~~~^~~~
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2001
- Posts
- 6,137
Flightjock - As with so many jobs, it depends on who you know. Capt. Prouse not only got a job back, he retained his seniority and Capt. status. I suspect that Capt. Prouse is (1) a good guy (2) an average, or better, pilot and (3) has kissed the Blarney Stone. What bothers me the most about his situation is that it was no "accident." He was aware of his impairment and the imparment of his crew, yet decided to fly anyway. His action was a decision to break the rules when he knew better.
A2 and Simon - the most recent study I have read was by Dr. William Dement of Stanford University. His study was quoted extensively in Air Line Pilot magazine's March 2003 publication. To quote, "fatigue has a lot in common with hypoxia and and the effects of alcohol in that a person is generally not aware of its onset. People commonly underestimate the effect alcohol is having on them when they have had a few drinks. Similarly, in NASA's tests, in which pilots rated the effect of fatigue on their performance, they consistently underate it."
Interestingly, the military hands out "go pills" and "no go pills" to pilots. These pills are amphetamines and tranquilizers and that would be considered disqualifying "drug use" for us civillian pilots.
Darn near a jet - ALPA has done a lot with fatigue issues - (including promotion of Dr. Phil's career - did you know ALPA was one of his first clients as an "expert witness?") Our employers, or rather crew schedulers, could simply care less how fatigued the crews are. Their job is to staff an airplane going from point A to point B, period. Our airline allows pilots to be worked a sixteen hour duty day, followed by nine hours off duty (to get home, shower and sleep) in preparation for another 16 hour day. This can go on for 6 days straight. It rarely happens, but when it does, the situation invariably involves broke airplanes, junior crews and bad weather. A terrible combination to by flying around exhausted. If it were not for the "Whitlow Letter" and the FAA's stand on a 16 hour duty day I have no doubt the airline would run crews past 20 hours of duty.
Again, just like the drinking issue - call in sick when you are physiologically not safe to fly.
A2 and Simon - the most recent study I have read was by Dr. William Dement of Stanford University. His study was quoted extensively in Air Line Pilot magazine's March 2003 publication. To quote, "fatigue has a lot in common with hypoxia and and the effects of alcohol in that a person is generally not aware of its onset. People commonly underestimate the effect alcohol is having on them when they have had a few drinks. Similarly, in NASA's tests, in which pilots rated the effect of fatigue on their performance, they consistently underate it."
Interestingly, the military hands out "go pills" and "no go pills" to pilots. These pills are amphetamines and tranquilizers and that would be considered disqualifying "drug use" for us civillian pilots.
Darn near a jet - ALPA has done a lot with fatigue issues - (including promotion of Dr. Phil's career - did you know ALPA was one of his first clients as an "expert witness?") Our employers, or rather crew schedulers, could simply care less how fatigued the crews are. Their job is to staff an airplane going from point A to point B, period. Our airline allows pilots to be worked a sixteen hour duty day, followed by nine hours off duty (to get home, shower and sleep) in preparation for another 16 hour day. This can go on for 6 days straight. It rarely happens, but when it does, the situation invariably involves broke airplanes, junior crews and bad weather. A terrible combination to by flying around exhausted. If it were not for the "Whitlow Letter" and the FAA's stand on a 16 hour duty day I have no doubt the airline would run crews past 20 hours of duty.
Again, just like the drinking issue - call in sick when you are physiologically not safe to fly.
Last edited: