Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Is this profession in peril?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Lots of talk about this profession..... here are some points...

1. Is there a better profession? Who's got it better?
I would tentatively offer up that Dr. Ray in California has a better profession than I do, as do most successful plastic surgeons. Work 3-4 days per week, one or two day of consults and follow-ups, 2 days of surgery, and make $300-600k a year.

In this profession, no matter how good I am at my job, I'm not compensated any better.

2. Allot of this has to do with expectations. Do pilots readily objectively manage thier expectations?
Do pilots get advance notice of how badly this profession is going to take a nose-dive in terms of compensation packages? I don't recall getting a pre- 9/11 memo... did you?

Expectation management: I spent the first 25 years of my life watching what this career should be, got into it, then spent the last 10 watching it take a nose-dive. How should I have "managed my expectations" with 25 years of great salaries and QOL being my pre-disposition to airline life as my guide?

3. Finally, if one gives up on thier profession, what will keep them at thier next profession? Why will they be commited? Fact is.. this profession can be good. The good ol days were never that good... they are just believed to be...
Hmmm... let me think. I watched my Dad make $12,000 per month as an F/O, then $18,000 per month as a CA, both on the 737 (767 CA pay was $20k - 22k a month before the pay cuts), home 18+ days a month flying red-eyes back and forth to the West Coast with 30-35 hour overnights in those cities to play with.

The good 'ole days were never that good? Sell some of that to someone who didn't see the pay stubs or go with the old man on the overnights once a month.

Pilots are not unique in this regard... profession management or maintenence is required in all professions... but when you were thinking about being an Air Line Pilot... did that include thinking about democracy... voting, meeting attendence, education, etc...

no of course not...all you thought about was jets, days off, money, retriement, etc...in other words.... you wanted the reward... but never thought about the responsibility...

Oh you think.... passing your checkride and showing up on time is "responsibility"........???
You're absolutely right, but I don't blame the pay cuts and degradation of pay on the current membership.

A lot of that blame gets passed to the management as well as the senior half of the seniority list who stopped participating in their careers decades ago. Management saw, took advantage, and started a downward trend that we all want to stop.

THAT'S the whole point... CAN we reverse the trend and regain what's been lost? or will it EVER be as good as it was, when inflation is factored into the equation?

My bet is NO. Especially if ALPA can't adjust to changing times and find a better way to approach the problems. The age-old approach of "wait for release into self-help" doesn't work when it takes a decade to get there and, even then, you're unlikely to actually be allowed to walk.
 
Last edited:
I would tentatively offer up that Dr. Ray in California has a better profession than I do, as do most successful plastic surgeons. Work 3-4 days per week, one or two day of consults and follow-ups, 2 days of surgery, and make $300-600k a year.

I don't think the majority of pilots could compete in the high dollar world of plastic surgery. C'mon... compare what it takes to become a pilot and a doctor in terms of competition and education... most airline pilots couldn't cut it.... (no pun intended... :) )

In addition most doctors are NOT living the high life as a plastic dr. to the pretty CA people...

The insurance companies are controlling doctors..

Nice try....but BAD example...


In this profession, no matter how good I am at my job, I'm not compensated any better.

Plastic surgeons do elective surgury and are small business owners... very different from skilled hourly labor... after docotors are done cutting thier is still allot of work to do..managing the business.... aftrer you fly your trip do you want to go to the office and do more work?

Do pilots get advance notice of how badly this profession is going to take a nose-dive in terms of compensation packages? I don't recall getting a pre- 9/11 memo... did you?

Did docotors get a notice that mal-practice insurance was going to soar and make thier professions more difficult?

Our professional difficulties aren't unique... why should we be any different?

Expectation management: I spent the first 25 years of my life watching what this career should be, got into it, then spent the last 10 watching it take a nose-dive. How should I have "managed my expectations" with 25 years of great salaries and QOL being my pre-disposition to airline life as my guide?


Hmmm... let me think. I watched my Dad make $12,000 per month as an F/O, then $18,000 per month as a CA, both on the 737 (767 CA pay was $20k - 22k a month before the pay cuts), home 18+ days a month flying red-eyes back and forth to the West Coast with 30-35 hour overnights in those cities to play with.

The good 'ole days were never that good? Sell some of that to someone who didn't see the pay stubs or go with the old man on the overnights once a month.

Let's see...

Ever heard of Braniff?
PanAm?
Eastern?

these pilots got thier professions handed to them....

Pilots have ups and down with our free markets system for the entire course of the airline industry...

Look at the maritime industry....


You're absolutely right, but I don't blame the pay cuts and degradation of pay on the current membership.

A lot of that blame gets passed to the management as well as the senior half of the seniority list who stopped participating in their careers decades ago. Management saw, took advantage, and started a downward trend that we all want to stop.

THAT'S the whole point... CAN we reverse the trend and regain what's been lost? or will it EVER be as good as it was, when inflation is factored into the equation?

Well some of us are going to stick around and find out... work for positive change.. for those of you that intend to quit this profession because you want a better return ... go for it.... just don't get angry when Radj, Juan and Xiang welcome you aboard with thier call center accents...

the next cycle will determine that....


My bet is NO.

Then are you going to stick around or find another profession...


Especially if ALPA can't adjust to changing times and find a better way to approach the problems.

agreed. What do you suggest...

The age-old approach of "wait for release into self-help" doesn't work when it takes a decade to get there and, even then, you're unlikely to actually be allowed to walk.

That is just the way "those who control the distribution of wealth" like it..... why should it change?

If you had power and control for decades/centuries would you give it up? If so ...why?



Well said Lear!!
And Ditto!

Actually it wasn't well said... it sounded good but there is no pragmatic application or in depth understanding......

thus we spin our wheels....
 
I just love it when some kid who bought his job is the voice of ALPA and is lecturing a gent who has clearly been around. Priceless!
 
No Rez- you are correct. 100%- Every single one of us has a responsibility to participate in their union to the extent they are able. To educate themselves. To VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION IN A RESPONSIBLE WAY.

But you have your assumptions too. The First is that the vast majority of us do not do that. Clearly not enough- so i can appreciate your message- but to those who do participate- you never want to continue the dialogue. Everything is stopped at membership's participation. It gets very old when i'm doing everything that i'm empowered to do in my current situation. Yet leadership has been lacking for a long, long time. There are organizational behavior techniques that can fight apathy- but they aren't employed- why? The membership was clear on 65- yet clearly ALPA supported the legislation- are we supposed to follow that kind of leadership?

There can only be so many leaders- and they do have a responsibility to those who elected them and those they affect. Can you imagine if the average worker could not hold their congressman or President responsible for their actions?

What was well said is that the top half of seniority lists around the country has sold out the junior half and next generation at every step, to their own eventual detriment-- They need to start leading in a more positive and long term way. In the meantime- i'll be telling every pilot over the age of 50 that i do not appreciate the way they've conducted themselves over the past 15 years. They are the ones responsible for dividing us- and you're right Rez- it will be my generation that will have to pick up the pieces and repair it. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Regarding the issue of increased membership participation.....

1. What happens if everyone participates but they are equally divided on the issue.....Does the fact that everyone is participating resolve the more basic issue caused by the divided membership?

2. I contribute money to both the NRA and to AOPA.....I have absolutely no compaints with either of these two groups and most members of these two groups do not participate other than sending in money and reading the magazines.....Despite this, BOTH these groups do a very good job of defending the rights and interests of gun owners and general aviation.....How do they do this with little participation and less money from the members?

3.Are participation levels the same as unity?
 
I don't think the majority of pilots could compete in the high dollar world of plastic surgery. C'mon... compare what it takes to become a pilot and a doctor in terms of competition and education... most airline pilots couldn't cut it.... (no pun intended... :) )

In addition most doctors are NOT living the high life as a plastic dr. to the pretty CA people...

The insurance companies are controlling doctors..

Nice try....but BAD example...
Bad because it doesn't fit the point you were trying to make, not because it doesn't apply.

You asked the question: 1. Is there a better profession? Who's got it better?

You got an answer that PERFECTLY answered the question, EXACTLY as it was asked. You didn't qualify it by saying the same time in training, or any other such restriction.

Be careful what you ask for, you might get it and have no defense for it (like in this example).

Personally, I equate my professional level exactly to that of a specialized surgeon. I spent 4 years of college, 3 years afterwards getting my advanced ratings and getting basic on-the-job experience (CFI, CFII, MEI, flight instructing, then flying King Airs and getting my ATP), then another 9 years flying various jets, larger and more specialized, staying current and learning new equipment (EFIS, FMS, etc) until I finally got on with a major, then have to keep studying to maintain my skillset, occassionally learning new knowledge (new type rating) as I move forward.

If you don't want to value your professional skills as highly, that's your business.

Plastic surgeons do elective surgury and are small business owners... very different from skilled hourly labor... after docotors are done cutting thier is still allot of work to do..managing the business.... aftrer you fly your trip do you want to go to the office and do more work?
I often do, working 2 hours for every 1 I get paid. I doubt plastic surgeons do the same; they hire people to manage their offices if they're halfway successful. Why do I believe this? Because we have surgeons in our family. I see how they manage their businesses (2 of them are independent).

Did doctors get a notice that mal-practice insurance was going to soar and make thier professions more difficult?

Our professional difficulties aren't unique... why should we be any different?
Their malpractice insurance didn't cut their salaries in half, cut their retirement by 60-80%, and gut their retirement insurance benefits.

Somehow I fail to see the similarities in suffering.

Let's see...

Ever heard of Braniff?
PanAm?
Eastern?

these pilots got thier professions handed to them....

Pilots have ups and down with our free markets system for the entire course of the airline industry...

Look at the maritime industry....
Yep. 3 airlines failed. 7 major airlines were going great most of my life until 2000 or so. Not great odds but, again, if pilots believed their careers were going the way of Braniff, how many would join this marketplace to begin with?

As you said... you picked bad examples. No one plans to have a mediocre career because of an airline closure. You were talking about "managing expectations", not "planning for your airline to fail at age 50 and have no retirement or backup plan the last 10 years of your professional life".

Well some of us are going to stick around and find out... work for positive change.. for those of you that intend to quit this profession because you want a better return ... go for it.... just don't get angry when Radj, Juan and Xiang welcome you aboard with thier call center accents...
We weren't talking about ATC centers.

agreed. What do you suggest...
ALPA rearrange their priorities.

Instead of fighting so hard for upper wages, fight to limit the supply and mandate the minimum experience level of pilots, further restrict scope, and mandate a minimum compensation level for ALL carriers, and Prater (or whoever is in charge when they come time to ratify) refuses to allow them to be ratified (which is allowed per the ALPA bylaws), until they meet those minimum levels.

It would require some re-write of the bylaws to force ALPA National will on the individual MEC's, but that's what is going to be required to take the power away from the individual MEC's run by super-senior pilots and force change from the basics (limiting supply of pilots.

Next round, with a limited supply of pilots and tighter scope, you work on wages and retirement.

Withholding ALPA signature on any document that doesn't meet those minimum levels is going to anger the senior pilots at those airlines and will be hard, but if pilots can't help themselves by setting goals that help the industry and can't be bothered to take the initiative, then someone's going to have to do it for them, even if they don't like the results short-term.

That is just the way "those who control the distribution of wealth" like it..... why should it change?

If you had power and control for decades/centuries would you give it up? If so ...why?
This way you take it out of the control of the NMB as well as the individual MEC's and set policy "minimums" for all contracts moving forward.

Completely redesign the goals starting from the ground-up. The gulf is going to be VERY wide for this first contract, but there's NOTHING the NMB can do to force a change in ALPA policy. They can tell ALPA their demands are "unrealistic" for that carrier but, eventually, when that 10-year release point DOES come, the carrier will either cave and figure out how to compete with the new restrictions or it will die.

Then the next carrier takes the same hardline stance.

The time for half-measures has come and gone.

Actually it wasn't well said... it sounded good but there is no pragmatic application or in depth understanding......

thus we spin our wheels....
I have yet to see a realistic approach from ANY of the ALPA cheerleaders. I'm no longer involved in ALPA. You are. Why are YOU spinning your wheels?

Just because you don't like the answers doesn't automatically mean there is no in-depth understanding. What I see in people like you is that there is no true desire to fix the situation, despite how ugly the fix will be. And if it does get fixed (which I highly doubt), it WILL be ugly.

Personally, I'm calling this the "lost generation" of aviation; those who believed in the dream, worked hard to be a part of it, then watched their profession reduced to a shadow of its former self while they sat by powerless to change it as their union did nothing.
 
No Rez- you are correct. 100%- Every single one of us has a responsibility to participate in their union to the extent they are able. To educate themselves. To VOTE IN EVERY ELECTION IN A RESPONSIBLE WAY.

The only time voter particaption is at 90%+ is a section 6 TA. Of course we are talking about ones wallet.

LEC election rates are 35%. In line with congressional elections...

But you have your assumptions too. The First is that the vast majority of us do not do that. Clearly not enough- so i can appreciate your message- but to those who do participate- you never want to continue the dialogue.

If you are talking about National Seniority list... I have put up discussion that I have not seen you respond to..... is that what you mean...



Everything is stopped at membership's participation.

Entirely ...no... however, how far can you go on an empty tank? The membership is the fuel that moves the vehicle...


It gets very old when i'm doing everything that i'm empowered to do in my current situation. Yet leadership has been lacking for a long, long time.

Welcome to democracy. Without a doubt I am extremely disapointed with some of ALPAs ways... yes the leadership is lacking.. agreed...

One of the problems is the leadership conference in Feb.... it is not a leadership conference... it is a resource conference...

See a guy/gal gets elected to a union and the union doesn't provide union style leadership...


There are organizational behavior techniques that can fight apathy- but they aren't employed- why? The membership was clear on 65- yet clearly ALPA supported the legislation- are we supposed to follow that kind of leadership?

Democracy voted in Prater... lets start there...

For example.... what does one do if they didn't vote for Bush and didn't want an Iraq war..but got one...

That damm D word... democracy...

There can only be so many leaders- and they do have a responsibility to those who elected them and those they affect.

ahhh... but so does the membership... the membership has a responsibilty to elect responsible leaders..... when insisting on the responsibiities of others... don't forget your own...


Can you imagine if the average worker could not hold their congressman or President responsible for their actions?

I can't seem to hold Bush accountable....


What was well said is that the top half of seniority lists around the country has sold out the junior half and next generation at every step, to their own eventual detriment-- They need to start leading in a more positive and long term way.

Perhaps.... is that your peception? I thought every pilot had a vote. I mean its not like the good ol days when co-pilots only had 1/2 vote...

In the meantime- i'll be telling every pilot over the age of 50 that i do not appreciate the way they've conducted themselves over the past 15 years.

Why? Becuase they demcratically represented thier intrests? If the vote went your way and they were pissed and they came up to you and said.. "I don't appreciate the way you've....." how would you respond...??


They are the ones responsible for dividing us- and you're right Rez- it will be my generation that will have to pick up the pieces and repair it. Thanks.


Damm that democracy!! What were our founding fathers thinking of!!!


Just don't pack up your marbles and go home. That is what quitters do.


I get quite fustrated with ALPA.. and at times I want to just go home and forget it... but that means I give the "otherside" a free pass....

Sorry...democracy is slow, boring, fustrating and long... but until a better way comes along, I am staying at the table....
 
Well said Lear....

There is a difference between politicians and leaders....Very few politicians are leaders....

Blaiming the membership for the failures of the organization is not going to get more people involved.....Can anyone see the NRA or AOPA blaiming everything on it's members....
 
Rez- as a regional pilot- i did not have a say in releasing scope. Many of the mainline decisions affect their regional counterparts and every young pilot-Your actions very much have a say in what opportunities are available to younger pilots-. Neither do i have a voice now as a probationary pilot. Yet my career at the regionals was very much prolonged b/c 50/70/90 seat RJ's were allowed to grow OFF THE MAINLINE PROPERTY UNDER COMMUTER CONTRACTS- though they were clearly replacement jets for the AB/73/S80 type a/c. Tell me where i had a voice in that. Did all the guys who were furloughed so that regionals could grow have a vote?
You'll have to remind me which thread i didn't respond to on the seniority issue, Rez- sorry.
 
Well said Lear....

There is a difference between politicians and leaders....Very few politicians are leaders....

yet Americans, who bother to vote, still elect thos politicians and then complain they are not leaders... oh wait... that is you Joey...

Blaiming the membership for the failures of the organization is not going to get more people involved.....Can anyone see the NRA or AOPA blaiming everything on it's members....

The NRA and AOPA are hobby organization.... get real....:rolleyes:
 
Actually, I thought the NRA and AOPA are two excellent examples you've brought up.

They seem to accomplish quite a bit using lobbying power alone,,, however,,, they don't have a membership who has to vote on contracts.

ALPA could take a large lesson on how to manage their lobbying power effectively from these two organizations, but the issue still remains with how to fix your base problems when the membership is completely divided on goals and priorities.

From Senior CA's to Junior F/O's, from Legacy Carriers to Regional Affiliates, all represented by the same Collective Bargaining Agent. The "goal" *SHOULD* be to find a middle ground; unfortunately, and we all know it, the senior legacy CA's are the ones driving the bus...

That's why I'm glad that AAI has the NPA. For the first time I can remember in organized labor history, a T.A. was rejected in large part due to F/O wages and reserve pilot work rules. Certainly the CA's want more, but they are also supporting their F/O's, junior CA's on reserve, and new-hires.

If ALPA could show the same resolve and rebuild their strategy from the ground-up, they might actually be worth saving.
 
Rez- as a regional pilot- i did not have a say in releasing scope. Many of the mainline decisions affect their regional counterparts and every young pilot-Your actions very much have a say in what opportunities are available to younger pilots-.

Agreed, as regional pilots we are simply vendors who provide lift for the major brand...

Recall major airline can live without the regional... but the vice versa...




Neither do i have a voice now as a probationary pilot.

Do you see this as a problem? Now, if you had to pay dues, I think you could.



Yet my career at the regionals was very much prolonged b/c 50/70/90 seat RJ's were allowed to grow OFF THE MAINLINE PROPERTY UNDER COMMUTER CONTRACTS- though they were clearly replacement jets for the AB/73/S80 type a/c.

so you are saying that you'd go right into the majors if the regionals didn't exist?



Tell me where i had a voice in that. Did all the guys who were furloughed so that regionals could grow have a vote?

So you want furloughed guys to be able to vote? Should they pay dues?



You'll have to remind me which thread i didn't respond to on the seniority issue, Rez- sorry.

National Sen list.. a Pan Am pilot loses his B747 CA job when PanAM folds... you think he should go to UAL with Seniority and be a UAL B747 CA over all UAL pilots. If the Pan AM rate was higher than UAL should he get that too?
 
That's why I'm glad that AAI has the NPA.
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit. The NPA is the one thing holding us back. If we had a real union, you wouldn't be flying Lears right now.
 
I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit.
OK, that was funny...

The NPA is the one thing holding us back. If we had a real union, you wouldn't be flying Lears right now.
You don't believe that and neither do I. If I was at PCL and they had done this, PCL ALPA wouldn't have been able to do anything, either...

The difference is in the legal representation moving forward and how fast they can force it to arbitration. I don't believe having ALPA on property would force it any quicker and the NPA is helping me explore my legal options.

Can't say more until after April 2nd, maybe later, depending on a few things. Yes, I know that's after System Board, give me a call and I'll explain it, can't post more here.

Bottom line, I'm somewhat glad we're separated from ALPA until they get their house in order. Yes, their services and war chest are second-to-none and, yes, it's our pilots who made the difference on the last T.A., but watching AP and group was like a re-run of watching PCL ALPA - a bunch of senior guys knowing they were never going anywhere else and maneuvering to make the best of it for themselves... That's how ALPA works in general, at each individual MEC, and it needs to stop.
 
yet Americans, who bother to vote, still elect thos politicians and then complain they are not leaders... oh wait... that is you Joey...

Actually I wish fewer people actually voted....Most people don't educate themselves....they just vote based on sound bites and campaign posters....and even based on color or gender.....Many blacks are going to vote for Obama because he is black....many women are going to vote for Hillary because she is a woman.....If I voted for a white male because he was white or male....I would be a racist or a sexist.....But I digress.....

Most politicians are not leaders....The only leader I saw in the Presidential election that wasn't a politician was Ron Paul....That's who I voted for even though I don't agree with him on everything.....There were also eliments of leadership from Fred Thompson as he was the only one who wanted to address the pressing issue of entitlement programs.....or the third rail of politics...He was the one I supported until he dropped out.....

When I vote in November, I will vote for the lesser of two evils....and I will complain if they don't lead.....that is my right. Politicians get elected...leaders usually don't.....


Rez O. Lewshun said:
The NRA and AOPA are hobby organization.... get real....:rolleyes:

Actually the Second Amendment is more than just a hobby to most of us and it is General Aviation that gave me my start in this great profession....so I will never turn my back on it.....They are more than just "hobbies"....but I digress...

Regardless of what type of organization you want to classify them....there is no question that they are very powerful lobbies in Washington DC.....I would venture to say the average Congressman fears the NRA more than ALPA.....How is that given that most NRA members don't participate and the dues are far less....

How do they do it Rez?
 
Last edited:
Neither the NRA or AOPA are tied to your house payment...

....boy your debating skills are about as impressive as the rest of the Herndon clan.....

1. The second amendment is tied to my property....It is far more important than any of the issues we are debating here.....But I digress.....

2. General Aviation got me to where I am today which definately is tied to my house payment....I don't forget my roots....

3. ALPA doesn't really care about my house payments.....They aren't protecting my job.....If I don't pay them, they will cut off the source of my income which does pay my house payment...

4. You still haven't addressed the issue of how these two groups are so effective in DC with very little membership participation and cheaper dues.....You can side step with the best of them....

This is like shooting fish in a barrel....Your losing it Rez.....:laugh:
 
Last edited:
Joe, the NRA has 4.3 million members. We have 66,000. We have to work a lot harder to be anywhere near as effective in Washington. There is no comparison. Even AOPA has about 400,000+ members. And they aren't busy using their money to negotiate contracts and save people's jobs. They have a single focus: protecting their members' rights in DC. ALPA doesn't have the luxury of a single focus. We are being attacked from all sides.
 
Agreed, as regional pilots we are simply vendors who provide lift for the major brand...

Recall major airline can live without the regional... but the vice versa...
True. But what's your point? My point is that flying mainline routes w/ pilots of separate companies w/ separate lists undermines the seniority system.

Do you see this as a problem? Now, if you had to pay dues, I think you could.
Not particularly- but the practice doesn't recognize that pilots on the bottom of lists do move around- and are voiceless until they get a year in at a carrier.

so you are saying that you'd go right into the majors if the regionals didn't exist?
Depends on your definition of 'right in' -This is not about me, Rez- I'm fine- but there is NO DOUBT i would have been at a major years earlier if the regionals weren't given the ability to grow the 70-90 seat market- releasing scope this much is indefensible and has lengthened the career of the majority of pilots. (Even military- they either had to go to a regional or stay in to wait on the opportunity at a major while traffic was increasing at majors - but not on mainline a/c.

So you want furloughed guys to be able to vote? Should they pay dues?
The point of all this is that you rail on me for not participating. How could I? How could the vast majority of young pilots? We have been forced to count on the senior mainline pilots and there have been few times when we've been looked out for.

National Sen list.. a Pan Am pilot loses his B747 CA job when PanAM folds... you think he should go to UAL with Seniority and be a UAL B747 CA over all UAL pilots. If the Pan AM rate was higher than UAL should he get that too?
A national list would change the entire dynamic of our career. Everything would change. Especially how we bid. You could change companies w/o an airline going out of business... But yes- in your scenario- absolutely the PanAm guy would go whereever his seniority allowed him to go- to whatever company he chose- but remember every United pilot would also be building seniority equally- As long as the market for pilots in the country increased- everyone would have a job w/ their seniority. Note: The demand for aviation is predicted to grow rapidly between now and 2020. The demand for your current company may not be so lucky- Our leverage should be increasing- but it decreases b/c we are so concerned that whatever company we are employed by now remains and stays in it's current form. You said it perfectly on another thread- pilots don't run airlines- why do we give the most important aspect of our career over to management? It's dumb in an environment that changes as quickly as ours does. Think- a national seniority list means not caring if a company goes under- we'll do our best for you but can't be responsible for mismanagement- and then if it does we filter in to whoever fills in the gaps left behind. We don't need a national contract- Maybe that's an incentive for going to FedEx over United- more pay. Maybe you want more day flying- so you bid for United or Northwest- Maybe you just want to be LA based- you could bid the LA airlines in whatever your seniority could hold.
Everything would change.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top