Well fook. The last time I checked about 50% of Lakes' passenger revenue is tied to United. The other 50% is mixed between sales from F9 and the ZK code. Then EAS money throws in about a dollar for every three that the passenger paid.
ORD is no more, it's not a factor. MSP is very quiet, but exclusively UA codeshare. Every Denver city, like 33 of them, carries both the UA and F9 code. Without the UA code that portion of the traffic wouldn't vanish entirely, but would be severely impacted. It's just a matter of whether the passenger in Bumfuk, Nebraksa cares enough to buy an interline, check in twice, painfully priced, separate ticket. My wild ass guess is that 70% of the formerly United traffic would be frightened away. Our pax are always threatening to drive anyway. Telluride, Pierre, Casper, and Williston-Dickinson are great routes that could probably still be justified. But Scottsbluff and the several dozen other useless cities Lakes serves, I dunno. The annual report filed in March and the latest 10Q were full of sketchy phrases, "it is uncertain whether the company can meet obligations," and "without securing additional financing, the world will end," etc., etc.
Hey Lakers, I assume that the June 1st furloughs did take place. Any more scheduled that those of us on the street may not have heard about? This would be apart from any impending cotastrophe.