Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

idiot congressman

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I still think Bush, Saddam, Osama, and Hilary Clinton are doing shots of Jaegermeister in the White House together.
 
I wonder if all these 'right' supporting pilots support labor unions? ...very socialistic.

Good question.

Labor unions have a place in some industries, and are a good tool to provide balance to the labor management equation. Not long ago, the Supreme court validated the idea that union members can legally withold the portion of their dues that unions use for purely political purposes. This is good news if you are a conservative, and don't wish to have your dues supporting a candidate whose political views you find objectionable.

Under this ruling, which came about under the situation I just described, "financial core" status is recognized by the union, which lowers your dues to the "financial core" amount the union needs to provide representation. I have some links I will post later, when I am back at my home.

Although you can provide union member service to your employer, the union (at least the SAG and AFTRA unions) sees you as a (get this) "dues paying non-member" who cannot come to meetings or vote, and cannot serve as an officer of the union. No doubt, this will be challenged as this ruling changes the face of unions everywhere.

There are several ideas we have in America that border on socialism. Some, like unions, are relatively benign. Eventually, only the government unions will remain in their current form.
 
Last edited:
TB - OMG, does that mean you support a socialist idea like a labor union? Your answer was long, but very vague.

I guess it's ok to support something like a labor union, but only if you benefit from it. It's all about me, me, me!
 
It's all about me, me, me!

It's all about the members acting together for the good of the membership. Sometimes, as we have seen in aviation, the only "good" goes to the upper end of the seniority roster. If you like that idea, that's fine. I found it to be counter productive when I was a member of a rail labor union.

I don't like the idea of closed shops, and the right to work states and the new "financial core" laws tend to make unions less socialistic then they were during the days of the Molly Maguires.

Unfortunately, some work is restricted to union membership. With finacial core, I can perform both union and nonunion work. That sounds more like capitalism to me.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top