Mel Sharples said:
No, dude. YOU are missing the point.
YOU were the one that started saying flying a glider has nothing to do with 121 airline flying. No one here ever said a gliding CRJ is exactly the same as a glider.
Check the above posts, someone did mention the CRJ glider incident. It appears to be a lame attempt at drawing parallels between the two.
Mel Sharples said:
YOU made the broad observation that flying a glider does nothing for someone learning to fly at an airline. Is it the same? Obviously not. But will it help? Of course. If not, we would train all pilots on desktop sims and then throw them into training.
Couldn't the same be said about desktop sims? Is it the same? Obviously not. But will it help? Of course. Oddly that time isn't counted either.
Please quote me where I said that glider flying does NOTHING?
Answer this though, what unique aspects of glider flying are relivient to powered commercial flying? Don't say stick and rudder skills as those can be honed just as well with tail draggers or other similar powered flight trainers. Does a glider pilot understand or have higher proficiency with power management? P-Factor? Slipstream? ...or other powered flight aerodynamics? Please feel free to justify how those unique glider skills relate.
It's a pitch and power industry where as gliders only deal with pitch.
Mel Sharples said:
Far too many pilots don't put enough emphasis on basic flying skills. The more advanced the planes get the worse the "stick and rudder" skills get.
And that is related to this topic how? News flash, stick and rudder skills aren't unique to gliders.
Mel Sharples said:
Ask the Air Canada pilots who dead-sticked the 767 down to a safe landing if aerodynamics matter. Yes, it is not made to glide, but when you have no power it is the aerodynamic skill that may save your life.
Holding best glide doesn't take a rocket scientist. Is that all you can come up with? Glider flying will pay off ten-fold if you should find yourself in that 1-in-a-million position of a dual engine failure?
Again, you continue to spout on about aerodynamics as if that is unique to glider flying. Not only that but you seem to miss that powered aircraft aerodynamics are different than glider aerodynamics. As many world air forces did for their pilots, basic flight was taught through glider training but that was only the first step. From that they advanced into powered aircraft, gliders were a building block. With the eventual goal of a powered flight pilot does another 500 hours in the glider pay off with bigger returns in the end?
There is a reason that the POH for a Blanik is only a fraction that of a Beechcraft.