SpeedBird
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2001
- Posts
- 257
Tony:
Let me first say that I find it somewhat remarkable that you feel the need to parse the words of any jetBlue pilot with regard to how he/she may describe their professional working relationship with their fellow pilots and/or jetBlue management. Tell me is that really the issue for you or do you have some other ax to grind here. I could almost understand if you were a pilot for AA, UAL, or DAL.....but FedEx.....please!
Anyway, your example of the B707 is at best a poor example wrt to the issue here at hand. But does speak volumes about the mindset you have regarding how you view this profession through the prism created by the Civil Aeronautics Board which died over a generation ago.
First, the example you're trying to square this issue with occurred during a time when this industry was highly regulated and airfares were controlled by the CAB, not by free-market forces in a deregulated industry like we have today. This meant that pilot unions could negotiate "productivity" increases in hourly rates with a much larger and faster aircraft and all management had to do was get the CAB to bump up airfares in controlled (i.e., limited competition) markets to recover any extra cost increases, if necessary. The margin between costs and yields remained largely intact by all airlines affected by such pilot actions. This led to the birth of pattern-style bargaining tactics which served both sides in a regulated environment.
Once again, today's industry bears virtually no resemblance to your example. As B707s began transcon service it put the technologically inferior DC-7s, Connies, and Stratocruisers out of the market almost overnight. The issue here does not take into account any technological enhancements which might give one airline a clear operating advantage over another and thus allow pilots to be paid more purely on that basis only.
With the EMB-190s jetBlue will exploit the regional markets which are largely served by express carriers with 50-70 seat RJs; and while they may be less expensive to operate than a mainline 100 seat aircraft; they only serve as an intermediate stop-gap to what customers demand in those markets in both pricing and comfort; and what LCCs will provide to them at even lower cost to their financial bottomlines. This particular segment of the market is ripe for the picking due in large part from the decision of mainline pilot groups to institute scope agreements between themselves and their regional partners several years ago. This artificiality of the industry is now going to bite countless pilots on the butt who are subjected to such scope agreements. Free-market systems do not tolerate such artificially imposed restrictions and eventually take advantage of such impediments by those who are not constrained by them.
I find it ironic that some people are quick to accuse jetBlue of bringing down the industry, yet jetBlue will maintain a single pilot seniority at the airline. Imagine if other mainline pilot groups had allowed the same thing years ago, instead of separating themselves from thousands of otherwise qualified pilots and turning them into the proverbial red-headed step children of the industry. Scope agreements should have never been instituted and now this artificiality will be exploited by LCCs which don't have an obligation to do so simply for nothing other than basic business and competitive reasons. Look, I am not defending the actions of jetBlue managers in this situation, but to label them as selfish and exploitive of their own pilots makes me wonder about the hair-trigger nature of some to act in such a manner with less than all the facts in hand and despite David & Dave's long track record of dealing more than fairly with jetBlue pilots in the past.
The domestic airline industry we see today is not the industry of our fathers' or grand-fathers' time, let alone 5 years ago. Everyone demands that the changes we are witnessing to our profession must be halted and reversed, and we are quick to condemn and find fault with those who appear to violate the standards which have taken decades to create. But what is happening to the profession is much bigger and more complex than what any single pilot group can withstand. If the two unionized pilot groups representing the two largest airlines in the world couldn't stop the major reductions in their hourly rates and work rules, how can you seriously believe that jetBlue is going to do anything materially different? Despite this fact I have yet to see the same level of collective frustration aimed at AA & UAL pilots as I've witnessed on these boards against jetblue pilots. Tony, this is why I find your comments not only out of order but extremely disingenuous.
Bottom-line: Going forward pilots will not be paid based on the old ways of defining productivity under the methods used during the heydays of a regulated industry, but based on what an airline can earn based on the difference between revenues and costs....as defined by an unregulated marketplace. Don't mistake my statements here as an approval of such changes. I don't like this anymore than any of you, but I also understand that it is very improbable that we can return to the pay rates and work rules that we've witnessed in the past and perhaps mistakenly believe that we all deserve better as a matter of principle. The gravity and reality of the situation forces me to temper my expectations and not go flying off the handle because my financial value as a pilot is not being maintained at some arbitrary level implemented during a much different time in our industry.
Finally, while you want to create a theorhetical mutually-exclusive environment between the goals of managers and pilots in how we should be compensated, I see the situation as it exists at jetBlue where both sides can be mutually satisfied, but only if cooler heads prevail and jetBlue pilots stay focused on what's relevant.
What's important is not what you think we should do in this instance, but what we as jetBlue pilots will do armed with all the information needed to make an informed and carefully considered decision on what will first be best for us, our company, and if possible what is good for this profession. JetBlue is too young and too small to act as your sole vehicle for fixing single-handedly what ails this profession. So please spare us your disdain for how we employ the use of the words "WE" and "THEY."
Let me first say that I find it somewhat remarkable that you feel the need to parse the words of any jetBlue pilot with regard to how he/she may describe their professional working relationship with their fellow pilots and/or jetBlue management. Tell me is that really the issue for you or do you have some other ax to grind here. I could almost understand if you were a pilot for AA, UAL, or DAL.....but FedEx.....please!
Anyway, your example of the B707 is at best a poor example wrt to the issue here at hand. But does speak volumes about the mindset you have regarding how you view this profession through the prism created by the Civil Aeronautics Board which died over a generation ago.
First, the example you're trying to square this issue with occurred during a time when this industry was highly regulated and airfares were controlled by the CAB, not by free-market forces in a deregulated industry like we have today. This meant that pilot unions could negotiate "productivity" increases in hourly rates with a much larger and faster aircraft and all management had to do was get the CAB to bump up airfares in controlled (i.e., limited competition) markets to recover any extra cost increases, if necessary. The margin between costs and yields remained largely intact by all airlines affected by such pilot actions. This led to the birth of pattern-style bargaining tactics which served both sides in a regulated environment.
Once again, today's industry bears virtually no resemblance to your example. As B707s began transcon service it put the technologically inferior DC-7s, Connies, and Stratocruisers out of the market almost overnight. The issue here does not take into account any technological enhancements which might give one airline a clear operating advantage over another and thus allow pilots to be paid more purely on that basis only.
With the EMB-190s jetBlue will exploit the regional markets which are largely served by express carriers with 50-70 seat RJs; and while they may be less expensive to operate than a mainline 100 seat aircraft; they only serve as an intermediate stop-gap to what customers demand in those markets in both pricing and comfort; and what LCCs will provide to them at even lower cost to their financial bottomlines. This particular segment of the market is ripe for the picking due in large part from the decision of mainline pilot groups to institute scope agreements between themselves and their regional partners several years ago. This artificiality of the industry is now going to bite countless pilots on the butt who are subjected to such scope agreements. Free-market systems do not tolerate such artificially imposed restrictions and eventually take advantage of such impediments by those who are not constrained by them.
I find it ironic that some people are quick to accuse jetBlue of bringing down the industry, yet jetBlue will maintain a single pilot seniority at the airline. Imagine if other mainline pilot groups had allowed the same thing years ago, instead of separating themselves from thousands of otherwise qualified pilots and turning them into the proverbial red-headed step children of the industry. Scope agreements should have never been instituted and now this artificiality will be exploited by LCCs which don't have an obligation to do so simply for nothing other than basic business and competitive reasons. Look, I am not defending the actions of jetBlue managers in this situation, but to label them as selfish and exploitive of their own pilots makes me wonder about the hair-trigger nature of some to act in such a manner with less than all the facts in hand and despite David & Dave's long track record of dealing more than fairly with jetBlue pilots in the past.
The domestic airline industry we see today is not the industry of our fathers' or grand-fathers' time, let alone 5 years ago. Everyone demands that the changes we are witnessing to our profession must be halted and reversed, and we are quick to condemn and find fault with those who appear to violate the standards which have taken decades to create. But what is happening to the profession is much bigger and more complex than what any single pilot group can withstand. If the two unionized pilot groups representing the two largest airlines in the world couldn't stop the major reductions in their hourly rates and work rules, how can you seriously believe that jetBlue is going to do anything materially different? Despite this fact I have yet to see the same level of collective frustration aimed at AA & UAL pilots as I've witnessed on these boards against jetblue pilots. Tony, this is why I find your comments not only out of order but extremely disingenuous.
Bottom-line: Going forward pilots will not be paid based on the old ways of defining productivity under the methods used during the heydays of a regulated industry, but based on what an airline can earn based on the difference between revenues and costs....as defined by an unregulated marketplace. Don't mistake my statements here as an approval of such changes. I don't like this anymore than any of you, but I also understand that it is very improbable that we can return to the pay rates and work rules that we've witnessed in the past and perhaps mistakenly believe that we all deserve better as a matter of principle. The gravity and reality of the situation forces me to temper my expectations and not go flying off the handle because my financial value as a pilot is not being maintained at some arbitrary level implemented during a much different time in our industry.
Finally, while you want to create a theorhetical mutually-exclusive environment between the goals of managers and pilots in how we should be compensated, I see the situation as it exists at jetBlue where both sides can be mutually satisfied, but only if cooler heads prevail and jetBlue pilots stay focused on what's relevant.
What's important is not what you think we should do in this instance, but what we as jetBlue pilots will do armed with all the information needed to make an informed and carefully considered decision on what will first be best for us, our company, and if possible what is good for this profession. JetBlue is too young and too small to act as your sole vehicle for fixing single-handedly what ails this profession. So please spare us your disdain for how we employ the use of the words "WE" and "THEY."