DOVPILOT
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2004
- Posts
- 393
Frontier files Ch. 11... (CNN.com)
FrontierAirlines.com Statement...
Here's to hoping they can pull through this one...
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Frontier files Ch. 11... (CNN.com)
FrontierAirlines.com Statement...
Here's to hoping they can pull through this one...
What does a 170 typically burn at 350 at .76?
Jet A
Jet A
luvz2fli.. sorry if I jumped down your throat a little.. I agree with what your saying in general. It is absolute crap that all 121 planes are not treated the same and paid by size. No doubt about it. However tprops have always been deemed inferior, by pilots, by the public, and by the companies.
I've worked for 2 all prop operators and I get tired of being deemed a sellout because I fly a big plane for less. I made my decision on where to work based on a wide array of issues.
For my part I have and will continue to fight nail and tooth at my company to get appropriate rates for the size of the plane, thats my contribution.
The smaller jet comment was just to point out that no operator treats props farily including horizon.. I wholeheartedly agree money is what matters.
I don't have SJS or big airplane hardon (BAH) I've long said that if I could make $200K a year and be home 23 nights a month flying a Skyhawk.. well then sign me up..
I don't think the difference is that big...not sure, but believe it's less than 5%? Since the 700 is at least 5% faster, paying a little less on the Q seems about right?!
THATS the problem right there! A long while ago, when aviation was first starting, pilots were paid by speed of the aircraft. However, as aircraft became faster that needed to change, and thats why we are paid by capacity now. Problem is, people still look at a turboprop and say, "well, its just a prop plane" and somehow use that as justification to pay less than a comparable jet, EVEN IF HAS THE SAME CAPACITY! Especially now that the Q goes significantly faster than any regional prop before it and almost as fast as a jet. Just my .02 cents.
Actually, I am pretty sure the guys at horizon get paid what their seniority will hold, not what they actually fly.
This is true for FOs, but not for CAs.
CAs are paid for what they fly.
QX 18 year CA payscale on the CRJ 700 is $120.52/hour versus $110.88/hour for the Q400.