HSDriver
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2004
- Posts
- 148
If you're going to give someone a hard time about his phraseology, you better make sure you get it right yourself!!! I don't think the FAA has ever used the term "untowered", and they have used the term uncontrolled in the past. I can find references to "non-towered", which is what I think you were trying to say. Anyway, enough of that...
While the AIM is a useful document, it is not the only document we should be referencing. I did a quick search and found AC90-66A. Among other things, it says:
"The FAA encourages pilots to use the standard traffic pattern. However, for those pilots who choose to execute a straight-in approach, maneuvering for and execution of the approach should be completed so as not to disrupt the flow of arriving and departing traffic. Therefore, pilots operating in the traffic pattern should be alert at all times to aircraft executing straight-in approaches."
I believe the FAA's current stance on straight in approaches is that while they don't specifically condone them, they recognize that they may be "operationally advantageous" for some operations.
Greg
Well said. I'm done with this thread now.