Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Interesting day

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
cforst513 said:
did you guys not see in the video that one of the wheels was down but the other wasn't completely in place? how about landing on one wheel that's locked and spiraling once the opposite wing hit the ground?

The pilot should have learned how to do that. It should be in the Emergency checklist for the RG.

I'll chime in and say "no way" would I have done that.

But I'm a "kitty kat" so...there ya go.

-mini
 
So I was always taught to retract the gear and belly land, if one of the mains didn't extend (a blown main tire doesn't require a belly landing). You're controllable, and you don't ahve to worry about breaking open your wing fuel tanks, cartwheeling, etc. Still, whether or not you approve of the actions of these guys, they recovered the aircraft without incident. When the sh-t really hits the fan, you become awfully creative before you commit to bending metal.

I guess I'm trying to say that it's easy for all of us to play monday morning quarterback. Perhaps the Cessna pilot had lots time flying tight formation, like a skydiver pilot or something? Perhaps the driver of the Jeep knew what he was doing?

If airshow pilots get away with flying their Cubs while hanging off one of the struts, we should probably cut an innovative CFI some slack.
 
so here's a question on the logistics of the 737 that landed w/ one of the main gear up. how do you counteract the friction caused by that engine dragging on the ground? is the mass and momentum of that huge plane enough to keep it going in a straight line, or would it be more of trial-and-error (in the few seconds you're actually dragging the plane)? i wonder if rudder is the only thing that would be helpful in trying to keep the jet from going off the side of the runway.
 
rvsm410 said:
This was done one before somewhere here in Florida about 10 years ago I suspect. The guy was in a convertable and reached up and pulled the gear down with his hand...it was an Arrow...

Hi RSVM,

Yea, I remember the Arrow deal. They had a couple of guys in the back of the pickup truck. It took them 3 tries, but one of them finally grabbed the stuck main and yanked it down. They actually had some video of them doing it.

I remember a few years after that some news show (America's stupidest videos, or something like that), ran a bit on it. They tracked down all the people involved a did some interviews. The funny thing is that the CFI in the Arrow was the hardest to pin down, and it turns out he was a FO at CAL. They only way they got an interview with him was to do an "ambush" interview.

When they did, he looked totally mortified that this had resurrected itself, and he wanted to crawl under the nearest rock.

Nu
 
We complain out insurance rates, yet many are happy to just "belly it in and let the insurance folks deal with it". If I new the players involved, and had confidence, then I'd give it a shot too. This is the third time I've seen something like this done.
And, since some of you will ask, yes, I've driven underneath an aircraft flying 10' off the runway to inspect their wheels/gear --- on more than one occasion.

The insurance company should offer their thanks in the form of a reward to these folks.
 
Huggyu2 said:
The insurance company should offer their thanks in the form of a reward to these folks.

Reward stupidity, it's the American way!

I'd like to have some insurance people presented with the situation just to hear what they would want done. Maybe $100,000 for a totalled airplane vs. millions for the deaths that could result from a misjudgement. Other lawsuits would surely follow. Cessna for a making the airplane, Jeep for making a vehicle that can't outrun a Cessna. And don't forget the faulty rollbar that couldn't withstand a 2500 pound airplane landing on it!

"And, since some of you will ask, yes, I've driven underneath an aircraft flying 10' off the runway to inspect their wheels/gear --- on more than one occasion."

Did you also try to pull the gear down or were you just inspecting it? I would think there might be a bit more margin for error in that situation.
 
Last edited:
JimNtexas said:
Some Cardinal owners carry a retractable boat hook for this situation. Thats a long shot, but the risk is acceptable in my mind.

I won't tackle the debate as to whether this was a good or bad idea (partially because I wasn't there and don't have all the facts) but the Cardinal comment reminded me of a story I read some time back (in AOPA I believe). There was a 210 pilot whose gear failed to extend. Apparently all the hydraulic fluid had departed the aircraft sometime after the gear was retracted. So, realizing the problem (I believe that the nose gear came down via gravity or the tiny bit of fluid left in the system released the uplock or something like that, but the mains were still locked up) he set the auto pilot, crawled back to the main wheel wells (between the rear seat and baggage compartment), broke through the floor with a screw driver and manually released the uplocks. Then he grabbed his towbar and pulled the mains up into position. He subsequently landed safely. Sounds kind of like a MacGyver type move to me.
 
minitour said:
I'll chime in and say "no way" would I have done that.

But I'm a "kitty kat" so...there ya go.

-mini

mini....has Hollywood taught you nothing? :D

MFR
 

Latest resources

Back
Top