StopNTSing
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2003
- Posts
- 715
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Flyinvixen said:now demand Kobi Bryants (SP i'm sure) deal
So, Vixen, you pretty much ignored my question entirely. So I'll ask it again:
In defiance of almost EVERY, SINGLE, RECENT SLI award, including one with a company that was on the verge of bankruptcy and shutdown within a year or two (a situation AirTran is most certainly NOT in), you really think ALL AirTran Captain seats are forfeit?
Please answer the question, yes you think every AAI CA should lose their seat for you or not?
Vixen,
"Kobi"...... ? Are you referring to the guy who was accused of rape and then decided to buy his wife a very expensive diamond ring ? Give your choice of similes some thought in the future. Karma can be a bitch.
Yes, you spelled his name wrong.
Fletch,
Please don't quote the lunatics posts. It forces us to read it.
I was intimately involved in the RAH, F9, MEA and Lynx SLI. It turned out very poorly for the mainline pilots and everyone has something to gripe about.
The IBT refused to participate in either negotiations or mediation, so we all get to live with the Arbitrator's "award." To the IBT's credit, we were SO far apart it may not have mattered if they participated or not.
If you guys have any chance at all to resolve this outside of arbitration, I would strongly recommend it.
The Arbitrator told us over and over to try to work it out ourselves, stating that whatever we came up with, it would be better than whatever he would eventually decide. He was correct.
Not trying to butt in, just would hate to see any group(s) of pilots go through what we have.
Best of luck to you all.
I think you'll find our Merger Committee will do exactly that.I have to say, I agree...if only for the long term viability of our working relationship...what I hope that the Air Tran guys realize, this company has a value associated with it's culture...preserving that culture is important to me and every SWA guy on property...if we could leave the ego's at the door and negotiate in good faith with each other, in the end we will all be winners...if not, then in the end, to a certain extent, we will all lose...I don't expect the AirTran guys to roll over, but I would hope that they would negotiate from a good faith position that takes into account all they are gaining by becoming members of SWAPA as soon as possible, with all that entails...if so, then our future together is extremely bright...if not, then hold on to your seats, kiddos, it might be a bumpy ride...
I appreciate the honesty, thank you. This discussion, however, is so multi-layered that it's hard to debate on a forum like this, which is why our MEC and MC has asked us not to. I hope you'll forgive us if we defer debate moving forward on this forum and let our MC's do their jobs.for Lear, I will say that arbitral precedent does support retention of CA's seats, one of the things that I expect to be "offered" during negotiations with our NC for a period of time...but there should be a realization that the career expectation of a SWA F/O is greater than the career expectation of an AAI CA...
Those are realistic requests, and I have no issues with our MC's finding some type of middle ground that satisfies those goals. I truly our groups can find such a solution.it's this kind of realistic analysis that I'm talking about when I"m hoping we negotiate in good faith...I want my career to mean what it meant prior to this acquisition or more, and I want your career (AAI guys) to mean what it meant or more...it's really that simple...
No worries, mate, it was a good post. :beer:sorry for the disparate posting style tonight, just doing what I do for texting and because I am entertaing my favorite Russian, Stolichnaya...peace to all my current and future bruthas and sistas...
PapaWoody
....and Vixen, could you also please learn how to quote properly? It ain't that hard!