Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

FAA wants NO DISTRACTIONS for pilots

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

waveflyer

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 9, 2005
Posts
10,005
FAA wants no pilot distractions

Top Stories   |  Updated 6h 7m ago
By Alan Levin, USA TODAY

Federal aviation regulators are prodding airlines today to take concrete steps that would ensure their pilots are not distracted by laptops, cellphones and extraneous conversations.

Spurred by a series of recent accidents and incidents in which pilots' attention was diverted from flying, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) will issue a notice to carriers today calling for better internal rules and training on the issue. The notice was obtained by USA TODAY.

Cockpit distractions and lack of professionalism have become top aviation safety issues in the past year. Two Northwest Airlines pilots flew 150 miles past their destination in October because they were working on laptops. A crash on Feb. 12, 2009, near Buffalo, which killed 50 people, was triggered in part because pilots were chatting and not paying attention to flight conditions, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) concluded.

"There is no room for distraction when your job is to get people safely to their destinations," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood says in a statement to be issued today. "The traveling public expects professional pilots to focus on flying and on safety at all times."

The FAA action follows recommendations by the NTSB to become more aggressive in attacking the problem.

In February, the NTSB classified the FAA's response to the issue as "unacceptable" because of delays in acting. The NTSB made the first of several calls for tighter cockpit discipline in 2007.

The NTSB will hold a three-day public forum on improving professionalism among pilots and air-traffic controllers starting May 18.

Airlines agree that cockpit distractions need to be addressed and already have begun examining their policies and procedures, says David Castelveter, spokesman for the Air Transport Association.

In its notice to airlines today, the FAA emphasizes that carriers should take specific steps to eliminate cockpit distractions.

The agency says airlines should create a "safety culture" — a top-to-bottom expectation that safety will be taken seriously — that emphasizes eliminating distractions. The FAA calls on carriers to set more specific rules and improve training.

The FAA's notice to airlines is voluntary, but failure to follow its suggestions can lead to additional inspections and scrutiny of records on safety efforts.

The explosion in the use of cellphones and other personal electronic devices has had a troubling impact on aviation and other modes of transportation, the NTSB has found.

The co-pilot of the regional flight that crashed near Buffalo had used her phone to send text messages while the plane taxied toward the runway in Newark before the flight, investigators found.

The messages played no role in the accident, but investigators said they were part of a disturbing trend.
 
Two of the biggest let downs in aviation history, Babbitt and Prater. We all had such high hopes for both. Sadly both have let us down immensely. Proof that if you don't fly the line often enough, you are completely out of touch. JP spent a majority of his career in union work. Same with Babitt.

From my perspective, neither one has done much for our profession.

Let's all just be robots on the flight deck.
 
They may not know what they are talking about, but they will regulate you.

I beleive this is a memo and not a law for many reasons.
 
No distractions huh... Ok so then the FAA is going to guarantee and refinance my mortgage (even though it's now over double what my house is now worth) The FAA is going to deal with the daily stresses at home with the family. It's going to cover the medical bills so I don't have to worry about that. It's going to stop my certain downgrade and even possible furlough as Delta dismantles my company. The FAA is going to assure realistic schedules with proper rest, oh wait.....

We all live with distractions that can't be legislated away no matter what is done. That's what life is.
 
How about some more REST/SLEEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
That's the biggest distraction, that's been put on the backburner!
 
The NTSB appears to be driving this more than the FAA....Babbitt is FAA and can do only so much IMHO. I'm not ALPA and don't know him personally and I'm not defending him.

The angst is toward the NTSB and the pressure being applied by Oberstar and a few on the Hill it would seem. Short of resigning, Babbitt can only provide some sanity to the discussions from his perspective, a pilot's, which is something lacking at the NTSB and Hill level I suspect.

The FAA is left to react and make changes to hideous ideas and thoughts that provide no additional safety to the profession or to the traveling public. I don't know if Babbitt has pushed for stricter rest rules but suspect he has but it is a tough balancing act I'm sure.

I suspect I'll get flamed for my comments but again, I'm not either for or against Babbitt but in this case the FAA/Babbitt with the NTSB out front on getting the public riled up about this.
 
We all live with distractions that can't be legislated away no matter what is done. That's what life is.

You're absolutely right. There is no possible way to eliminate distractions in the cockpit. This "memo" was intended to emphasize mitigating those distractions which the crewmember has control over.

This was published as an InFO (Information for Operators). Most 121 Operators already have the recommendations in place.

With the crash of Colgan and the overflight of Northwest, there is probably a lot of pressure on the FAA from Congress and the NTSB related to this. My guess is that the FAA had to do "something" to address their concerns.

Don't make this "memo" into something bigger than it actually is.

Now about those rest requirements.... :confused:
 
Believe it or not there was a time when we flew trips without laptops, Blackberries and Ipods up front (because they didn't exist)...and guess what? We survived!

We read the newspaper and stared out the window alot. Trust me it is possible to go without your crackberry for 2.5 hours. It is.

Like with any marriage, one must choose their battles wisely. Make a big stink with this and we are likely to see an FAR come down the pipe...
 
Believe it or not there was a time when we flew trips without laptops, Blackberries and Ipods up front (because they didn't exist)...and guess what? We survived!

We read the newspaper and stared out the window alot. Trust me it is possible to go without your crackberry for 2.5 hours. It is.

Like with any marriage, one must choose their battles wisely. Make a big stink with this and we are likely to see an FAR come down the pipe...

Did we have any mishaps due to distractions then? Yep.

Again, let's get to the real problems here.
 
Did we have any mishaps due to distractions then? Yep.

Again, let's get to the real problems here.

FAR 121.542 ["Sterile Cockpit"] was created because of mishaps due to distractions (i.e. "real problems") back "then". I don't think the FAA should skip over any problem affecting safety, no matter how big or small.

Real problems? I agree that cockpit distractions are not the biggest problem facing the industry, but it is obviously a problem nontheless. An InFO published is an easy way for the FAA to quickly "remind" operators about distractions. It also satisfies the public appetite for a response from the FAA.

Now, pilot rest? Qualifications? Those are much larger problems in the industry. They are also regulatory pending problems. This means that there is a tremendous amount of work required to issue them, not even including the lobbying from the Air Carriers.

Regs take a very long time to publish (generally 3-5 years). I understand that these are being "fast tracked", but in government speak, that might mean 2-3 years.
 
This growing trend could be because we no longer fly modern airplanes, instead we program them. The planes fly themselves and the pilots watch, this can be boring. Get rid of the auto-pilots that will keep the pilots focused on their job. What do you think.
 
This growing trend could be because we no longer fly modern airplanes, instead we program them. The planes fly themselves and the pilots watch, this can be boring. Get rid of the auto-pilots that will keep the pilots focused on their job. What do you think.

I think the problem is that we are all flying the airplane longer, not "no longer flying the airplane".
 
No distractions huh... Ok so then the FAA is going to guarantee and refinance my mortgage (even though it's now over double what my house is now worth) The FAA is going to deal with the daily stresses at home with the family. It's going to cover the medical bills so I don't have to worry about that. It's going to stop my certain downgrade and even possible furlough as Delta dismantles my company.

Here's the purpose of InFO 10003:

"To emphasize to crewmembers and operators that engaging in tasks not directly related to required flight duties, including using personal electronic devices (PED), constitutes a safety risk."

The intent of the InFO was never to eliminate all distractions. In reality, it re-emphasizes what 99% of the pilots already know.

"FAA Wants No Distractions for Pilots" was the USAToday article.
 
I like the bit in there about the public professionalism forum. I'm gonna show up in a friggin rat suit and show them what professionalism is. It starts with our leaders not only at the airline, but in mgmt too, and even higher than that. They want to talk about professionalism, go talk to any regional airline CEO (ie Phildo Trenary), and you'll find yourself some fine professionalism. IMHO as long as the licks keep coming the trend will continue. The reason for a so called lack of professionalism isn't because an airplane is easier to fly, its because the industry is sooo far in the dumps it's gonna take an act of god to get it out.
 
IMO this whole thing is a bunch of BS. We are all on front street right now because of the actions of a few pilots who were lacking in their professionalism. We are pros at this for a reason, we want to do the right thing and do a good job. But, just as with any industry (particularly in politics) you will have some bad apples.
 
This growing trend could be because we no longer fly modern airplanes, instead we program them. The planes fly themselves and the pilots watch, this can be boring. Get rid of the auto-pilots that will keep the pilots focused on their job. What do you think.


Get rid of autopilots and altitude bust will go through the roof, nav errors will increase, landing accidents will multiply etc,
 

Latest resources

Back
Top