Dizel8,
Thanks for coming into the fray. You know that we pilots do not control the flight attendant jumpseats, and we just got our own jumpseats in '96. As far as unlimited jumpseats, I believe we did bargain for that and I will check into that. We gave them a billion a year for 5 years, so I hope so. But, we have stated that we will get CASS. Have you guys started that program yet? Maybe you have.
Russ,
Again, you haven't addressed my question----is it fair to Skywest and Delta jumpseaters that we cannot sit in every one of your Skywest jumpseats (in the cockpit), while any one of your pilots from any base flying any feed for any airline (UA, CO) can sit in our cockpit? That is the crux of my argument. I know that you guys can provide unlimited jumpseats in the back, and I can use my PPR card to sit in the back too without asking you. My problem (or beef) is with the cockpit---since a lot of your flights are full (you have smaller aircraft).
Ok, so I will answer your questions so I can win. If I were a SW pilot, I would think your deal is better currently, until we get that program set up (with AA and SW initially) to verify employment. Then our program would be preferable. Second, why should we get the jumpseat on the United side? Well, I would think any United pilot should get that seat first, since you are providing feed for them. I can understand that. ASA and Comair pilots get our seat first--since our company owns them, and then other DCI carriers get it next. But, if there is no United guy present, then I would think that we should be allowed in your United RJ cockpit if the back is full. Calling your dispatcher should have done the trick--since they probably have a computer that could verify employment. If not, then why should we allow a guy in DEN commuting home to SLC a ride when he just finished a bunch of United legs? Is that a double standard? I think it is. Answer my questions or I win. Tell me why it isn't a double standard. Are we just being super duper nice?
Bye Bye--General Lee