pipe
fuggedaboutit
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2005
- Posts
- 660
Nowhere in my post did I say that every cent earned by a company was due directly to shareholders. Advertising and sponsoring and community involvement are all expenses that have likely been factored to bring value to the company in some way that will translate into increased profits. Charity also is rewarded economically. So, you can take your socialist ideals and put them where they belong (you and half of the posters on this thread). I still contend that any company that wants to stay solvent has a duty to cut costs where needed when needed. If cutting jobs causes them to lose so much in morale or productivity that they lose money, then that would be counterproductive. I contend that a cut in pilot jobs (while completely tragic, and I hope it does not ever happen) is not going to bring great hate on a company like Fed Ex when furloughs are rampant in the industry. So, the bottom line is if a company needs to cut jobs because of lack of desire for their service, it is THEIR RESPONSIBILITY to do so even if it does cause some pain to the jobs involved. THIS ISN'T A SOCIALIST COUNTRY.
Well I guess we'll just agree to disagree. I don't know where you're family's first 10 million is going to come from to get into the club. It's getting to be fairly assured that hard work ain't gonna get it done.
Maybe you've got family money.
PIPE