OK, so as a furloughee with only 1 3/4 years on the property, you receoved everything you had coming to you from UAL's pension. Guys that were on the property longer (and hence had much invested into the plan) got much more when they were furloughed. So you're going to have to explain to me how the UAL furloughee's "got a screw job" (your words) comparable to a retiree or worst than a non-furloughed guy when they had the opportunity to take out 100% the pension money they had vs. a guy who stayed on the property and counldn't take out ANY of his money and will only get a fraction of what is due him through his portion of the 550M bond? I can see someone being of the opinion of a retiree getting screwed, but I'm not seeing the furloughed guy getting screwed out of his pension in this scenario. Yes, the furloughee lost his job unfortunately, but that has nothing to do with the bond distribution.Andy said:That amounted to around $2400 for me. On property for 1 3/4 years.
Last edited: