Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

DELTA fact or fiction.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Regarding furloughs I would say it depends. Mergers have been talked about for a long time now. I think they will happen in the next 18 to 24 months or less. Whether there are furloughs for a given merger depends primarily on route overlap proximity of hubs/focus cities, and what kinds of route/asset sales occur. For example a Delta/United merger has a much higher chance of creating furloughs than Delta/NWA. This is due to route overlap and proximity of hubs (ie DEN/SLC). A Delta/NWA merger has relatively little overlap and the route network could be tweaked with minor reductions. One other factor is strategic growth plans going forward. If the new combined airline has plans to open up new territory this obviously works to the benefit of the pilots of those two airlines producing growth while reducing the chances for furloughs.
 
What capacity cuts? If any major cuts capacity, then a LCC will fill the void, and become larger. That would be feeding your competitor. For a merger to make sense, it would have to be almost seemless, like the USAir and AWA merger(operationally, not seniority wise). No hubs were closed, and no additional pilots were furloughed. If you are talking about NWA and Delta, there would probably have to be fences created, like only NWA pilots flying their 744s for 5 years etc. At the same time, only NWA pilots can fly their DC9s, and if they are parked, those pilots go to Compass. Fences can work both ways. Also, there is no guarantee that there will be any mergers this year. High oil may force some smaller LCCs to look at each other, but most of the legacies can weather this storm if they have strong INTL routes that help back up the softer domestic side.


Bye Bye--General Lee


General,

Great is your faith in the legacy international market. But on March 30, 2008 and continuing in the not so distant future... heavy foreign domestic/INTERNATIONAL competition to our airline industry will be a reality. You talk about DAL but last I checked VA, BMI, RYAN air, Lufthansa, emirates etc... are planning to make their presence known in these United States .... and some of these airlines DO NOT have to worry about high oil prices...

In terms of gaining market control in an extreme competitive industry, mergers do make sense...

... how will OPEN SKIES, AGE 65, and flat domestic markets affect legacies like DAL and even LCC's?
 
G.L.

Since growth is of a 'give-and-take' design, do you foresee the possiblity of furloughs if some of these recently opened, or yet to be opened, international routes are unprofitable, and have to be closed down?
 
You talk about DAL but last I checked VA, BMI, RYAN air, Lufthansa, emirates etc... are planning to make their presence known in these United States .... and some of these airlines DO NOT have to worry about high oil prices...

Do they burn a different kind of fuel? :rolleyes:
 
Open Skies will have an impact just as NAFTA. South of the border drivers moving cargo throughout the US. Imagine a pilot from say (insert country) flying a widebody to the US, then picking up passengers in NYC and flying them on to LA? He might be quite underpaid in our terms, but in his country he may be a king earning a lot of loot.
 
Don't worry. Convert our pay to Euros and see the result.

We ARE the low cost foriegn competition.
 
Don't worry. Convert our pay to Euros and see the result.

We ARE the low cost foriegn competition.
True, but compares to pilots in many other countries, we are far more expensive. Pilots in Russia are dirt poor and many of them work second jobs to get by. Some countries south of our borders pay their pilots well, but others pay them much worse than us. It's a mixed bag. If true open skies were to become a reality, it would certainly be something to worry about.
 
Burn the same fuel.... But companies like EMIRATES don't burn the same MONEY for fuel. I think they pay like .30/gallon. While we pay 2.00 and higher for fuel...

Really, so when they buy their fuel in JFK they only pay the fuelers there 30 cents a gallon? Do they pay the equivalent of 30 cents a gallon at Heathrow also?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top