Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Engine Failure in Flight

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Joined
Sep 5, 2004
Posts
113
...I have always been taught to immeadiately pitch for Best Glide when the engine fails, and then start looking for a place to land and turning. After you have that under control, you start running your restart checklist, and then your shutdown checklist.

Now I am at a school where they want you to immeadiately run your checklist, and then if it wont restart pitch for best glide, and look for a place to land and turn.

How were you guys taught? How would you do it in an emergency as PIC?
 
Id pitch first. If you dont get it restarted then you may have wasted precious time looking at the checklist. I use ALARMS. Airspeed (Best glide), Landing spot, Air restart, Radios (121.5/7700), Mayday, Secure (shut off fuel, master, pop doors, etc.)
 
I was taught how you were. I think that a lot of accidents are caused by the pilot not maintaining proper airspeed after an engine failure and the resultant stall/spin. In my opinion, it is important to trim the airplane for best glide, figure out where you are going to put it and set yourself up for a forced landing, then worry about restarting it.

Maybe your school is figuring that you need to slow from cruise speed to best glide speed anyway so you might as well be doing something. To that I counter, but what if the engine fails in the climb? You need to immediately pitch it over and establish glide speed or you will get to do a stall recovery with the restart checklist in one hand.
 
For a single, this is what I taught -
Airspeed (Vg)
Best landing spot
Checklist following a flow if you haven't hit the ground yet.
 
TEXAN AVIATOR said:
For a single, this is what I taught -
Airspeed (Vg)
Best landing spot
Checklist following a flow if you haven't hit the ground yet.
I do it in this order. If I knew what caused the failure i.e. carb ice, forgot to adjust the mixture on climb/descent, need to change fuel tanks, I'd do that action before pitching for best glide.
 
I was taught to think. Viper has the correct answer. Why go through all of the monkey motion if you just forgot to switch the tanks or turn on a fuel pump? If the problem is obvious then what Texas Aviator said.

'Sled
 
You only have one basic duty in that airplane, and it never changes, and never goes away.

Fly the airplane.
 
viper548 said:
I do it in this order. If I knew what caused the failure i.e. carb ice, forgot to adjust the mixture on climb/descent, need to change fuel tanks, I'd do that action before pitching for best glide.
I'd do that =while= pitching for best glide.

The idea is to have an automatic initial reaction that will =always= work. Engine fails - pitch for best glide always works. And it only takes a second.

(Avbug? You've flown enough different aircraft; certainly far more than me. With my limited experience, I have never come across a single that didn't approximate best glide by simply putting it into a cruise level pitch attitude. Have you?)

Anything else can kill you. You want to troubleshoot as your first step on an engine failure on takeoff?
 
I've also read that if you are flying a carbureted airplane it might be a good idea to put on carb heat simultaneously as you pitch for best glide. Why? Because if ice is the reason for the failure, the engine may cool down too much for that checklist item, when completed later, to do much good.
 
viper548 said:
I do it in this order. If I knew what caused the failure i.e. carb ice, forgot to adjust the mixture on climb/descent, need to change fuel tanks, I'd do that action before pitching for best glide.

Agree with this, but I do it AS I am also pitching as some others have said.
 
Your school is wrong. Engine failure or fire is a memory item in most planes. Especially single pilot! If you're not familiar enough with the operation of the engine without using a checklist then you're not ready to fly it alone.
 
(Avbug? You've flown enough different aircraft; certainly far more than me. With my limited experience, I have never come across a single that didn't approximate best glide by simply putting it into a cruise level pitch attitude. Have you?)

I don't honestly know. I've never thought about the pitch attitude during an engine failure.

Unless I'm on intruments, most of the time it's strictly a feel issue, and I probably am not looking inside the cockpit. One airplane I regularly fly, a single, has a flight manual which is placarded on the cover "Nothing in this manual is to be believed." It's a foriegn airplane with a foriegn flight manual, and none of the numbers or speeds are close to the book, even if it were believable, due to numerous mods. I have no idea what the "best glide" speed is, and don't really care. I know where it feels right, and that's where I'll fly it, eyes outside.

The airplane has no checklist, and attempting to use one would be a really bad idea, especially in an emergency. It's a very "hands-on" airplane that you really don't want to let go of, especially when things aren't going well.

From a practical point of view, however, one intuitively knows that if one is trimmed for a speed higher than best glide, one is going to have to hold back pressure at best glide...until it's trimmed off. I can't see any value in pitching up to obtain best glide speed...doing as you say and holding the present attitude until the speed bleeds down to best glide is probably a much more preferable choice, but it needs to be temperated with consideration for obstacles, terrain, etc. When I've experienced engine failures before, much of the time they've been within a few feet of the surface, up to a couple hundred feet, because that's where the airplane is operated much of the time. It's operated often in very cut up mountainous terrain, and therefore a prime consideration isn't how far I can glide, but avoiding trees, powerlines, rocks, etc.

I think too much emphasis is put on best glide speed, too. How often are you going to need to stretch the glide in a single, vs. always keeping the airplane over a decent landing spot? Perhaps more important, especially if one is going to execute checklists, attempt restarts or relights, and so on, is minimum sink speed...which is not the same as best glide speed, and is often not taught.

Best glide provides the greatest possible distance, but minimum sink provides the greatest possible time to impact. Distance isn't always the critical issue, but often as not, time is. It may afford more time to relight, more time to communicate, etc. Minimum sink is also the preferable speed in white-out forced landings, water landings, etc. Especially glassy water landings.

But back to your question...I have no idea what the pitch attitude is of any airplane I fly, respective of best glide. I'd say it depends a lot on the center of gravity and loading, etc. I can tell you what it sounds like and feels like, though.
 
Best Glide is the most important part. The school that i used to teach at always wanted to teach the student that best glide is 80kts intead of 70kts in a C172. (I think that's right--it's been a while.) Anyway, by pitching for a slower or faster speed, the gliding distance is reduced. What if someone were to pitch for 80 and end up 50 yards short of a suitable landing area? Even in the Lear I do a lot of power off decents to conserve fuel and pitch for Vref +60 for best glide.
 
QueensPilot said:
I've also read that if you are flying a carbureted airplane it might be a good idea to put on carb heat simultaneously as you pitch for best glide. Why? Because if ice is the reason for the failure, the engine may cool down too much for that checklist item, when completed later, to do much good.

That is the reason that some people say to run the checklist first. It is a valid concern, but like many of these arguments it is a case of people overthinking to problem.

I agree with waht everybody else is saying. Pitch for best glide, run the checklist, and look for a landing site simutaniously. The engine failure checklist in almost any single only takes about 30 seconds max. You should have praticed this enough times to do it by feel and memory. All the while holding the airplane level and slowing to best glide, while looking for a landing site.
 
I dont think its likely that your engine would go from perfect health to totally dead instantly from carb ice anyhow.
 
Last edited:
Cutlass1287 said:
I dont think its likely that your engine would go from perfect health to totally dead instantly from carb ice anyhow.

Think again.

Carb Ice is probably the second most comon reason for engine failure (right behind fuel exaustion/starvation).

The most likely scenerio is where you are flying along on a nice fall or spring day with the OAT about 50F. Your carb is slowly iceing up, and when you reduce power to start your descent the throttle plate (which is covered in ice) completely chokes off all airflow in the iced up venturi. THis is why I always add "full throttle" to my engine failure checklist even if the checklist in the POH dosen't mention it.

It happens all the time. Look at the NTSB reports where "engine falied because of undetermined reason" is part of the cause. If you look closely at the weather conditions you will see they are useually an OAT of 55-30F, the most dangerous temps for carb ice. By the time the investigators get there, the ice has melted, and the culprit is never found.
 
I agree 100% with the general consensus...fly the airplane, pitch to best glide, and run the appropriate checklist (memory or paper, depending on the situation).

While Avbug's comment about the applicability of best glide is probably true for the most part (the only one I had quit cold in a single was at 75 feet and Vx...not sure what I pitched to, but it worked), unfortunately the PTS is worded "Establishes and maintains the recommended best-glide airspeed, ±10 knots."

With regard to Midlife's question, higher-drag airplanes tend to have a lower nose attitude for best glide speed...holding a Stearman in a level flight attitude with the engine out will seriously degrade its already rock-like gliding qualities ;)

Fly safe!

David
 
avbug said:
I don't honestly know. I've never thought about the pitch attitude during an engine failure.

Unless I'm on instruments, most of the time it's strictly a feel issue, and I probably am not looking inside the cockpit.
Neither am I. I'm talking about cruise level pitch based on visual cues, not the AI (unless in IMC where it works just as well).

The concept is that I've seen many student and low-time pilots spend a heck of a long time (as much as 3-5 seconds) getting to best glide when all they have to do is keep looking out the window as they establish (or maintain) a cruise level pitch attitude while they look for a place to put down and start their troubleshooting.

Thanks. Guess you've been flying long enough that it's so automatic that you don't need to think about it for yourself and aren't worried about how to teach it to others.
 
MauleSkinner said:
With regard to Midlife's question, higher-drag airplanes tend to have a lower nose attitude for best glide speed...holding a Stearman in a level flight attitude with the engine out will seriously degrade its already rock-like gliding qualities
Thanks David. Guess I haven't flown high-enough drag airplanes to see it yet.
 
avbug said:
I've never thought about the pitch attitude during an engine failure.

For most GA airplanes, the pitch attitude for best glide is very close to nose-on-the-horizon. Best glide is about 6 degrees angle of attack, and the glide angle is about 6 degrees...

I was taught (and teach) glide-grass-gas.
 
Go for best glide speed while doing the checklist. When you get the speed, trim the airplane to help you maintain it. Best glide speed is very important and may make the difference between an on-airport or off-airport landing. Don't forget to practice this occasionally.
 
I dont think its likely that your engine would go from perfect health to totally dead instantly from carb ice anyhow.

Really? I guess you've had enough carb ice related failures to know.

I've had it stone cold and dead fairly quickly in ice and ended up landing in that condition because it couldn't be restarted. Perhaps a few more tries and I'll find out you're really right.

Thanks. Guess you've been flying long enough that it's so automatic that you don't need to think about it for yourself and aren't worried about how to teach it to others.

No, it's done intuitively, and the student should understand it intuitively. The first few hours in the pattern with a primary student, I use the same airspeed for takeoff, approach, and landing. The student only memorizes or knows one airspeed, one feeling, one way to fly, intially. The student understands that speed, knows the power settings, the feel power on and power off, the trim settings, by feel, without thinking. I can cover up the instruments and have the student set the speed and uncover them to show the student he or she can achieve it. Each time.

After that, the student will always think something is wrong if the engine is working properly, because I'll never let him go long without an engine failure.

As far as the attitude, I think it's a wrong way to look at it. I don't care about the attitude; that could vary with loading, weight, whatever...but what's on the dial, and what's in the hand and in the ear, I do care about. If the airplane feels like it's at best glide and I can confirm it by checking, fine.

Best glide is only important if you need to glide. Most of the time you're looking at a landing site beneath you, if it's a complete power failure. In that case, minimum sink is much more important.

How many people teach minimum sink?
 
avbug said:
How many people teach minimum sink?

Well, speaking as a glider instructor... ;)

I noticed the other day that the Aviat Husky lists a minimum sink speed in the AFM...first I've seen it in a power plane...kind of refreshing!

Fly safe!

David
 
MauleSkinner said:
Well, speaking as a glider instructor... ;)

I noticed the other day that the Aviat Husky lists a minimum sink speed in the AFM...first I've seen it in a power plane...kind of refreshing!
Speaking as another glider instructor...

I'm currently flying an Astra and they even give you the best L/D speed - it's not listed as such, but that's what it is none the less. We could always introduce the concept of "Speed to Fly". :p

If I were king of the world, I would require a certain amount of training in gliders, aerobatics, and tailwheels for EVERY fixed-wing pilot. There'd be a whole lot less crash'n going on. But hey that's just me and I'm not the king of the world.

'Sled
 
Cutlass1287 said:
...I have always been taught to immeadiately pitch for Best Glide when the engine fails, and then start looking for a place to land and turning. After you have that under control, you start running your restart checklist, and then your shutdown checklist.

Now I am at a school where they want you to immeadiately run your checklist, and then if it wont restart pitch for best glide, and look for a place to land and turn.

How were you guys taught? How would you do it in an emergency as PIC?

A wiser man than myself once said:

Aviate, navigate, investigate, communicate.

My aerobatics instructor gave me the “evacuate” option as well.
 
Lead Sled said:
I'm currently flying an Astra and they even give you the best L/D speed - it's not listed as such, but that's what it is none the less. We could always introduce the concept of "Speed to Fly". :p 'Sled

You'd not only have to adjust your McCready ring for anticipated climb rate, but also keep track of massive changes in TAS over the 40,000-ft altitude range for best penetration speed in that Astra;)

Fly safe!

David
 
avbug said:
Really? I guess you've had enough carb ice related failures to know.

Actually I have had one, and the engine did in fact die as soon as I pulled the power, and I had to make a power off 180 (this happened abeam the numbers). I guess this kind of condradicts my earlier speculation.
 
In that particular case, you created the engine failure by closing the throttle. Had you opened the throttle again and resupplied the engine with fuel and air, you may have experienced a restart. By applying carburetor heat with full power for ten or fifteen seconds prior to power reduction, you would have avoided the situation).

The most conducive condition to the formation of ice is when the airflow is highest and the temp drop the greatest; high power settings (for venturi icing). Icing with the throttle completely closed occurs adjacent and just downstream of the throttle plate as the gap between the plate and wall is blocked, and the idle jet is occluded.

Generally speaking, idle descents in a piston airplane are bad form.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom