joeg252 said:
Why don't people just flight instruct to build up enough time to go to a regional, and not just simply pay for a right seat position in a Beech 1900. I don't think anyone under at least 1,000 hours belongs on an aircraft carrying paxs., unless your Gods gift to aviation. I really enjoy flight instructing and get satisfaction from it when I put someone up for there chekride and they pass. Yeah its scary when a private student puts you in a cross controlled stall 300ft. above the deck, but it builds character(LOL). I would'nt trade for the world, I know my time will come when I get to sit in something that burns Jet A, but for now I'll wait my time out flight instructing.
I may be walking into the fire here but...
I don't agree with PFT. It ain't right! Now, I may be reading into your post too far. I have less than 1000 hrs. I fly passengers around. You have less than 1000 hrs, you have probably flown a non pilot, therefore a passenger, around. I had a friend that I went to school with that got hired at a regional with less than 500hrs (in 2003). He didn't PFT. I don't feel that I'm gods gift to aviation. I learn everyday. But I do feel, that total time is not the best stick to measure a pilot with. The guy that has 3000hrs of banner tow time is a better qualified pilot than some 400hr MEI? No, I don't think so. I know I may be arguing a losing battle, I know that pilots will never be judged by the
quality and not the
quantity of their time. It will never happen. I put in 1.5 yrs instructing, loved every minute of it, and I would have no problem doing it again. I had the opportunity to go fly banners and build total time, or go fly corporate (my career goal) and do what I want to do flying terrific equipment, I chose the latter. I am a low time pilot, yet my skills were still that to get a type rating and to not be fired (I wouldn't be where I am if I couldn't fly an airplane or if I couldn't make sound decisions). Obviously low time pilots can be just as competent as high time pilots. I do realize that at less than 1000 hrs, I'm not captain material...yet. I am still learning the hardest thing to learn. Decision making skills, and we're all learning those everyday. Then we get into the argument, is there an "hour threshold" through which you pass when you can be considered a "pilot" without people saying, "oh, you're
low time."? I don't know. I've been flying at this corporate job for over a year now. I fly around 350hrs a year. At that rate it will take me nearly 2 more years before I get my ATP. I could have gone and flown banners for a year or two, come out with over 2000 hrs, but would I be a better pilot after two years of flying banners than I am right now after 1 year of flying jets and turbo-props and obtaining a type rating? I don't think so, but still, the 2000hr banner pilot looks at me as though I'm not worthy to fly the equipment I do. If I was at this job that I have now with 2000hrs, people wouldn't act surprised when they ask me what my TT is. But with my current situation, they look surprised. I hate trying to justify my right to be there because someone thinks that a 900hr pilot shouldn't be flying a jet. The people I am talking to are other pilots you run into at FBO's. The guys at our company are great. I went to school with a new Falcon 10 capt. He was just upgrading to capt in the 10. He has less than a quarter of the time I have in the airplane. He doesn't have an attitude about it, he knows I have more experience in the airplane and that I fly it better than he does (he told me this) and he has come to me on several occasions with operational questions. He doesn't see TT, he sees experience and he uses me as a resource. It's nice for a lowly FO to teach a captain something once in a while.
man, this turned into a rant, my apologies.