rickair7777
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 28, 2006
- Posts
- 901
So, was the Freedom certificate a good deal or not?
I laugh when I read crap like this......the biggest B^%$ers about Freedom would have been furloughed when Mesa lost their U flying because there was no place to put the jets. It is OK to do an end run around the DAL scope when it saves your bacon, but when it was to do an end run around the USAir scope, it was an alter-ego, scumbag operation.
It would be funny if it weren't so sad.
A350
Disclaimers:
-I do not work for mesa/freedom.
-I think they are mostly weak sisters for cheerfully putting up with what JO dishes out.
-Based on my previous experience, I would assume that mesa/freedom's performance is the worst in the industry, and any "statistics" to the contrary are falsified by management.
With that said A350, you are extremely misinformed about regional dynamics...
Freedom A was an alter-ego because it was designed to circumvent mesa's own contract and seniority...basically it was mesa pilots stealing from other mesa pilots.
Freedom B was used for DAL flying PRIOR TO DAL BANKRUPTCY. At that time DAL had scope language that said no DCI regional could operate 900's. When Freedom signed up with DAL it was to operate 50-seat RJ's...there was not a contract or an intent at the time to operate 900's for DAL. The 900 scope was only an issue because Mesa operated 900's for Airways...this had nothing to do with DAL, but the fact that mesa owned them was technically a violation of scope language. So the Freedom B certificate was used to satisfy that technicality.
The DCI 900's came after DAL scope was loosened in BK...not a good thing but it had nothing to do with the Freedom B pilots. The first DAL 900's were flown by other regionals, not Freedom B.
I'm all about mesa-bashing, but let's keep it factual so we don't lose the high ground. There's more than enough to be said about mesa as it is...inventing our own fantasy version of reality is best left to Ornstool and Co.
Last edited: