Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Gen. Petraeus p*sses off the AF

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DaveGriffin

Registered Self-Abuser
Joined
Nov 29, 2001
Posts
569
Here's a whinning editorial from airforce-magazine.com/. It looks like Gen. Petraeus really twisted the panties of our brothers in blue.


Beyond Outrageous
CENTCOM boss takes mindless shot at USAF.


August 19, 2009—"Joking" comments of Army Gen. David Petraeus, the commander of US Central Command, during his presentation at the Marine Corps Association Foundation dinner on July 30 belittled the contributions of the Air Force to the joint force.
In his prepared remarks, Petraeus said: "Then, of course, 25,000 feet above them [soldiers and marines], an Air Force pilot flips aside his ponytail and looks down at them through his cockpit as he flies over. 'Boy,' he radios his wingman, 'It must be tough down there.' "
We reviewed the video to get his actual remarks and found he embellished his "joke," changing the altitude to 30,000 feet and saying, "… an Air Force pilot flips aside his ponytail—I don't know how that got in there; I know they haven't had ponytails in a year or two—and looks down … ."
Petraeus, as leader of CENTCOM, the joint force charged with running operations in Southwest Asia, should have known better than to make such disparaging remarks, even in jest. Certainly, his handlers at CENTCOM finally realized the effect they would have—they excised that part of his remarks from the version on the CENTCOM Web site. (We found the original version—along with the video—still posted on Aug. 19 at the Marine Corps Association Web site.)
In all fairness, early in his actual remarks, Petraeus did offer this joint praise, saying, "The best examples of true importance have been found in our soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines who have deployed in harm's way."
However, those words do not alleviate the offensiveness—and un-jointness—of his later comments. They are symptomatic of the long-held belief of many ground commanders that airpower is no longer, if it ever was, relevant. (Read Fraudulent Flak from the September 2000 Air Force Magazine.)

Here's the entire section from Petraeus' remarks with the "joke" as given at the dinner:

"Come to think of it, in fact another bedrock element of the Marine Corps is unquestionably having the best recruiting ads on television. [Laughter] But this concept is not just an advertisement. The marines' sense of toughness permeates the Corps' lore as well as its reality. To recall an illustrative story, a soldier is trudging through the muck in the midst of a downpour with a 60-pound rucksack on his back. This is tough, he thinks to himself. Just ahead of him trudges an Army ranger with an 80-pound pack on his back. This is really tough, he thinks. And ahead of him is a Marine with a 90-pound pack on, and he thinks to himself, I love how tough this is. [laughter, applause] Then, of course, 30,000 feet above them — [laughter] — 30,000 feet above them an Air Force pilot flips aside his ponytail. [laughter, applause] Now — I'm sorry. I don't know how that got in there — [laughter] — I know they haven't had ponytails in a year or two — [laughter] — and looks down at them through his cockpit as he flies over. Boy, he radios his wingman, it must be tough down there. [laughter] Well, TV commercials and all joking aside, we've all seen that marines truly and consistently live up to their reputation."
 
Funny, on the US CENTCOM webpage, this speech is there. However, for some funny reason, the part about the USAF and the pony tail doesn't appear?
 
Dave,
Seems that editorial is written by those who have no real affiliation with the USAF, or the military...

Kind of like you.
 
Dave,
Seems that editorial is written by those who have no real affiliation with the USAF, or the military...

Kind of like you.

Huggy,

WTF are you talking about? After 0100 is too late for you to post.

We all know you AF prima donnas ain't the sharpest knives in the drawer, but at least you can try to keep up with the easy stuff.

The editorial was written by the AF Times writers b*tchin' about how mean Gen. Petraeus is to make fun of the jet jocks ponytails.


C40_Pilot

"Funny, on the US CENTCOM webpage, this speech is there. However, for some funny reason, the part about the USAF and the pony tail doesn't appear?"

I know it's really hard, but read the editorial. It answers you questions in the 5th sentence.
 
Like I said, the AF Pravda Times is simply another jounalistic piece. While a couple of their staff had military backgrounds, don't let it fool you: they are journalists of the 21st century. Why research an issue when you can publish it emotionally?
 
Dave,

What is your problem? It seems that every post you start is AF bashing. Why don't you take that C-130 Combat Talon off your rating? Seems pretty funny to me that you have some obsession with calling out the AF but the only thing you can put on your profile is jumping out of an AF plane.
I don't remember Navy guys having any problems with AF guys when they were riding in the back of our airplanes.

I think your constant needling reflects poorly on you and you alone.
 
i say we start pulling out ac-130 missions so when army and marines call for help we wont be there. make fun of the air force then. and start pulling c-17 missions so you dont get your tanks. or start pulling out a-10 missions so those hodgies in front of you keep shooting at your ass....
 
This is a take off of an old cartoon that floated around before the age of the Internet. The various degrees of suck are posed in sequential cartoon boxes, then it flashes the last box where an UASF pilot in his motel room, with a cold beer, a pre-diem check, and a comment about not having the HBO channel on the TV, "What no HBO, now this really sucks" Back in the 70’s having stayed in USAF BOQ’s deemed inadequate by the USAF that were 100 times better than living on a ship, I found it funny. Doesn't the USAF have a sense of humor?
 
Last edited:
None of the people I know -- who are the exact people that Petraeus was making fun of -- thought the joke was offensive.

Maybe some of the thin-skinned AF types who all ready have a chip on their shoulder (you know, the ones who keep telling everyone that "everyone is a warrior!") were offended by this. The people who have actually used kinetic force to kill bad people in support of the war effort didn't flinch. Most of them would buy Petraeus a beer for showing that he has a sense of humor, which many Generals at his level seem to have had removed from their personalities.

I recognized it immediately as being from that old cartoon that circulated in the 80s. If anything, it just shows that his speechwriters should be more original/creative when coming up with jabs at brother services.
 
I dont think that would be a good idea. The Army would find a way to get the tanks there somehow and then congress would wonder why the AF needs C-17s.
The Army would just contract it out to have some Antonov's fly them over... Oh wait, we're already doing that, with the MRAP's anyway.
 
This is a take off of an old cartoon that floated around before the age of the Internet. The various degrees of suck are posed in sequential cartoon boxes, then it flashes the last box where an UASF pilot in his motel room, with a cold beer, a pre-diem check, and a comment about not having the HBO channel on the TV, "What no HBO, now this really sucks" Back in the 70’s having stayed in USAF BOQ’s deemed inadequate by the USAF that were 100 times better than living on a ship, I found it funny. Doesn't the USAF have a sense of humor?

Yes we do. MOF I was sitting at the Natl Def University when Gen Patreus made the same joke to us as he briefed us...he also made fun of those who work in vs out of the beltline, Army, Navy, etc. Everyone laughed and no one even mentioned it afterwards......one person does not stand for all.

Dave don't start pointing fingers...
 
i say we start pulling out ac-130 missions so when army and marines call for help we wont be there. make fun of the air force then. and start pulling c-17 missions so you dont get your tanks. or start pulling out a-10 missions so those hodgies in front of you keep shooting at your ass....

You know you can save yourself the trouble of making that point, by simply pulling all the USAF tankers out. Done. Point made.
 
This is just ribbing and anyone who is upset by this needs to get a life. This is what the military does. We jab at each other about their respective service, but when it all comes down to the wire....we all do our jobs to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States".
 
This is just ribbing and anyone who is upset by this needs to get a life. This is what the military does. We jab at each other about their respective service, but when it all comes down to the wire....we all do our jobs to "protect and defend the Constitution of the United States".


I am not upset about it at all.

I am just sick of Dave Griffin (the original poster) who:

1. is not a pilot
2. his only claim to fame is being a Navy guy who jumped out of USAF planes
3. constantly claims Navy superiority with statements of hyperbole based on fiction


Rant off
 
Last edited:
I am not upset about it at all.

I am just sick of Dave Griffin (the original poster) who:

1. is not a pilot
2. his only claim to fame is being a Navy guy who jumped out of USAF planes
3. constantly claims Navy superiority with statements of hyperbole based on fiction


Rant off

learhercjay,

So only pilots can criticize the AF? That fits in perfectly with the AF's "air-to-air is the only thing that means sh*t" reputation.

I have great respect for the non-fighter guys in the AF, especially those who support the guys on the ground. They do a superb job day-in and day-out. Combat Talon drivers are great guys, especially when they put their payload on the right DZ.

learhercjay,

So only pilots can criticize the AF? That fits in perfectly with the AF's "air-to-air is the only thing thing that means sh*t" reputation.

I have great respect for the non-fighter guys in the AF, especially those who support the guys on the ground. They do a superb job day-in and day-out. Combat Talon drivers are great guys, especially when they put their payload on the right DZ.

Unfortunately it's still the fighter guys that run the AF and are big time conflicted about the "should we be structured to fight this war or the next war" issue.

If it wasn't for the development of precision guided weapons, your CAS capabilities would really be limited. That alone has kept you in the game and allowed you to use your F-15s and F-16s.

Sec. Gates brought the AF into the current war a year back when he fired your top two guys. That attitude adjustment seemed to work somewhat; you guys are now working on developing 100 el-cheapo, light-fighters for COIN Ops. Way to go; it can't happen fast enough.

But your long standing reputation as pissy, non-team players focused only on air-to-air will be a long time in going away.

And yes, carrier pilots, Navy and Marine, are way better than AF pilots.
 
Last edited:
i say we start pulling out ac-130 missions so when army and marines call for help we wont be there. make fun of the air force then. and start pulling c-17 missions so you dont get your tanks. or start pulling out a-10 missions so those hodgies in front of you keep shooting at your ass....
Aren't most of the A-10s Guard? I think the proper term is Hajii
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hajji
HAHA
PBR
 
How come all these USAF jets are designated "F" when their mission is almost all atttack? Wasn't the F-22 given a new designation of the F/A-22 so it would not looked on as a pure fighter. Kinda following the Navy's lead with the F/A-18?
 
My GOD!!! I cannot believe the whining on this thing! I worked in a joint command for years, did like 30 Red/Green flags, and had Airforce ECMO's in my crew. All great guys! We would rib each other to death and battle at the bar every chance we got. Know one that is worth a s--- would have any issue with any "Joke" from any higher up. I have heard just about Navy bashing joke there is and have given out many, many Airforce bashing comments all in GOOD FUN!!!!!

Let'd get back to reality people.
 
Lets settle this....

once and for all! Who has the better golf courses??? Huh? Huh? :)
 
Yea, but when you have to golf with an ascot it somewhat takes away from the scenery.
 
Dear Dave Griffin,

There was nothing in my posts about AF vs. Navy. My post wasn't about the article at all, I personally thought it was funny. I suppose my post has been building in relation to all of the other crap you spew.

FWIW, I flew heavies (just look at my profile) and had folks from all services jump out of the back of my planes and I have carried folks of all services to many parts of the world, and I have trained Navy pilots how to fly...

You are missing the point of my post - I am all for services getting along. In fact, I highly respect the Navy and other services. We are all on the same team and I like good-natured ribbing.

I believe, in reading your posts over the years that you do not feel the same. Your posts are not good-natured ribbing, you just talk nonsense and you have a chip on your shoulder about the Air Force.

Your reply is laughable, but proves my point. You post about how much the Air Force sucks - not much team playing coming from your mouth is there?

I don't pretend to know everything, but you seem to think you have it all figured out. The AF and the Navy have good pilots, trying to define one as better than the other is always biased opinion based on one's background. While it is fun to poke at each other, I get the impression you just wish the AF would go away. Don't know where that attitude started but it gets old.

Bottomline: your posts make you look bad, if I am reading you wrong than by all means explain it to me, I don't like virtual fights on the web..:(
 
Last edited:
Dear Dave Griffin,

There was nothing in my posts about AF vs. Navy. My post wasn't about the article at all, I personally thought it was funny. I suppose my post has been building in relation to all of the other crap you spew.

FWIW, I flew heavies (just look at my profile) and had folks from all services jump out of the back of my planes and I have carried folks of all services to many parts of the world, and I have trained Navy pilots how to fly...

You are missing the point of my post - I am all for services getting along. In fact, I highly respect the Navy and other services. We are all on the same team and I like good-natured ribbing.

I believe, in reading your posts over the years that you do not feel the same. Your posts are not good-natured ribbing, you just talk nonsense and you have a chip on your shoulder about the Air Force.

Your reply is laughable, but proves my point. You post about how much the Air Force sucks - not much team playing coming from your mouth is there?

I don't pretend to know everything, but you seem to think you have it all figured out. The AF and the Navy have good pilots, trying to define one as better than the other is always biased opinion based on one's background. While it is fun to poke at each other, I get the impression you just wish the AF would go away. Don't know where that attitude started but it gets old.

Bottomline: your posts make you look bad, if I am reading you wrong than by all means explain it to me, I don't like virtual fights on the web..:(

General Petraeus didn't make his joke in a vacuum and Sec Gates didn't fire the top two AF guys on a whim.

They both think the AF doesn't have its heart or head in the current war. I agree with them. For the AF, its a serious cultural issue about teamwork that starts at the very top and needs to be changed.

The Navy vs AF thing is just an added bonus to this discussion. I'm a Navy footabll fan.
 
They both think the AF doesn't have its heart or head in the current war. I agree with them. For the AF, its a serious cultural issue about teamwork that starts at the very top and needs to be changed.
Dave,

I respectfully disagree with you, and your statement about cultural issues in my opinion, is dead wrong. There are many instances where each service is struggling to work more jointly, but these top Generals still struggle with bias from their backgrounds.
Operation Anaconda is a good example. The Army planned everything, kept the AF out of the loop, and then requested air power at the last minute. They blamed the AF for not being team players, but they failed to bring the AF into the "joint planning process." You can't just call up a B-1 and air support at the 11th hour and expect to get it. The 2 star was even criticized for the Army going it alone and the Operation didn't achieve it's goals.
In Kosovo, Gen Clark couldn't wrap his head around Air Power - he had a distinctive Army/ground bias that didn't enable him to fully utilize the Air Force. I saw Strike Eagles take off fully loaded and land fully loaded 6 hours later - Clark couldn't get it right.

Point being, there is a lot of poo slinging at the five pointed building and much of it is based on perception and misunderstanding; and based on each service fighting for dollars from the same pot - this needs to be changed as it breeds tribalism and duplication of effort by each branch. Admittedly, the AF is relatively new to the expeditionary concept and its organic elements are more decentralized than other services. Therefore, controlling those assets requires a bit more coordination.
The services are frustrated at the AF lack of UAV ability, but you cannot ramp up a program like that overnight. Also, getting fired by Gates was needed, but the Secretary is a civilian position - not necessarily a "brass" issue. And if you think the AF is the only one with those issues, feel free to keep burying your head in the sand.
I am starting to sound like a Command Staff College talking paper so I will stop now. No service is perfect and each branch has it's inherent problems, but for some reason you have a thorn in your side with the AF, and being from the Navy - I don't think you have the "big picture" on AF ops the way that you think you do.

Good luck to your Middies, hopefully the Falcons can reverse the trend this year in Maryland.
 
Last edited:
"DaveGriffin" STILL the internet troll that he is. STILL falsely displaying a SEAL trident which he has NEVER earned.

No real SEAL would waste his time with this drivel.

A few years ago I asked him to verify his claim of being a SEAL. He gave the real credentials of someone else who according to his BUDS Class Date, was in his 50's.

Numerous times I have seen "DaveGriffin" claiming that he went to the USNA in the early 90's. Thus he is a FOS poser, and should be treated as such. ZERO creds!
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom