The one thing being left out on all of these threads is what arbitration does accomplish and what it does not accomplish. What is does is a senioirty list. Period.
All the discussion in regards to how complicated the AIP is simply ironic. Especially those stating that is the reason they are voting no. The arbitrated solution, in the end, would be the most complicated and convoluted solution we could ever dream up.
Lets face it, the AIP is a big bill to swallow for both parties. If we want to discuss voting no and continuing to arbitration in a hypothetical sense, than lets discuss any and all implementation post arbitration. To be clear I am not referring to fear tactics and parking airplanes. I am pointing out the implementation process, who handles the implementation, bump and flush, fences, ect.
We need to all be honest here.