Guesswork, guesswork, guesswork.
One more time for the dense and deaf: it has nothing to do with IFR/VFR. It's not a TERPs issue. The NOTAM specifically identified an airport design criteria, as previously identified, with references provided. You can view the advisory circular yourself which outlines it, and it's got all the information you need.
The Airport Classification with respect to design criteria specifies to properties of the aircraft intended to use the field. The classification represents the largest aircraft with respect to speed (A, B, C, etc), and wingspan (I, II, III, etc) expected to use that airfield, and the airfield is designed to meet the needs of those aircraft.
In the case of the NOTAM, a restriction is placed on the aircraft that can use the field, referencing the Airport Reference Code...which is detailed in the AC previously cited.
What you don't have is an approach or terminal procedure restriction. What you don't have is a VFR restriction. What you don't have is an IFR restriction. Going to other approach plates to come up with an answer to your guesswork will net you exactly squat...because the approach plates and instrument flight rules in general have nothing to do with the restriction at Eagle. It's an Airport Reference Code.
Again, the speed of the aircraft does correspond to approach speeds used in defining instrument approaches, but only coincidentally...because it's two different subjects. Airport Classification Code regards designing airport, and IFR approach categories regard flying procedures. The NOTAM is not referencing an IFR approach category, but an airport design criteria.
One more time for the dense and deaf: it has nothing to do with IFR/VFR. It's not a TERPs issue. The NOTAM specifically identified an airport design criteria, as previously identified, with references provided. You can view the advisory circular yourself which outlines it, and it's got all the information you need.
The Airport Classification with respect to design criteria specifies to properties of the aircraft intended to use the field. The classification represents the largest aircraft with respect to speed (A, B, C, etc), and wingspan (I, II, III, etc) expected to use that airfield, and the airfield is designed to meet the needs of those aircraft.
In the case of the NOTAM, a restriction is placed on the aircraft that can use the field, referencing the Airport Reference Code...which is detailed in the AC previously cited.
What you don't have is an approach or terminal procedure restriction. What you don't have is a VFR restriction. What you don't have is an IFR restriction. Going to other approach plates to come up with an answer to your guesswork will net you exactly squat...because the approach plates and instrument flight rules in general have nothing to do with the restriction at Eagle. It's an Airport Reference Code.
Again, the speed of the aircraft does correspond to approach speeds used in defining instrument approaches, but only coincidentally...because it's two different subjects. Airport Classification Code regards designing airport, and IFR approach categories regard flying procedures. The NOTAM is not referencing an IFR approach category, but an airport design criteria.
