Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But not in the spirit of this thread. Now to get back to the point, is there something that can be done in terms of revising union contracts to reverse the effects?The same group that lobbied for age 65, did nothing to help pass the law when they were on the bottom of the seniority list years ago.
Hypocritical? I think so.
But not in the spirit of this thread. Now to get back to the point, is there something that can be done in terms of revising union contracts to reverse the effects?
With the elimination of the A plans, do we really need to change anything in the contracts other than pay and the DC contribution?
Without the A plan, there is no penalty for retirement before 60 or after 60. You go when you have had enough of this torture.
I don't agree on this point. The legislation does not allow those to fly airline beyond Age 65. There is nothing in the rule requiring the airline to retain those above any lesser age.IIRC, the age 65 change here in the US was LEGISLATED in Congress. Any contract REQUIRING pilots to retire earlier than this would most likely be considered illegal.