Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

FLASH, This just in,...NWA and DAL pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Someone else put this together for me.

As the press reported, NWA wants to restructure the deal without pilot participation. DAL would be forced by their fiduciary responsibilities to look at the proposal. These facts could be very easily misinterpreted by NWA pilot leasership.
 
Why is it that a large group of the DAL posters on hear come across as Armchair CEO's? Do some of you actually think you have control over what happens in the board meetings with the CEO's? Now back to your regularly scheduled flame fest.:p
Another part of Delta's unique culture... much of their senior leadership are pilots. True more often in the past than now, but the tradition remains and management keeps a very open door with the pilot group.

It has a positive effect for both management and pilots IMHO.

and don't forget, you are here also....
 
Someone else put this together for me.

As the press reported, NWA wants to restructure the deal without pilot participation. DAL would be forced by their fiduciary responsibilities to look at the proposal. These facts could be very easily misinterpreted by NWA pilot leasership.

You are making the assumption that it is NWA management re-initiating an otherwise dead deal instead of the well orchestrated PR of what is already a predetermined course of action.

We know NWA management are "bad guys". We know that RA has managed to foster a level of trust with his new employees. To about face and jam it to them and say "take it or leave it" would destroy that good faith.

What better ploy than to blame it on the bad guys and the BOD. Sorry boys, I had no choice (ditto Moak).

I'm beginning to believe with the apparent momentum and financial forces behind it, this thing was going to go through one way or another, and now that we didn't bite at the carrot we are going to get beaten senseless with the stick.
 
Last edited:
We know NWA management are "bad guys". We know that RA has managed to foster a level of trust with his new employees. To about face and jam it to them and say "take it or leave it" would destroy that good faith.

What better ploy than to blame it on the bad guys and the BOD. Sorry boys, I had no choice (ditto Moak).

I'm beginning to believe with the apparent momentum and financial forces behind it, this thing was going to go through one way or another, and now that we didn't bite at the carrot we are going to get beaten senseless with the stick.
Agree....RA always tries to be the good guy...make DS the bad, again.
 
You are making the assumption that it is NWA management re-initiating an otherwise dead deal instead of the well orchestrated PR of what is already a predetermined course of action.
No this is not pre-planned PR.

If the merger happens despite the pilots' objections and with blame placed for the failure to secure $2 Billion dollars worth of pay and benefits there will never be peace between the pilot groups.

Jeesh, I need to get off this board and update my resume.
 
The airline's No. 2 executive, Ed Bastian, had been scheduled to make the trip but canceled amid talk that merger discussions with Northwest Airlines may be re-heating. Similarly, Delta chief executive Richard Anderson canceled plans to be on a new flight to London's Heathrow Airport, also being inaugurated Sunday.




This is a quote from the Atlanta journal constitution regarding the new non-stop service between Atlanta and China. It looks like the Delta executives are serious about this merger with Northwest seeing that the CEO and president cancelled their trips with the Governor and business delegates from Atlanta. This merger may be imminent. April 2008 will be very interesting.
 
We were, and are, told that the option has been removed by other events. We were also told this was not a negotiation, this was a deal.

The separation of fact from public posturing to force movement by the other side is an difficult process. That's why I've always advocated watching their feet.

I'm not calling you a liar, but somebody somewhere is completely failing to manage expectations and that could very well be a fatal political mistake.

The legitimacy of your (or my) expectations depends on how close to the topic we are when me make them. The farther you step back to observe the industry - and our place within it - the more pragmatic you become. Show me a pilot with a "normal" career path who realized all of his expectations...and you'll see he was the exception rather than the rule.

The people that will make the ultimate decision on this merger are the amoral cannibals at Wayzata, Cargill, Pardus, Blackstone, and Owl Creek...along with our SkyTeam cousins at AF/KLM. Anderson will have a say, but he doesn't hold a majority of the shares (and proxies) those vultures do.

I'll admit the Delta BOD could over ride Delta's leadership, but ALPA's got a person on the board and of course Anderson is there. My point is if what you write is true, many people have painted themselves in a corner and the political fall out would be nasty for not only for the Delta Reps, but also senior management.

1. "Could" override? He is THEIR tool...not vice versa. If it happens it will be their decision, and Richard will do what they say.

2. Your BOD seat is non-voting. That's an F/A giving you advice on how to land in a crosswind from behind the door.

3. Public statements have a purpose. Your Merger Team has done a little negotiating in the press with them to elicit a reaction from us. We've done the same, essentially. The management statements have been made to prevent panic and/or a log-jam by middle managers at the good resume printer.

I genuinely disagree with you about the merger's inevitability. I'm not saying you are wrong, but I simply do not see how it can be forced by the minority who's management will not be the leadership in the combined entity.

A little Googling is in order then. Count the voting shares held by investors who aren't interested in building or running an airline. They are NOT the "minority". Add a party-of-interest (AF/KLM) with a desire to solidify their future and a checkbook full of euros, and you have the perfect set-up for this.

The displaced managers will be compensated, and will hook up with other airlines.

Perhaps you are right and I am a fool for believing the press, my reps, and management who are held accountable, over nameless web board rumor.

Nah...all you gotta do is review which source has been more accurate to-date.
 
The management statements have been made to prevent panic and/or a log-jam by middle managers at the good resume printer.

Heyas Occam,

I've been trying to use that printer, but all it does is sit there and say "PC LOAD LETTER". What the fcuk does that mean?

Nu
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom