Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

First documented crash caused by SJS?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

BushwickBill

Registered Abuser
Joined
Jul 13, 2005
Posts
822
Everyone keeps claiming if the Euros do low time pilots it must be ok to have PFT low time pilots fly RJ's. This sounds like a total chinese fire drill. Let the games begin...




Following article is from Don Phillips of the International Herald Tribune on the sad story of the Helios accident. Thought you might be interested.
****************************************************************************************************************************************************

By Don Phillips

PARIS: The crew members of a Cypriot airliner that crashed Aug. 14 near Athens became confused by a series of alarms as the plane climbed, failing to recognize that the cabin was not pressurizing until they grew mentally disoriented because of lack of oxygen and passed out, according to several people connected with the investigation.

Complicating the cockpit confusion, neither the German pilot nor the young, inexperienced Cypriot co-pilot could speak the same language fluently, and each had difficulty understanding how the other spoke English, the worldwide language of air traffic control.

A total of 121 people were killed in the crash after the plane climbed and flew on autopilot, circling near Athens as it was programmed to do until one engine stopped running because of a lack of fuel. The sudden imbalance of power, with only one engine operating, caused the autopilot to disengage and the plane to begin its final descent.

The Greek authorities have made cryptic statements hinting at oxygen problems but have so far not announced the full findings of investigators.

The people interviewed for this article agreed to do so on condition that they not be identified because none are official spokesmen for the investigation and because of political sensitivities arising from a Cypriot plane crashing in Greece.

Investigators pieced together the story of the crash from numerous sources. In the wreckage, they found the first solid clues--the pressurization valve and an air outflow valve set incorrectly. Air traffic control tapes provided information on the confusion in the cockpit. The plane had a sophisticated new flight data recorder that provided a wealth of information. There were maintenance records from the night before, and investigators interviewed the mechanics who worked on the plane.

Among other things, the investigators determined that the pilot was not in his seat because he was up trying to solve a problem that turned out to be not the greatest threat facing him.

The plane that crashed, a Boeing 737, underwent maintenance the night before. The maintenance crew apparently left a pressurization controller rotary knob out of place, according to the officials connected to the investigation, and the crew did not catch the mistake during preflight checks the next day. This meant that the plane could not pressurize.

At 10,000 feet, as designed, an alarm went off to warn the crew that the plane would not pressurize. However, the crew members mistakenly thought that the alarm horn was a warning to tell them that their controls were not set properly for takeoff, the officials said. The same horn is used for both conditions, although the it will sound for takeoff configuration only while the plane is still on the ground.

The crew continued the climb on autopilot. At 14,000 feet, oxygen masks deployed as designed and a master caution light illuminated in the cockpit. Another alarm sounded at about the same time on an unrelated matter, warning that there was insufficient cooling air in the compartment housing avionics equipment.

The radio tapes showed that this created tremendous confusion in the cockpit. Normally an aircraft cabin is held at 8,000 feet pressure, so the crew at over 14,000 feet would already be experiencing some disorientation because of a lack of oxygen.

During this time, the German captain and the Cypriot co-pilot discovered they had no common language and that their English, while good enough for normal air traffic control purposes, was not good enough for complicated technical conversation in fixing the problem.

The crew members called the maintenance base in Cyprus and were told that the circuit breaker to turn off the loud new alarm was in a cabinet behind the captain. The captain got up from his seat to look for the circuit breaker, apparently ignoring the confused co-pilot.

As the plane continued to climb on autopilot, the air grew so thin that the crew became seriously impaired. The captain passed out first on the floor of the cockpit, followed by the co-pilot, who remained in his seat, according to the officials.

The autopilot did as it was programmed to do, flying the plane at 34,000 feet to Athens and entering a holding pattern. It remained in a long circling pattern, shadowed by Greek military jets, until fuel ran low and one engine quit.

Boeing, the maker of the plane, issued a notice shortly after the crash to airlines that it would revise flight crew training manuals to stress to crews that they must understand how the various warning systems work and what to do about them.

The notice stresses that the takeoff configuration warning horn will not sound under any circumstances after the plane has left the ground. The same horn will then be used only for a cabin altitude warning. The company notice said there had been other instances of confusion over the horn by pilots.

"Confusion between the cabin altitude warning horn and the takeoff configuration warning horn can be resolved if the crew remembers that the takeoff configuration warning horn is only armed when the airplane is on the ground,'' the notice said. ''If this horn is activated in flight, it indicates that the cabin altitude has reached 10,000 feet.''

International Herald Tribune
 
BushwickBill said:
Everyone keeps claiming if the Euros do low time pilots it must be ok to have PFT low time pilots fly RJ's. This sounds like a total chinese fire drill. Let the games begin...






I wonder why the author of this article left out the report that a flight attendant, who had just started taking flying lessons, had supplemental oxygen on and disengaged the autopilot and started a descent (over an hour after it started holding). This article even says that the fuel imbalance disengaged the autopilot, but F-16 pilots saw this guy on the flight deck.
But it still ran out of fuel (not that he had the skills to land a 737 anyway).
Interesting.

http://www.flightinternational.com/Articles/2005/08/30/Navigation/186/201214/Helios+737+tried+to+send+Mayday.html
http://www.news24.com/News24/World/News/0,,2-10-1462_1758630,00.html
 
BushwickBill said:
Everyone keeps claiming if the Euros do low time pilots it must be ok to have PFT low time pilots fly RJ's. This sounds like a total chinese fire drill. Let the games begin...






BushwickBill, What are you talking about??????

The only conclusion I could draw was that there was a huge language barrier between the two pilots as well as some issues with properly recognizing warning annunciators in the cockpit. Not to mention the confusion that would come from two pilots from different companies trying to fly together!!! One could speculate for days about what happened, let the pro's (not the mongers on flightinfo) conduct the investigation!!!

BushwhackerBill, you sound like Geraldo Rivera covering a story!!!
 
Last edited:
I could be mistaken but somewhere I read that the Capt. had over 7,000 hours in the B737 and the F/O has around 3,500 in the airplane? Not excactly low time pilots. I believe my source was Aviation Week.
 
Last edited:
The First Officer had something like 7,500 hours total time. He was, I belive, a Cypriot himself. The country would demand that a certain number of pilots be nationals. Hiring all Brits to fly wouldn't look very good.

7,500 hours is hardly inexperienced, but it seems his airline had paired people with no common background and it may have lead to a serious breakdown of CRM. If the Europeans follow ususal form, this lack of synergy and human factors will be followed in depth. I imagine that the airline in question did not have enough experience itself to monitor crew quality, and assure that they had the most appropriate people flying their bread-and-butter. Maybe now they'll wake up, pay more, and demand the best. But not likely.
 
flying4food said:
BushwickBill, What are you talking about??????

The only conclusion I could draw was that there was a huge language barrier between the two pilots as well as some issues with properly recognizing warning annunciators in the cockpit. Not to mention the confusion that would come from two pilots from different companies trying to fly together!!! One could speculate for days about what happened, let the pro's (not the mongers on flightinfo) conduct the investigation!!!

BushwhackerBill, you sound like Geraldo Rivera covering a story!!!

The hangar is all about Geraldo. I'm pretty sure if the master caution was going the cabin alt light was going as well as the audible alarm I'd put my mask on. Of course thats getting into darwinism and thats a different thread.
 
Actually, to clarify this phenomenon of SJS to all you folks. IT DOES NOT ACTUALLY EXIST!!!!!! Really! I had my buddy in med school look it up for me, and his research let me to this conclusion. SJS was made up by a bunch of regional pilots who are disgruntled with their jobs and don't have anything better to do with their lives but sit on a computer and talk sh!t about other pilots. Maybe you should take a job as a greeter at Wal-Mart, they seem to look happy, maybe that's what all of you need to change your lousy outlook.

Shocking!!
 
Last edited:
Well, actually!!!

Shocker said:
Actually, to clarify this phenomenon of SJS to all you folks. IT DOES NOT ACTUALLY EXIST!!!!!! Really! I had my buddy in med school look it up for me, and his research let me to this conclusion. SJS was made up by a bunch of regional pilots who are disgruntled with their jobs and don't have anything better to do with their lives but sit on a computer and talk sh!t about other pilots. Maybe you should take a job as a greater at Wal-Mart, they seem to look happy, maybe that's what all of you need to change your lousy outlook.

Shocking!!

SJS does exist our profession, and also other professions, it’s just not called SJS!!!

If you research any microeconomics text, you’ll find there are aesthetic qualities to every occupation, including professional aeronautics. The qualities directly effect the supply of labor in that particular workforce, and that supply directly determines what the compensation (pay and benefits) is for worker in said workforce. If the perceived job qualities suck, labor supply will be relatively low, and your equilibrium price (compensation rate) will be relatively higher. Conversely, if the perceived job qualities are good, labor supply will be higher, and your equilibrium price (compensation rate) will be lower. This explains why a night manager at Taco Bell makes more than your average Shinny CRJ pilot, even though pilots, for the most part, are more educated and highly skilled/trained. There are other factors involved to determine the equilibrium price of labor, but this is one of them.

Therefore, many persons are drawn to the fact that they will be an all-important AIRLINE PILOT of a fancy new jet. Many fancy jet drivers = lower equilibrium pay rates; this is a simple and universal economic fact. This also explains why people in this profession, at all levels (Southwest), are willing to pay big bucks to get that coveted Shinny Jet Job. Just look a the PFT ads in any aviation publication, they use the glamour aspect of airline flying to sell their product!

Don’t get me wrong, I to find myself falling into this trap. Every once in awhile I find myself debating the idea of forking out $8000 for a 737 type to go to Southwest.

Though what ticks me off is the fact that ALPA leadership doesn’t apply economic principles, such as this, to contracts, but instead uses the archaic/pre-deregulation technique of begging (though sometimes with leverage) for higher compensation.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top