El Chupacabra said:
This is true. You must stop trying to tell NJA pilots that they are not worth what they are asking. We will determine what that is.
As someone who has always said you guys have gone to work for too little and that's counterproductive, and hope you'll get higher salaries, I'll have to agree with G4dude that it's the utterly rational marketplace that has the final say on whether what you believe you are worth is viable in your current position. Regardless of what you believe, the fractional scheme is a business model, and all business models in any industry are are in turn only viable depending on other outside, changing factors beyond your control and some that are. The fractional scheme serves a niche in the market, and as a for-profit business the costs of providing the service determines to a large degree how large or small that niche becomes. Keep in mine that NJA isn't the only player in that niche either.
It doesn't really matter what drives the costs up, but labor costs are indeed one of them. Unlike the airlines which need to staff heavily to make an aircraft fly even on a known, set schedule, pilot wages represent a healthy proportion of the labor costs in the fractional scheme due to the nature of what they sell; private on-demand air travel to any destination 24//7/365 while remaining within legality limits of duty times, etc. This means pilot coverage which translates into appx. 4.5 pilots per aircraft. Unlike the airlines, other personnel requirements such as ground handlers, huge numbers of F/As, baggage service, etc. etc. aren't needed to get the job done to the customer's satisfaction.
In comparison to your situation where you can sit at home drawing salary while 3.5 of your peers are getting paid to man the same switch, corporate flight departments where higher salaries exist are considered well-staffed with 3 pilots per aircraft, many have only 2, and a few (which I don't condone) hire one full-time and rely on contract workers. The need for support staff is streamlined, since although the scope of operations is far-flung, it's an internal, linear exercize focusing on a few aircraft, not broad-based like NJA's which must provide service to any of many thousands of customers who are contractually guaranteed they can just pick up the phone on a whim and an aircraft will be there in x amount of hours. Most importantly, a corporate flight department is not a for-profit operation; the flying in itself does not generate direct revenue. Unlike them, if NJA or any fractional doesn't develop new repeat customers, it will cease to exist.
Given these realities, and focusing on the final point regarding customers, it's they who will decide whether the model is viable by their willingness to sign the contract of "ownership". Because fractional serves a niche customers (and most are well-aware of what that niche is), if their needs fall much outside what makes economic sense (let alone other considerations they may find important), they'll charter aircraft instead, or simply operate their own private flight department. If they choose the latter because their useage falls above the high-end of the fractional niche, they can pay much higher salaries to their own pilots and still come out ahead on the ledger sheet because of lessened staffing requirements. That's where a lot of the discrepancy between corporate pilot salaries vs. fractional come in as well as issues of retention and individual companies' policies regarding wage increases for all their employees, not just the pilots.
So go for higher salaries by all means, you deserve it. But for those that don't want to burn the house down, temper the emotion and remember that the market is rational, and higher costs for the customer will also mean shrinking the niche delved out a heartless "markeplace". If the fractional scheme existed in an aviation vacumn, 4.5 150K per/year Ultra pilots per aircraft might work assuming other members of the labor force could be persuaded to maintain that standard. But the real world isn't a vacumn, and very few customers will be willing to support those costs because other alternatives exist, and their economic desirablity would squeeze the limits of the fractional niche down to nothing.
Just food for thought, and pointing out that a smaller niche = fewer jobs. Therefore the question (for those not willing to wield the burn-down torch) is not only "What do I think I'm worth", but also "What do the customers think my company's services are worth?". Customers ultimately decide how many jobs there will be, and unfortunately, your customers don't actually need you to provide what they want, you just happen to do it at the best price. Because they are well-heeled, they are about the least-captive customer base you can target. So like it or not, you're all in it together...pilots, management, everyone else. You play an integral role, but you're also an integral cost in a for-profit business.
Good luck. Staying rational will increase your chances of being lucky.