Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

F-16s buzz ASA?

  • Thread starter Thread starter HoserASA
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 17

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

HoserASA

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2005
Posts
666
FAA: F-16’s flew so close to commuter plane, alarms went off

Associated Press
Published: April 9, 2010
» 0 Comments | Post a Comment
CINCINNATI (AP) - Authorities say two F-16 jet fighters came so
close to a 70-seat commuter plane over southern Ohio that they
triggered a cockpit alarm, and the Atlantic Southeast Airlines
pilots maneuvered away from them.
ASA says Flight 5202, flying from Cleveland to Atlanta, landed
safely in Georgia on time Thursday. A spokeswoman says the two
pilots had sight of the F-16s and were able to keep on their flight
plan.
Federal Aviation Administration officials say the planes were
operated by the Ohio National Guard. A message was left Friday for
the Columbus-based Guard.
FAA spokesman Tony Molinaro says federal and military
authorities will investigate. He says radar showed the F-16s were
flying at 30,000 feet when they should have been no higher than
29,000 feet.

Information from: The Cincinnati Enquirer, http://www.enquirer.com

Hoser
ROLL TIDE!
 
Wonder if the Capt was KK? Maybe he just talked them into a slow inverted pass for a photo op.....

-Burners on!
 
The FAA can only violate a military pilot if 1) they have a pilot certificate (which is one reason why some avoid getting one until they are ready to leave the service) and 2) the FAA knows who it is. Usual military policy is not to release the IDs of pilots. If someone has a complaint, they must file it with the Commanding Officer. That said, the military has it's own justice system. If an investigation proves this wasn't just an accident or a malfunction, those two pilots could get hammered by their own Chain of Command.
 
The FAA can only violate a military pilot if 1) they have a pilot certificate (which is one reason why some avoid getting one until they are ready to leave the service) and 2) the FAA knows who it is. Usual military policy is not to release the IDs of pilots. If someone has a complaint, they must file it with the Commanding Officer. That said, the military has it's own justice system. If an investigation proves this wasn't just an accident or a malfunction, those two pilots could get hammered by their own Chain of Command.

Indeed, they probably will get their hand slapped a little bit, but no prospective employer will ever know what they did (assuming they didn't have a civilian license,) and they will never have to tell anyone outside the military.

-Any regional guy who screwed and pulled something like this would probably never make it to a decent major, but these guys can pull something like this a few times, and no one will ever know.
 
Two of those fighter jets passed my ATR one day back in 1999 on the way down to Fort Walton. VMC'd the bitch, ending in a split S over Dothan but recovered by 500 feet, and continued to a normal landing on time in Wally World. Bad thing was I had to fill out a RIF!
 
Do they violate military pilots like they would have if the roles were reversed?

As was already said, the military will most likely not release the names. Many military pilots do not even have a pilot certificate and a good number don't have any aspirations of a civilian flying careers so it wouldn't really matter anyway.

As far as the roles reversed comment. It's apples to oranges. Until you have lead a 4vX opposed surface attack ride, where 1 person is in charge of 3 other jets, while running a Radar/Targeting Pod/HMCS, with multiple simulated surface to air missiles (SAMs), fighting at least 2 adversary aircraft, in MOA's that altitude limits change daily, then I suggest you hold your comments to yourself.

Trust me, the military has their way of taking care of this sort of situation. Which can be much worse than a FAA violation!
 
Last edited:
"As far as the roles reversed comment. It's apples to oranges. Until you have lead a 4vX opposed surface attack ride, where 1 person is in charge of 3 other jets, while running a Radar/Targeting Pod/HMCS, with multiple simulated surface to air missiles (SAMs), fighting at least 2 adversary aircraft, in MOA's that altitude limits change daily, then I suggest you hold your comments to yourself."

With the greatest respect for our very much appreciated military, I really must object. There are rules everyone has to obey as far as safety is concerned. I am not qualified to translate the statement quoted, however I would trust that this incident will be fully investigated to determine what measures may need to be taken to prevent a similar event in the future.

Human error is natural, and learning from experience is vital.
 
As was already said, the military will most likely not release the names. Many military pilots do not even have a pilot certificate and a good number don't have any aspirations of a civilian flying careers so it wouldn't really matter anyway.
Of course! No military pilot would degrade himself and fly a civilian airliner!

As far as the roles reversed comment. It's apples to oranges. Until you have lead a 4vX opposed surface attack ride, where 1 person is in charge of 3 other jets, while running a Radar/Targeting Pod/HMCS, with multiple simulated surface to air missiles (SAMs), fighting at least 2 adversary aircraft, in MOA's that altitude limits change daily, then I suggest you hold your comments to yourself.
Man that is sexy... I am sure the chicks dig it when you say the same thing at the "club", sunglasses on... bag unzipped halfway.... flying form with your watch


Part 121 flights operate thru MOAs?

Trust me, the military has their way of taking care of this sort of situation. Which can be much worse than a FAA violation!
Talk about Air Superiority!!
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom