Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If a degree is just a "check the box" item for you, then you are simply missing the point, although I back bobby's opinion that a pilot candidate with a degree has a better shot at getting a job than one without, box-checking notwithstanding.350DRIVER said:That college degree does not make one any safer, better, or a more well rounded pilot, in reality it simply allows you to fill in the box on the application, nothing more and nothing less.
The real question is how "sharp" would the degreed pilots be if they had not been to college, and how "sharp" could the non-degreed pilots be if they had attended. I suppose that the answer to this lies in one thing that pilotyip stated a little while back--it is up to the individual; I have seen many a college student squander their opportunities for learning, merely doing the bare minimum to get through their classes. At the same time, I have seen many non-college student types show superior intelligence and resourcefulness (my claim was never that those two attributes were exclusive to college attendees.)350DRIVER said:I have flown with many pilots who haven't attended a single college class and they were just as sharp as those with the degree. I can't even believe I am taking the time to respond to this, it is insane.
I absolutely agree.350Driver said:Degree or no degree you are still required to show a certain level of competence and ability regardless of whether or not you have that piece of paper.
Yes, but hired where? If one wants the best possible job, then they must posess the best possible credentials. There is a not-so-subtle difference between absolute hiring minimums and competetive minimums.350driver said:Many have been hired without the degree and many more will be, the trend won't be coming to an end anytime soon...but if you are unable then don't think for one second that you will not get hired within this industry, that would be nonsense to buy into that.
No doubt about it. But, I still maintain that anything one can do to improve one's analytical and critical thinking skills can do nothing but improve one's piloting skills. I certainly learned a lot about critical thinking in college, which, I feel has served me during my life and especially while flying. I still remember the talk my instructor gave me about how learning to fly is a course in decision-making, so, I like to feel that those skills were somewhat developed before I started to fly.qmaster3 said:A good friend of mine is a one of those dreaded non-degreed retired US Air types. I can assure you he educated many degreed aviators on the line. Yes, he can make decisions in the bird when those critical moments that we all hate pop up.
Goose, I don't think I am missing the point here at all... I am merely stating that a non-degreed pilot still has opportunity from within this industry to get hired, it happens every day. As I have stated on numerous occasions, I have nothing against the degree and I am all for people who have the financial means, time, etc, to continue on and get the degree, more power to them. I just don't buy into when someone attempts to tell me that a pilot without a degree is less of a skilled pilot and lacks in making "critical decisions" as one poster put it. The degree has nothing to do with your ability to safely and competently operate a piece of equipment.If a degree is just a "check the box" item for you, then you are simply missing the point, although I back bobby's opinion that a pilot candidate with a degree has a better shot at getting a job than one without, box-checking notwithstanding.
I think this is more up to the pilot's background, experience, and flying job history more so than whether they have the degree or not. You could have obtained a PHD, still isn't going to make you a better or safer pilot without real world experience. A better well versed and marketable pilot on paper?. I could probably agree with that but I would take the 5000 hour non-degreed pilot with 1500 turbine pic any day of the week over the PHD with minimal flight experience.The real question is how "sharp" would the degreed pilots be if they had not been to college, and how "sharp" could the non-degreed pilots be if they had attended. I suppose that the answer to this lies in one thing that pilotyip stated a little while back--it is up to the individual; I have seen many a college student squander their opportunities for learning, merely doing the bare minimum to get through their classes. At the same time, I have seen many non-college student types show superior intelligence and resourcefulness (my claim was never that those two attributes were exclusive to college attendees.)
I could not disagree with the above, very well put. The degree does allow one to be more "marketable" on paper, I have always said this.My point: College provides almost limitless opportunities for learning, growth, maturity, and refining of judgement if those opportunities are taken full advantage of. And gaining those skills and attributes is something that I feel is in everyone's long-term best interest, to say nothing of increased employability and competitiveness in the job market. This applies no matter what career field is chosen.
Where?. It happens at many places. Quite a few regionals, some majors, many 91/135 flight departments.Yes, but hired where? If one wants the best possible job, then they must posess the best possible credentials. There is a not-so-subtle difference between absolute hiring minimums and competetive minimums.
No one "attempted" to tell you that. My claim is that education is relative, and that everyone is at a different phase, and that I am a much better pilot than I would have been because of my college education. I fail to see how an expanded knowledge base and skill set would hinder a person, regardless of where their current flying abilities stand. Everyone can improve.350DRIVER said:I just don't buy into when someone attempts to tell me that a pilot without a degree is less of a skilled pilot and lacks in making "critical decisions" as one poster put it. The degree has nothing to do with your ability to safely and competently operate a piece of equipment.
Ahem, this may shoot holes all over my argument, but I can think of a dozen PhDs that I wouldn't trust within 50 yds. of an airplane. And I say that as a CFI and a college graduate.350DRIVER said:You could have obtained a PHD, still isn't going to make you a better or safer pilot without real world experience. A better well versed and marketable pilot on paper?. I could probably agree with that but I would take the 5000 hour non-degreed pilot with 1500 turbine pic any day of the week over the PHD with minimal flight experience.
This board, and life in general.350DRIVER said:Take things with a grain of salt that you read on this board.
(emphasis added)Goose Egg said:[W]ith all of you guys constantly moaning and groaning about how hard it is to make a living in this business and how competetive it is, I would seek every advantage to make myself attractive to an employer. And some folks here actively promote to the younger members of the forum that they should not participate in an activity, i.e. a college education, that increases their likelihood of getting their desired job, and I think it is reckless and irresponsible. Face it, 4 years is going to go by regardless, and no one is going to get a TJPIC job right out of high school... or college for that matter.
Forget not having a "plan B" with an aviation degree. Try falling back on a high school education . . . .