Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Fliers Trapped On Tarmac Have Little Recourse

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

chperplt

Registered User
Joined
Nov 25, 2001
Posts
4,123
This article is about Independence Air, but could very easily be about any airline. When would you go back to the gate? Without an APU, at what cabin temp warrants a return to gate?

We all bitch about the passenger that wants everything for nothing, but this is kind of ridiculous.





Fliers Trapped On Tarmac Have Little Recourse

By Keith L. Alexander
Tuesday, July 13, 2004; Page E01

After sitting on the tarmac for five hours waiting to take off, the passengers on Independence Air Flight 1128 felt anything but independent.

The flight was supposed to take off from Boston's Logan International Airport at 1:15 p.m. Wednesday. But because of yet another harsh stream of thunderstorms blowing into the Washington area, Dulles International Airport was not accepting incoming flights.

So the passengers sat on the 50-seat plane on the tarmac with little air conditioning for nearly four hours. The aircraft finally returned to the gate at 5 p.m. Twenty-five minutes later, passengers were ordered to quickly get back on board. The plane made its way down the runway, only to sit again, for another hour.

The plane finally took off from Boston at 6:40 p.m. and arrived at Dulles at 8:50, nearly eight hours after scheduled departure. It was just about the same amount of time it would have taken the passengers to drive.

"We felt a little captive on there and people were getting angrier and angrier each moment," said passenger Maryanne Hellender of Potomac. "If we had been on there any longer, it would have been mutiny on Independence Airlines."

This sort of captivity was supposed to end after a couple of incidents several years ago -- in which Northwest Airlines and United Airlines trapped passengers on grounded planes for eight hours -- prompted all of the major airlines, under threat of legislation from Congress, to adopt so-called passenger bills of rights. Those rules spelled out how they would inform customers of delayed or canceled flights and how they would treat them during "extended" waits for departure.

In his 2001 report to Congress on airline customer service, Department of Transportation inspector general Kenneth Mead said the airlines should clarify what they meant by an "extended" period so that "passengers will know what they can expect."

"Airlines differ in what qualifies as 'extended,' " Mead said at the time. "The trigger thresholds for this provision vary from 45 minutes to three hours. We think it is unlikely that a passenger's definition of an 'extended' on-aircraft delay will vary depending upon which air carrier they are flying."

Just three months after Mead's testimony, the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks occurred, forcing the airlines to focus on other issues and leaving those vagaries undefined.

But Independence passenger Hellender said that the airlines should be forced to revisit the issue.

"There should be a federal law or ruling on how long people can be kept on the airline," Hellender said.

Aaron Kahn, a passenger on the Independence Air flight, immediately contacted Biz Class after arriving at his Lovettsville, Va., home following the ordeal.

"We kept getting misleading information. They kept saying after an hour we'll make a decision about going back, but after the hour was up, the captain would come on and say we're going to wait another hour and see what happens," Kahn said.

The sole flight attendant on the plane passed out drinks and pretzels to the passengers during the wait. And the passengers were allowed to use their cell phones. But what these travelers wanted was the option to get off the plane and either try to find an alternate flight or just go to a hotel for the evening and try again the next day.

It turns out that Flight 1128 would have been the first flight cleared to take off from Boston once the ground hold by air traffic control was lifted, and the captain did not want to risk losing that position by returning to the gate.

Rick DeLisi, a spokesman for Dulles-based Independence Air, said the airline's procedures called for the crew to take a vote of the passengers to see if the majority wanted to wait it out on the tarmac or instead return to the gate. But it turns out the vote was not taken. Instead, the crew tried to wait out the ground stop so they could take off, but the air traffic controllers kept extending the delay.

"This situation was totally unacceptable to us. We have immediately changed our own policies to ensure this kind of thing never occurs again," DeLisi said.

Independence has implemented a rule that if a flight is on the tarmac for up to two hours, it must return to the gate.

A survey of other airlines found that few have a time limit during such incidents. Northwest was the only major carrier that had a time limit on taxi-out delays. After three hours on the tarmac, a Northwest flight must return to the gate, said Northwest spokeswoman Mary Stanik.

Other carriers have very loose guidelines. US Airways and Delta decide what to do in these incidents on a case-by-case basis and have no time limits. United determines how long a flight stays on a tarmac by polling its passengers.

As an apology to the 20 or so passengers on the delayed Logan-Dulles flight, Independence offered each of them a credit of $525 -- the equivalent of four or five flights -- for future travel on the airline.

"There's nothing about this story that makes us happy in any way. We will make sure that nothing like this could ever happen like this again," DeLisi said.

Question of the Week: If you take your kids on business trips with you, what advice would you give to people thinking about whether to try it? Please send your name and daytime phone number to [email protected].
 
chperplt said:
Question of the Week: If you take your kids on business trips with you, what advice would you give to people thinking about whether to try it? Please send your name and daytime phone number to [email="[email protected]."][email protected].[/email]
Kids on business trips? Err'uph How about a Saratoga with a inflight entertainment system.
 
Situations like that described in the article are driven by a lack of information to the flight crew. This takes the form of nothing, or "guesses" from ATC ( I think that locally they're as much in the dark as the flight crews at times ), or info from your own dispatch center that, "they're going to lift departure restrictions any minute not so hang in there" ( after the first hour or so, this gets to be real cr@p ). These folks mean well, but don't have their knees under their chins with low airflow and no food/water.


However, there comes a point where the captain needs to get up on his hind legs...BE THE CAPTAIN... and say, "...enough of this **&^%$$ is enough...". You are absolutely torturing pax by keeping them onboard under oppressive condiitons ( no food/water, johns full, low airflow, lack of space to move about, etc. ). You "might" lose your slot ? Well, after a couple of hours, SO WHAT ????; you're do late now, what does it matter ?? Put pax well-being ahead of everything else and take them back to the gate and regroup.

Each situation is different and my reaction was based on a small degree of "science" and a lot of gut feel for how the whole thing was shaping up ( been there...done this too many times has some real value...the whole thing will get a "smell" to it that will tell you what to do ). So, my tolerance was limited to about one hour +/- ( did I exceed this ? You bet I did and it's a great story ). I NEVER had anyone complain about going back to the gate and, in fact, got comments indicating relief at being able to get off that friggin' airplane...get some air...get some food...move around...make some calls home...etc.

After 35 years of airline flying, the one thing I learned is that pax mightily, and rightly, resent even the perception that their well-being is not foremost in YOUR decisions. They will accept a lot of delay if you tell them "the truth and nothing but the truth..."

Put yourself in one of those torture racks that pass for cabin seats and ask how many hours YOU are willing to sit there. That should give you all the impetus you need to go back to the gate.
 
How about a three hour flight on an RJ? Isn't that torture also? Oh yeah, someone will next say that three hours in the middle seat of a 757 is also torture, except that you can get up and walk around, get your stuff from the overhead bin, and have a choice of directions in going to the bathroom. (front or back)


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
General Lee said:
How about a three hour flight on an RJ? Isn't that torture also? Oh yeah, someone will next say that three hours in the middle seat of a 757 is also torture, except that you can get up and walk around, get your stuff from the overhead bin, and have a choice of directions in going to the bathroom. (front or back)


General,

When did this turn into a bash-the-RJ thread? This is about captain sh*t, pure and simple. There are plenty of other bash-the-RJ threads on which you can spew.


Bye-bye
 
The most miserable I've ever been as a passenger was on a 14 hour transoceanic flight on a 744 sitting at the bulkhead (ATL-JNB). Didn't sleep a wink. Plus I had to wake up the guy in the isle every time I wanted "walk around and get my stuff from the overhead bin". Bigger isn't always better. Business class rocks, but doesn't happen much anymore.:rolleyes:
 
Touche! I thought it was funny though..... Come on, they were talking about Torture---and it was a perfect fit. You would think that the Captain on that RJ would have felt it in his a$$ region sitting for 5 hours too? Yeah, that Capt should have done something sooner.....relax Bayou, relax! (you can do it!)


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
The Cpt should have stepped up to the plate and gone back to the gate. Completion factor is not the name of the game.

Passengers will respect you and your airline more if you do the human thing and think of them first.
 
General Lee said:
Yeah, that Capt should have done something sooner.

Yeah, he should of. But I'd like to hear the conversation between him and his dispatch. I'm highly suspicious of that Indy Air rep who hung the crew out to dry in that article.


General Lee said:
.....relax Bayou, relax!

Oh, I can relax General. I got a loving wife, a good dog, a house that's mine, no credit card debt, no alimony and a six pack of PBR in the fridge. But, I'm 6-4 and 200 pounds. There ain't much difference (to me) comfortwise between an MD80 and an ERJ, and I'll take any ERJ seat over a middle-row seat in the MD80 any day.

Cheers!
 
I always thought those pax stuck in DTW back in that big snowstorm should have gotten a class-action suit against NWA.

Inexcusable.

However, it wil take public pressure to make real changes
 
I agree with Chprplt.

Unfortunately some Captains are more worried about doing a carpet-dance for going back to the gate than they are about stepping up to the plate and doing the right thing.

That being said, we're all being Monday morning quarterbacks.

That crew could've been stuck on a taxiway between a bunch of other airplanes with no way to get back to the gate if they WANTED to.

If that was the case the passengers could have revolted, taken off their clothes and did the chicken dance in protest! It would'nt have gotten them back to the gate any faster.

Sometimes you're just stuck between a rock and a hard-place.
(unless you want to call a bus out to pick the folks up on the taxiway)
 
Where was the dispatcher????

If I were the dispatcher for this flight, after it was evident that the Wx delays were going to be extensive, I would have called the BOS Tower and requested that the aircraft be allowed to do a gate return, worked it our with them, found a gate to off load the Pax before calling the crew with the plan..

As it is the PIC and the dispatchers responsibility to oversee the best interest of the flight, and airline which includes the PAX comfort and well being. I am afraid I would have had to insist that the Captain return to the gate I had worked out....if the PIC refused, I would have gone so far as to cancelled the release, i.e. the flight plan.....either way those pax would have been comfortable in the terminal...

This is smart for business, smart for the airline...I dont understand what this crew was thinking about, true I was not there, but they are on the ground and ATC is there to serve, getting stuck in the middle of a log jam is no excuse, that would mean that other airlines suffered the same delays, I have not heard or seen anything for other airlines stuck in line at BOS...

This brings up some other concerns...Does Indy have ACARS to get a new release? If not how did they get one, with new weather? Also what about the Taxi fuel used....even on one engine, did they have enough to complete the flight plan intended, with Alternates and reserves????

Finally many people are able to fly under normal conditions, but canning them up for 5 hours on the gound, hot, cramped etc, can certainly cause some pretty serious medical and mental conditions to flair up.....

A full compnay investigation of the Flt Crew, DISPATCHER, and supervisors is warranted IMHO.....
 
FurloughedAgain is right, we're all second-guessing here. But it's happened enough times already. Aren't there a few brave souls here who will defend this captain's decision?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom