120% Torque
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2002
- Posts
- 277
That's where we disagree. I think this training dept is one of the best! How many thousands of pilots has it trained in the last 8 years? 2000 or more? Yet because we are not ALPA it is somehow flawed? People bust upgrade/traing events for a number of reasons. I'm sure you know most of the same stories I do. I am a pilot as are you. But not all pilots are meant to be regional pilots. Getting hired at an airline should not be a jobs program. If ALPA wants someone to get more IOE than 50 hours its the pilots fault, not the companies. Sure if SGU hired the "wrong" person but remember these guys are COMMERCIALLY rated pilots that have passed the sim/AC checkout to get to IOE. Sometimes a person just doesn't have it in them. Maybe if the FAA adopts that new "crew only" certificate we'll be forced to do "extra" training as part of the normal training event.
And just because you failed somewhere along the way, it is not the end of a pilots career. That's standard ALPA Fear tactic #221, without us to save you, you are done! I think most of use can be objective enough to know who should be a captain and who should not. Remember Ms Glideslope? Or Paula? Or the upgradeguy who wanted to call SLC center and/or the FSS to have them turn on the runway lights in PIH?
I have one funny story about your "bad guy" Mr. Taylor. He was doing the type rides to two new EMB captains in SLC. When it came time to taxi out, the first guy became confused as to the taxi route. When told to simply look at his 10-9 chart. That's when he admitted his Jepps were back with his partner in row 9. Taylor had him stop the plane, retrieve is stuff, and then continue. And yes he passed.
There is always room for improvement in any department. Do we need ALPA to "fix" this one? We'll know in mid-Nov.
Fly Safe.
We are not talking about the same pilots. The ones I am talking about were known to be excellent pilots and had a strong track record prior to the time they ran into Taylor for example and were terminated. Taylor is a jeckle and hide. Dont take a checkride with him right after he has a shouting match with one of his ex wives. He is an individual that has a hard time separating his personal and professional self much to many pilots detriment. He has been know to be a major hot head and gets in peoples faces. He never should have been in the training dept and certainly should have been removed after his his failure rate for pilots/captain candidates and the many complaints filed on him. Instead, the company looked the other way. Careers were damaged or ruined for no good reason.
Regarding the training dept all that is being said is that if you hire a pilot based upon criteria established by your company but there was a higher than average failure rate than similar operations then you need to look at the training dept and what needs to be fixed. The fact once again is that skywest is hiring low time pilots, they have less experience and most have never flown anything bigger than a cessna. This is different from when I was hired and the average new hire had over 2000 hours. My first sim partner had 5000 tt and 1000 lear time. Skywest is hiring low time pilots because that is all they can attract. IF they hire someone and that person is motivated to try and has a good attitude but is later failed mainly owing to his lack of experience then that is wrong. The burden once again falls on skywest hiring dept and training dept. I'm not talking about United style, hold your hand till you pass but if a new guy needs 50 hours to gain experience he has never had and skywest hired him knowing he was on the extreme low end in experience then so be it.
Now, back to the original arguement, pilots being fired, who are good pilots that are not liked by the company due to their views on things such as a union. Or the good pilot that heaven forbid is tired and makes a mistake. Have you ever made a mistake. NEVER? These guys deserve a fair representation with due process. If you read the first page of this thread you will know what skywest management says about pilot representation via their lapdog representative group called Sapa:
Issue: Pilots desire for a defendant for review board.
Outcome:“Management will not be able to accommodate due to legal constraints.”
This isnt just about Alpa or not Alpa, its about getting something real in place to protect a good pilots career should something go wrong.
Last edited: