BoilerUP
Citation style...
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2003
- Posts
- 5,311
Did my COM multi add-on in a Seminole, then did my MEI in a Seneca I about a year later. The Seneca is a piece of cake to fly, but even on a standard day, it won't climb single engine with 2 160lb pilots and full tanks. Its also relatively slow, at a 155-160kt cruise at typical power settings. IMO, it was a great airplane to do MEI training in, as SE ops were cake and it flew like the big dump truck any 6 place, straight wing Piper does.
The Seminole flew like a twin Arrow IV. The elevator isn't as powerful as a Dutchess so I often used the electric trim to help me flare, but that was initial multi training. I always managed to land it well, and its systems are very simple and straightforward. Easy, easy multi airplane to learn in, and quite forgiving.
I've never flown a Dutchess, so I can't comment about it.
I'd say fly whichever one is cheapest, but keep in mind you might pay a bit more for a FBO/flying club airplane, but you'll more than likely be checked out to rent it once you get your rating. Which is more than can be said for ATP. This is why I did my MEI training at an FBO, and it only cost me about $100 more.
The Seminole flew like a twin Arrow IV. The elevator isn't as powerful as a Dutchess so I often used the electric trim to help me flare, but that was initial multi training. I always managed to land it well, and its systems are very simple and straightforward. Easy, easy multi airplane to learn in, and quite forgiving.
I've never flown a Dutchess, so I can't comment about it.
I'd say fly whichever one is cheapest, but keep in mind you might pay a bit more for a FBO/flying club airplane, but you'll more than likely be checked out to rent it once you get your rating. Which is more than can be said for ATP. This is why I did my MEI training at an FBO, and it only cost me about $100 more.