C
C17CHS
Delta's CEO likes to mention at every opportunity how the proposed merger is "end-to-end" and will not result in the layoff of front-line employees. Perhaps this is the case at mainline (for a while), but what about at the regional level?
To play devil's advocate, let's say Delta and Northwest have customers in Chattanooga that want to travel to New York on May 27th. Delta has 6 regional flights that feed ATL on that date and NW has 3 flights into MEM. Why maintain the duplication? Why would they not want to eliminate some of the duplicate flights and perhaps substitute a larger aircraft on one or more of the runs, either alternating flights to ATL and MEM, or just feeding one hub?
How do you see this merger playing out at the regional level and what's the likely impact for the players involved?
To play devil's advocate, let's say Delta and Northwest have customers in Chattanooga that want to travel to New York on May 27th. Delta has 6 regional flights that feed ATL on that date and NW has 3 flights into MEM. Why maintain the duplication? Why would they not want to eliminate some of the duplicate flights and perhaps substitute a larger aircraft on one or more of the runs, either alternating flights to ATL and MEM, or just feeding one hub?
How do you see this merger playing out at the regional level and what's the likely impact for the players involved?