Rez O. Lewshun
Save the Profession
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2004
- Posts
- 13,422
Propblast said:I don't know about pounding on the chest but the bottom line was signing a contract with UAL would have been signing our own death sentence. The contract would have been for less flying than we had at the time (some had already been farmed out to mesa, tsa and others) so we would have furloughed immediately. The proposed contract actually had no term and allowed UAL to farm out our flying immediately - we we're the most expensive regional around at that time and they wanted to cut costs. That was the deal that UAL wanted the company to sign. At that point, IDE was the best option.
Your assertion that if we took a bit of a concession we would all have jobs today is just plain wrong. I think the DAL and NWA pilots who have taken concessions to preserve their companies are doing what they have to - are you comparing us and them? If so, you are comparing apples to Buicks. Supporting the decision to leave UAL was not a "FU!" decision - it was the lesser of two deals with a huge amount of risk for job loss.
-PB
the bottom line was signing a contract with UAL would have been signing our own death sentence.
This is your opinion. Is it fact based?
Fact is, in all probablility, on Jan 08, UAL and UAX will be flying, INDY will not. Is this not enough to understand that, even in hindsight, staying with UAL was the better choice.
The "proudest day of my life" Indy blue juice drinkers have the belief of....
signing a contract with UAL would have been signing our own death sentence.
When actually venturing out on your own was your own death sentence.
Supporting the employees, rejecting the Tom and Kerry Show.