Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Here we go LUV!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skybus
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 21

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Too bad the company has to fly airplanes. If they didn't they would be making tons on money. See $500 million dollar gain from fuel hedging. I am not sure how good this news really is. Don't get me wrong, profits ARE good news. Especially right now. Congrats.
 
And employing 30,000+ with benefits, good wages, profitsharing, 401(k) that is matched by the company, no furloughs......the list goes on.

I guess they really do not know what they are doing.

Any better anywhere else? This sounds like good news compared to the rest of the industry.
 
LUV got lucky is all.

They hedged for different reasons than having a crystal ball telling them oil would be $140 a barrel. Success in this industry is no longer about a solid business plan.

I will say that LUV made their luck.
 
Too bad the company has to fly airplanes. If they didn't they would be making tons on money. See $500 million dollar gain from fuel hedging. I am not sure how good this news really is. Don't get me wrong, profits ARE good news. Especially right now. Congrats.

Seriously, don't speak on that which you have no knowledge. Ask yourself this:

Where does the money to buy the hedges come from?

How can people make statements like this quarter after quarter? Has SWA invented a financial self licking ice cream cone? A fuel hedges driven perpetual motion machine? Or is it possible that the hedges are part of a business strategy that is designed to survive a declining economy as well as flourish a prosperous one?

Can't wait to read the same stupid comments next quarter ...
 
When oil was $40 a barrel and they hedged for $50 I heard the bean counterman who did it almost got fired. Guess he is a hero overthere now.

I will give you guys credit for having the spare cash to hedge when most companies were struggling.

For the legacies this has been the most shortlived turnaround. I think the hiring lasted less than a year.
 
Last edited:
"I heard" great source.

It is true some of the stupidest comments are related to people who just can figure SWA out. Good Luck with that.
 
You can bet the Management will not paint too pretty of a picture because the Pilot, FA's, rampers/agents and MX contracts are all in the works. The thing about no growth in 2009 is a shot at the pilot groupl because the company wanted to trade "growth for a pay freeze".
 
It's not about spare cash, it's about smart bets....

When oil was $40 a barrel and they hedged for $50 I heard the bean counterman who did it almost got fired. Guess he is a hero overthere now.

I will give you guys credit for having the spare cash to hedge when most companies were struggling.

For the legacies this has been the most shortlived turnaround. I think the hiring lasted less than a year.

Actually, the hedges they have in place now are so valuable, the counter parties have to deposit huge sums of cash with SWA to ensure that the opposite bet is still good. This credit/ cash infusion allows the program to keep churning the investments for the future. Success breeds success. Obviously the only thing that could derail the program would be for oil to drop to $40 / barrell again, but then they would be paying a lot less on the fuel bill. Like Kelly said in the article, this insurance is less risky than going without hedges which is much more risky.
Bravo
 
The only reason SWA has been making profits in todays 120-140 dollar per barrel oil industry is because of their hedges.

If it wasn't for the hedges, they'd lose money.


And keep in mind that SWA being paid well and now are the highest paid pax pilots has everything to do with the fact that the legacies all took termendous paycuts after 9/11, to the point where SWA wages are higher than even a 747 Captain at a legacy.

And, before 9/11, whether you like it or not, SWA was considered a 'second' tier airline to end up at, and everyone's first choice was a legacy carrier.

How things change..........................
 
Last edited:
The only reason SWA has been making profits in todays 120-140 dollar per barrel oil industry is because of their hedges.

If it wasn't for the hedges, they'd lose money.


And keep in mind that SWA being paid well and now are the highest paid pax pilots has everything to do with the fact that the legacies all took termendous paycuts after 9/11, to the point where SWA wages are higher than even a 747 Captain at a legacy.

And, before 9/11, whether you like it or not, SWA was considered a 'second' tier airline to end up at, and everyone's first choice was a legacy carrier.

How things change..........................


Not sure things have changed at all.....first choice for alot is still a legacy for personal reasons....they are just not hiring....can't do much about that. And some folks first choice is SWA. Sometimes the best airline out there is the one that hires you....
 
1015, You just don't get it.

SWA since the early 90's. Made as much or more than my contemperaries hired at the same time or even earlier at legacy carriers. Pay per hour was less, yes, but I flew much more and pretty much the same number of days.

It is shortsided to focus only on the pay rate rather than pay per day. Some do not wish to work as much and that is okay. But the efficiency that is lost when more pilots (pay+benefits) are required to do a similar amount of flying has the net result in putting job security at risk.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom