ex-nutjeter said:You have got to be kidding? FLL not as you put it "economically and envriomentally" cheap? you think that Denver is? you must live in the boonies, For one thing from what I saw in Denver is piss poor house builds at 3 times the cost of a similar house built way better in FL. I use to live in FL, Tampa, and had a 3500 sq. ft house that cost me $300,000, try getting that size of a house in Denver for that cost or even close to that cost , and on top of that, FL has no state income tax unlike Denver, heck, I get charged tax for the privilage of working in DEN and I don't even live there, so, I still think that this guy does not need a reason to live where he wants to, but don't harp on FLL just because you think DEN is soo great, which it is not
Ex-nutjeter,
You missed my point. I don't know anything about Denver, and I'm certainly not defending it. If it's anything like Minneapolis, it's horribly overpriced for what is basically a great hilly, dusty praire that might be convienent to some skiing (which is more than MSP has).
What my point is what FLL is even worse.
In the last few years, SoFL is has gotten WAY, WAY out of line. You want something on the water? You start north of $1 million for a shack only fit for demolition. You want a nice 1800 sq ft 3/2 built in 1961, somewhere other than the swamp, and you are going to pay $500-600k with property tax that will more that eat up any savings that no income tax provides.
Anything newer or with more square footage you can forget about unless you are looking to pay $750k upwards.
BTW, have you been back to Tampa lately to price out some real estate? Chances are you couldn't buy back your old house.
BTW, I'm a native of SoFL, so I can say whatever I want about it. I've earned that right.
Nu