paying for the privledge
I have done your "heavy lifting" at many other airlines, including committee chairmanship under IBT and ALPA.
I am saying they didn't seem to have what I thought would be effective,
would you go buy a product or service you viewed as ineffective?
I don't mean S and E were the problem, I mean the lack of money(1%) and lack of support amongst the group would have doomed them now.
I never had to decide whether I wanted to be represented because the vehicle being sold didn't meet my needs..
Please don't try to read into "what I am really saying, I am saying what I am really saying"
tz