Yeah, but you didn't want real competition. You wanted competition only on turf that you already dominate. Speaking of weak. Has it occurred to you that deciding what airports to serve is part of the airline competition?Pretty basic part of the business man. Again, ridiculous we were forced to make our case at all. Did you see SAT or AUS holding such hearings?
That's pretty darn funny! Yes, the competitiion at IAH is not real... It's pretend. Seriously?
Weak, eh?
Hmm-
Go on with your anonymous self-
Who made a mockery of anything? I know who we have working here at SWA- and GK is the leader and strongest of a team and family of strong players.
But youre strange analogy is not my point -
It's weak that government was involved this much at all.
IMHO, you're an insult to what he did and who he did it for. You don't deserve a CEO that good if you can't see it. Here is the deal: GK knows this still is not over (although even I will acknowledge that GK will get it done). This still has to pass the City Council officially, then the FAA could get involved. And they might say no. I know its hard for you to imagine our govt (BTW: get ready for other govts as well) getting involved in our industry, but that's how it goes. I realize SWA was launched off a napkin and had it's original operating authority granted on a one page letter from the state of Texas, but that's not normal. If he starts acting like you, this deal is over before it actually gets started.
Last edited: