Flyby1206
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2004
- Posts
- 1,088
I am going to get seriously blasted by every pro-union guy on here, but i'll put on my fire proof suit. Please read this:
http://www.swelblog.com/articles/autos-airlines-and-the-question-of-union-relevance.html
http://www.swelblog.com/articles/autos-airlines-and-the-question-of-union-relevance.html
The Journal continues: “Mr. King's dilemma is evident in his lukewarm response to the Big Three's opening gambit in this year's quadrennial contract talks, an offer of enlarged profit-sharing. Here's the problem: Incentive pay is earned pay; workers see profits as something businesses create, not something union bosses create. And the foreign transplants will only be too happy to compete on the basis of performance-related pay. If the industry is headed toward compensation based on success, what are workers getting for their UAW dues?”
I see it clearly as a way to better align the interests of workers and management across an entire business cycle and as a way to avoid the crazy cycle of take/give/take and the resulting bad blood and mistrust between union leadership, employees and management.
Think about this: If variable compensation was in place following the concessionary period of 1993 – 1995, workers would have gained far more between 1996 – 2001, the most profitable period in airline history when U.S. airlines earned in excess of $40 billion. Instead employees received nothing with few exceptions.