WyoHerkdriver
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 7, 2002
- Posts
- 110
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The point, pilotyip, is that those horrendous 100 seat rates (if left unchecked) are going to be used against us at the more established regionals where we are flying 50 seat jets for basically the same rate. It has nothing to do with whether or not one wants to go to jetBlue (I personally don't), but I do have a problem with management at our respective regionals now being able to pressure US to take concessions just because a rogue non-union company such as jetBlue has "set the standard" by accepting the same pay rates for a jet with twice the seats.pilotyip said:Fr all those who feel this rate is too low, do not apply, that will show them. There is a good chance those who do apply will be making way more at JB in three years than they would at one of places with those great 50 seat rates.
I gotta say, this is one of the more intelligent posts on this thread. At least blzr seems to have a clue....blzr said:Now, I wasn't born with a silver golf club up my but t, so I think 74k third year pay ain't all that bad for JB pilots. That's better than most Corp gigs I have seen. Is there any balance here at all? How about work rules, domiciles, schedules?? anybody got any of that info?
My take on this VERY unstable industry of ours is: "Which would you rather have, a little less pay for the long haul, or more pay for the short haul?" Seems to me that JB will be with us for the long haul.....??...., but who knows.
also, what are 4th, 5th, even 6th year pay on those things? please post if you find out.
Thanks
Talk about trying to stuff the genie back into the bottle!Otto Coarsen said:Though JB is non-union, I think it would only be a matter of time before ALPA sees the long-term benefits of incorporating new lower payscales for larger "small jets" owned by their respective Mainline carriers...