Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
GulfGuy from the porn lounge, please pm me. I have something private I would like to tell you about my personal experience with FW.
Why? Do you think he cares? He chooses to insult, in an effort to sound 'reasonable' and 'intellectual', a significant portion of the pilot group (bigger than the porn lounge, vuh or even yammer) who choos to read this site to find out what's really going on. Whatever information you choose to give him probably won't pull his head out of his ass. Do you really think knowing FW knows his identity he will do anything about it?
Regarding flight info, even though comments are relatively few in comparison to the curiosity, views blow those other sites away.
That fact speaks to a pilot group that is still gunshy about showing their unmasked support to either side. A guy with a real finger on the pulse of the pilot group should realize this but instead he insults them.
While I personally do not condone the suggestion of a black ball list etc. It is significant that a portion of the group does and feels strongly enough they choose to post about it. Both FW and "gulfguy" ought to take off the pretentious hat and realize the fact these decert guys are that hated says something.
The union is like Trump. Very few people are willing to throw their public support to him, even in answering an anonymous poll, but the facts about how people feel about the work being done speaks for itself. More pilots support representation than don't. The porn lounge is nothing more than Fake News.
Remember: sending in a card for decert is essentially a vote to lose all representation. Gulf guy is just helping Frank fool people we will get an in-house union from it. We won't.
The FW's of this world are not going to help you when KR says you are fired, they will tell you you were wrong. That is why we have the IBT1108 to bat for us. They have very experienced people who know how to deal with the Onesky management who going way back are skilled at misleading the pilot group with false promises and favouritism. As pilots I think we have enough to think about just doing the job of flying because that is what we do best and leave the complicated practices of the legal system to the IBT1108 because that is what they do best. Unless KR's foot is held in the fire he will not agree to anything.
Do you think the in-house pilot group will push the limits when KR is taking advantage once the Union protection is gone? I don't think so, they will agree with anything and everything so they don't lose they "position".
Volunteer to do something....what does that mean? No direction...you need IBT1108 who can give you direction. You will get no takers as they all want to be under the radar...nameless. How can you have an un named team to back you up. The guys who were named and pushed for the union because they thought you were worth it. Don't let them down.From what I'm reading, GGuy is in support of a union. You reading that differently?
- - - Updated - - -
I totally agree with you, except I think everyone should volunteer to do something so that none of us have to do everything. Get involved!
Volunteer to do something....what does that mean? No direction...you need IBT1108 who can give you direction. You will get no takers as they all want to be under the radar...nameless. How can you have an un named team to back you up. The guys who were named and pushed for the union because they thought you were worth it. Don't let them down.
If this protection is lost it will be gone for good. Remember that every airline has a union because it works and is good for the protection of both sides.
From what I'm reading, GGuy is in support of a union. You reading that differently?
Fair enough. But I’m happy that at least he isn’t just walking in jackbooted lockstep with wookieboy.
Gulfguy is still at it. Now he’s putting PD on the spot. Someone find out who this guy is and buy him a beer!
I have gotten notifications to threads that I’m subscribed to only to go read them and there would be nothing there. I guess your post explains that.
Frank has refused to post several of my messages. He claims only 1 post has ever been denied but I can tell you for a fact that is untrue.
The interesting part is I am inclined toward an in house union. My intended posts reflects it. I was anti union until I caught Handshuch in a huge lie that effected me personally. He was spreading his usual gossip and attributed a false statement to me resulted in the loss of a long term friendship because the other person could not believe he would lie.
I was paired with someone who was pro union not too long ago. He brought up a great point I wanted to ask Frank about. It was how could I trust Frank to stand up for me when there is video evidence Frank cannot stand up for pilots. During the original video Frank sat there and did nothing when Mr. Ricci said some pretty crazy and disrespectful things about our pilots, our owners and others.
As distasteful as it might seem the reality is we do not want a union that has a friendly relationship with management. Respectful yes but never friendly.
I would like to know if Frank really has it in him to be willing to get on management's bad side. Because if he isn't a least willing to foresee the possibility then he would not be a good choice.
I am inclined to do as little as possible is my point. I don't like the constant tension but I do realize it is managedment created tension. It's obvious Mr. Ricci will never deal fairly with the Teamsters so maybe a change is good if any other union would result in less tension.Frank and Phil and that group dont want to run a union, a vote for them is a vote to cancel the union all together. As far as an in house union, just a little simple math will show we dont have the numbers
I am inclined to do as little as possible is my point. I don't like the constant tension but I do realize it is managedment created tension. It's obvious Mr. Ricci will never deal fairly with the Teamsters so maybe a change is good if any other union would result in less tension.
Frank had made it obvious his idea is not possible for the simple fact we definitely need a union and it would appear he is not willing to do the uncomfortable things a union must do. No union is absolutely not a possibility.
I think it's a good question to ask. Has Frank or Phil shown they are willing to do the uncomfortable for us? Not at all. I think sometime the Teamsters have gone too far but at least they've gone somewhere. Too much fire is better than none at all in this case.
From your above post, please elaborate on “his idea”.