Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Your 2 cents are worthless.ilinipilot said:I hope DL doesnt want us, then we can take away their 170 b/c every other airline would pick them up in a heartbeat. If DL wants to give away agreat plane and product more power to them. I cant wait to see pax reaction when they get to the gate in CLE and see a 700 waiting to take them on their 4 hour trip to SLC.
I actually had a pax in CLE ask me is this plane is the 170 he heard about, i told him yest and he said how excited he was about flying on it, and he has heard great things about it.
just my 2 cents
This is not the problem with the SA DL flying. The problem is everything is blocked incorrectly. 4 hours for DTW-SLC when the flight time is 4+10 is not going to help our on-time performance.EMB170Pilot said:I guess we are going to have to do what we did with United when we got the 170s for them under chautauqua. It worked with United b/c we were threaten to lose the united flying because our on time perf was horrible. Turns out the real reason was b/c we had to call 10 times for paperwork...5 times for fuel and 3 or 4 times for catering. once we had documented proof of this...United shut their pie holes! I am sure we will start doing the same for Delta but at least its great now we can clock out on time now with this new upload.
B.C you dont have a base in SLC, and thus cant have anyone there standing by to fly it.SlapShot said:Your 2 cents are worthless.
This is not the problem with the SA DL flying. The problem is everything is blocked incorrectly. 4 hours for DTW-SLC when the flight time is 4+10 is not going to help our on-time performance.
Plus having the maintenance spare in CMH when almost everything goes in and out of SLC does not make much sense to me. Why not put the spare in SLC?
TH45 said:soon enough 190's for 50 seat pay it never ends... we are ruining our future IMHO