Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Freedom's Baaaaack!

  • Thread starter Thread starter T-Gates
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 14

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
CitationLover said:
crossky,

since you are a legal expert, please explain "fighting freedom in the courts"? the union recommended the contract because it significantly RAISED their rates (ie the senior leadership). we have a weak union whose slogan is "go ahead do it and grieve it", however such, your condescending attitude shows you to be a blowhard. there are mvmts to remove the current leadership and all we can do is hope.

jo needs freedom to stay afloat. the faa was warned about this "bargaining" certificate and he must show it to not be one. we have the power here, but alas too many want to goto PHX for a ready reserve slot. SAD. he also wants 250hr san juaners in the rt seat of a 737. he is crazy.

QUOTE]

Stop it, I never said that, You're putting words in my mouth. But since you asked, here's it in plain language: Mesa ALPA should have requested and put pressure on ALPA national to put their attorneys (your and our attorneys) to work by filing a multi-million dollar lawsuit against JO and Mesa for railway labor act violations. God know there are enough lawyers available.

Additional things which should have been done:
1. Every pilot file a grievance for violation of the contract by starting an illiegal non-union alter ego carrier - a classic union busting effort by JO. Your old contract did have a non-union / alter ego clause, didn't it?
2. Mesa ALPA and ALPA national should've started a regional and national PR campaign.

Even you admit yourself that Mesa has enough pilot whores ready to fly a freedom PHX 1900 or 737. Justifies the outcome that your pilot group voted yes to an industry lowering contract in exchange for JO to promise to stop Freedom (until now at least). Mesa ALPA and National ALPA should've worked together to stop Freedom through lawsuits and court proceedings.
 
this is the kind of ignorance that I was talking about..

Mesa Airlines had scope protection under the previous contract. That is why management created Mesa Air Group - the holding company which then controlled Mesa Airlines and soon purchased CCAir (let the whipsawing begin). There was no Mesa Air Group at the signing of the previous contract and therefore no language preventing Mesa Air Group from starting Freedumb Airlines.

Lawsuits were filed. I don't remember the exact nature of these, but I believe Mesa ALPA tried to make the case that the intent of the previous contract was scope protection, which should apply even though the company structure has changed. The lawsuits were not a sure thing by any stretch of the imagination.

Also, lawsuits take time. Meanwhile Freedumb was taking delivery of all Mesa Air Group's new jets (except maybe some ERJs on the East Coast - don't remember), and would have continued to grow rapidly...or so it was thought. Freedumb would grow and Mesa would die a slow and certain death. Mesa has done it before...they just as easily would have done it again. Remember what happened to West Air? What's that? You say you don't remember a West Air? You should try to get the scoop on that.:rolleyes: They pretty much did it to CCAir as well. Although with this contract we were able to save some of the CCAir guys jobs.

ALPA national was very interested and involved. These tactics reminded them of Lorenzo and they did not want JO to succeed with Freedumb. Not sure the lengths to which ALPA national went though.

Why didn't we just strike? Well, you don't just decide you want to strike and then do it. You have to be given permission to strike. (You also have to remember the state of the economy and airline industry and keep that in context.) The thought was that negotiations might drag on for years. That is what happened at West Air, and I believe the CCAir contract talks lasted quite some time also, and mangagement was slowly but surely killing CCAir. For those of us based in PHX we could see that the America West pilots contract talks lasted several years. The thought of having the talks drag on and on...and seeing Freedumb growing while Mesa shrinks...CCAir would have been long gone...the situation did not appear to be very pleasant.

Heard enough? I am sick of telling the story. But, as I said there is so much ignorance out there and people are too quick to judge. Guys that work at companies like SkyWest ,Horizon and others don't know the situation here. Their managements get it. Their managements know how to treat employees well and run a great airline. Mesa Air Group doesn't give a rats a$$. They just don't care. As long as the code-share partners are happy and they can add to their Harley Davidson collection, they are satisfied.

As for the Freedumb certificate - one BE-1900 will be placed on the certificate within a week or two. JO probably wants to keep this certificate alive as part of a contigency plan should US Airways go under. I was surprised to hear about the ad for new hires for this Freedumb 1900. Regardless of who flys this aircraft, the pilots will all be from or placed on the Mesa seniority list.
 
re: Mesa's "weak union"

I keep hearing this over and over about Mesa's "weak union".

CitationLover - I would not say that we have a "weak union". From what I understand this is the way all labor contracts work. A contract is signed (hopefully the intent of each section is clearly spelled out), and each party has their own interpretation of the meaning of the contract. If labor does not like management's interpretation then labor has the right to file a grievance. That is the process. It is not Mesa ALPA's weakness.

What else do you want them to do? Should we call for a sick-out? American Airlines pilots did that and American Airlines won a lawsuit costing the APA millions of dollars in damages (actually, it ended up being used as a concession in their next contract - I think).
I think it was a few years ago that Northwest Airlines was successful in getting search warrants to look at employees computers to see if they conspired to start an illegal work action (isn't that what it's called?).

The process is just made more difficult and frustrating by a management which seems to enjoy dragging out the greivance process. They seem to enjoy the confrontation. As I have said in my previous post - unless you have worked here, you just do not understand the adversarial atmosphere created by management.

I was sitting at KBIL - Billings, Montana the other day and looking at a beautiful Horizon Q400 and just wondering what it would be like to work for a comany that gets it. Those guys (the management) get it. Our management does not. THAT is the difference.
 
Just to clear things up, Freedom will be run by ALPA MAG pilots. the only way they can hire off the street, is by first running a standing bid for anyone who wants to bid 1900 PHX FO/CA, and then running a new hire class to fill the additional slots, or they can Junior Assign current excess to PHX. Either way, this Freedom will be a union shop with a bad reputation...

There is a grievance currently filed regarding the way they are advertising the positions.
 
you guys are real quick to bash mesa, so why dont you tell us who you guys work for so we all know what a perfect airline or 135 op you work for. im sure your airline has never had any sort of problems with management.
 
SpacemanSpiff said:
I keep hearing this over and over about Mesa's "weak union".

CitationLover - I would not say that we have a "weak union". From what I understand this is the way all labor contracts work. A contract is signed (hopefully the intent of each section is clearly spelled out), and each party has their own interpretation of the meaning of the contract. If labor does not like management's interpretation then labor has the right to file a grievance. That is the process. It is not Mesa ALPA's weakness.

What else do you want them to do? Should we call for a sick-out? American Airlines pilots did that and American Airlines won a lawsuit costing the APA millions of dollars in damages (actually, it ended up being used as a concession in their next contract - I think).
I think it was a few years ago that Northwest Airlines was successful in getting search warrants to look at employees computers to see if they conspired to start an illegal work action (isn't that what it's called?).

The process is just made more difficult and frustrating by a management which seems to enjoy dragging out the greivance process. They seem to enjoy the confrontation. As I have said in my previous post - unless you have worked here, you just do not understand the adversarial atmosphere created by management.

I was sitting at KBIL - Billings, Montana the other day and looking at a beautiful Horizon Q400 and just wondering what it would be like to work for a comany that gets it. Those guys (the management) get it. Our management does not. THAT is the difference.
Perhaps if you were to develop a spine there would less of a Mesa Bash Fest in progress. Wasn't the Jets4Jobs at USAirways engineered in part by your MEC and not Mesa management?
 
that's a good question...

We think our spines are just fine, thanks. Thanks for "caring". It's nice to see such concern from an experienced professional as yourself. Makes me feel all warm inside. Oh, I forgot tingly...warm and tingly inside.:rolleyes:


I don't remember if Jets4Jobs was Mesa ALPAs or management's idea. I thought it was USAirways union and/or USAirways management's idea. Then presented to our management and the union leadership was convinced to go along. Please, correct me if I am wrong. (I tried to look this up on the Mesa ALPA web-site, but it seems that ALPA's web-site is in the middle of an upgrade of some sort.)

In my opinion there was nothing wrong with Jets4Jobs. We grew and added more flying opportunities for Mesa pilots as well as brought on board some USAirways guys in need of a job. If we did not agree to it the flying would have gone to some other company. Sounds like a win-win situation to me. Perfect situation - no, but an example of spineless-ness, hardly.

This past year, JO offered to let us have the "privilege" of flying 737's for our 900 rates + 20%. That was just for captains. FOs would make some ungodly and ridiculously low rate - can't remember. I was proud that our guys and our union said "no thanks" or "shove it" to the offer. We are more interested in Mesa honoring the current contract first, and then when that time comes we will be glad to sit down and officially negotiate 737 pay rates. So we are not spineless, and we are not you. We are not ComAir, Horizon, SkyWest, etc. We have a different history, a different set of circumstances, a different attitude from our management and for you to call us spineless just shows your ignorance.
 
Why didn't we just strike? Well said:
Well, well, can you hear me playing my thumb and finger violin of sympathy? Actually thanks for the information, I know a few more facts about your situation.

I would like to split the details with you, but it's not worth my time right now. Thanks, but I don't need the lecture on when and why you can strike. I'm not that ignorant, but I didn't previously do a study on the latest infamous history of MESA. It's easy to hear it from others and go from there, I hope you can understand. IMO you're still the black sheep of the family.

I've seen the white and purple Dash 8 as UAX in DEN for over a year now. Everyone has seen the white CRJ's. I heard Mesa showed up once at DEN as Frontier Jet Express in a Am West express paint job. Get enough airplanes to cover all your carriers please. I've seen you taxi at ORD, clueless. I heard that Mesa rejected a takeoff clearance in position after a ground delay at Dulles because the crew realized only one engine was turning. I heard Mesa has lots of pilots timing out again this Nov, this happens every year doesn't it?

I do admit I have some bias, being a pilot for Air Wisconsin. But Mesa still sucks.
 
SpacemanSpiff said:
This past year, JO offered to let us have the "privilege" of flying 737's for our 900 rates + 20%. That was just for captains. FOs would make some ungodly and ridiculously low rate - can't remember. I was proud that our guys and our union said "no thanks" or "shove it" to the offer. We are more interested in Mesa honoring the current contract first, and then when that time comes we will be glad to sit down and officially negotiate 737 pay rates.
And do you really think that you'd have turned down 737 flying at RJ rates if people didn't give you guys so much sh!t about the original Freedom debacle? I think that if nobody had given you sh!t the first time, you'd have taken those 73's without even flinching. Peer pressure isn't always a bad thing.
 
DirkkDiggler said:
And do you really think that you'd have turned down 737 flying at RJ rates if people didn't give you guys so much sh!t about the original Freedom debacle? I think that if nobody had given you sh!t the first time, you'd have taken those 73's without even flinching. Peer pressure isn't always a bad thing.

now you're taking credit for OUR actions? you really are a DirK.

crossky, what the f@#$ do you want from mesa? i hope one day JO buys air wisonsin so you can feel the sh!t stain up close. its easy to throw stones from high places.

cardinals in '04
 
A lil side note... as of this week N906FJ is the only remaining Freedom aircraft. Based on what I heard, the plane will be reconfigured in the coming weeks to an 86 seat config, so I would imagine the B1900 Freedom thing would happen fairly soon after that. I wonder if they will put 1 first class seat in the F8 Beech? :P
 
i dont think we would have taken the 737's at the rates the company was offering no matter what. you guys that dont work in the he!! hole called mesa have no idea what we go through on a daily basis. even if the company offered industry average i dont think we would have done just because of the way we are treated.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of spine....

Did Comair give you one when you PFT'D? Or did you have to go somewhere else to buy one? Or perhaps a loner? BTW You don't seem to have much problem flying former Delta Mainliner routes in you RJ's. Pft plus Replacement Jet equals pious pontificator of the airline industry???? NOT!!! RJ's have put more mainline pilots out of a job than Mesa, JO or 9-11......Dufus......
 
CitationLover said:
crossky, what the f@#$ do you want from mesa? i hope one day JO buys air wisonsin so you can feel the sh!t stain up close. its easy to throw stones from high places.

cardinals in '04
I want what other pilots at our company want, our flying back, and a stop to the lowering of our standards of living. But I don't live in Denver, you should talk to some of our pilots who do, they're not as nice as I am.

I'd like to blame SkyWest for our loss of the Denver CRJ Dom. too, but their management seems to care about them a little bit, their planes are clean, their pilots never time out, and their FA's are attractive.

Tell JO to come on up to Appleton, but to bring a coat. It's fall, starting to get chilly, he might get the cold shoulder from our privately held company management.

My CRJ seat sits no higher than yours buddy. I left Great Lakes in 2002, where they then and still now make $3 less per hour than you in the 1900. You know it's bad when you work at a company where if Mesa bought you that would be a good thing.

Truce. It's not worth my whining anymore.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom