Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

First documented crash caused by SJS?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
You guys do understand that - in most countries - you can simply buy what it is your looking for? Especially in Greece.. The pilots probably had a rich uncle buy them a right seat or left seat job..
 
I find this whole SJS thing to be very insulting to all pilots. I am sure the fighter pilots in WW2, the korean war, and vietnam were all in thier 20s ( more like 18 in ww2) and did not eaven have 200 hours in some cases. Also since when did it become a sin to enjoy your job. And the 737 was not flown by low time pilots, maybe if they wernt so old they would have been able to survive the decompression long enough to DON and 100%. Think about that next time your out of shape a$$ sits next to a SJS inflicted F/O they may be putting the O2 mask on you long after you start seeing stars.
 
What I think is funny is that 99.9% of all the guys claiming "SJS" syndrom are sitting in an RJ.. Does that not qualify as "SJS" or what?

A 737 is faaar from being an "SJ."
 
BushwickBill said:
You need to read the start of the thread.

Maybe you need to show me what it is I need to read..

Your thread says "First documented crash caused by SJS" and it appears the crash involved a 737? So.. your claiming this crash was due to SJS? Thus making the 737 a shiny jet, correct?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom