Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Delta and the new 7E7--interesting.....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

General Lee

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 24, 2002
Posts
20,442
Please read this article, and tell me why Delta would be already looking at a new aircraft while still asking for major paycuts. Maybe because they want them to pay for the new planes.



7E7 Watch
Boeing getting airlines' feedback

By Melissa Allison
Chicago Tribune


It has been touted as a revolutionary product for a faltering industry. A sketch depicts it flying above majestic clouds. And it carries a dreamy name.
Aside from that, few details are available regarding the 7E7 Dreamliner, Boeing's latest plan for a new passenger jet.

Boeing has used a broad brush to describe its vision of a superefficient jet, using 15 to 20 percent less fuel than the current generation of wide-body jets, and seating 200 to 250 passengers.

Airlines love the concept, and Boeing is working with about 40 of them worldwide to determine aspects of the 7E7 such as its seat configuration, cockpit design and how far it will fly.

Some major airlines are barely participating in the discussions, preoccupied at the moment with survival.

"It's difficult to get airlines to really talk about specific demands when their very business models are under question," said Richard Aboulafia, aerospace analyst at the Teal Group.

Other airlines take Boeing's interest in feedback to heart. Perhaps the most vocal participant in the 7E7 arena is Gordon Bethune, chief executive of Continental Airlines and a former Boeing executive.

What Bethune wants most is a standardized airplane instead of models highly customized to suit airlines. A common airplane would cost less, would cut pilot training costs because of standardized cockpits and could make financing less risky because many airlines would be flying the same standardized plane, he figures.

Bethune said Boeing has done a good job of listening to its customers, but airlines "were kind of stupid in asking Boeing to do things that don't add value and drive up costs."

Boeing executives say they plan to minimize choices on the 7E7. For example, there will not be 50 offerings for cup holders in the cockpits of the 7E7, as there are on some Boeing jets. And the 7E7 is expected to have just one type of landing gear.

But Boeing is not making a one-size-fits-all airplane.




After talking to Asian carriers, which often make short hops within countries, Boeing is considering making a shorter-range version of the 7E7. Current plans call for a long-range jet, flying up to 8,000 nautical miles.

A shorter-range 7E7 would appeal to discount carrier ATA Airlines, said founder and chief executive George Mikelsons. But if a long-range version is all Boeing produces, "if we fall in love and find the costs are low, we will construct routes that fit the airplane," he said.

ATA's discussions with Boeing have been few and informal, Mikelsons said, probably because ATA is a small carrier.

Delta Air Lines, on the other hand, has had several meetings with Boeing executives regarding the 7E7. It is considered a potentially key customer for the new plane, which is expected to be roughly comparable in size to the many 767s Delta flies on short- and long-range flights. Boeing hopes to offer that flexibility in the 7E7.

Delta has talked to Boeing about everything from entertainment systems to range capabilities to the value of having sensors that would determine the structural health of the airplane. Some of the concepts are brought by Boeing. Others come from Delta.

"We've been pretty vocal on what the cockpit needs to look like. A huge cost for airlines is pilot training, and this airplane needs to be identical to the 777 cockpit," said John Burtz, who runs aircraft acquisition and sales for Delta.

That would make cross-training pilots for the two types of planes easier and less expensive, Burtz said. Delta prefers the 777 cockpit because it is one of the most advanced in the world, and 777 pilots would be paid roughly the same as 7E7 pilots.

The one item that is non-

negotiable for the 7E7 is its efficiency, Burtz said. He has been told that overall operating costs for the 7E7 should be 20 percent below the costs of Delta's existing planes.

"If they're able to hit a 20 percent reduction, that's going to be pretty dramatic," he said. "They've been told by all the airlines that if they get 6 or 7 percent better than existing airplanes, they probably need to go back and scrub it again."


Bye Bye--General Lee


:rolleyes: :cool: :cool:
 
The Dreamliner

It's sort of like getting invited to the North American Auto Show in Detroit, and walking around looking at the new upcoming cars. Then you realize, there's no WAY I could afford one of those puppies right now, but it was sure fun to see what they looked like.....maybe someday.

I suppose Delta is just "browsing", just like about everybody else right now. Never hurts to "dream" anyhow.
 
It's just sales talk.... You always have reps from one company or another making sales calls. That is where all theese fun rumors come from!

--03M
 
Coopdog,

I doubt Southwest is getting 7E7's anytime soon, huh? As I remember it, Southwest was the one who was very vocal about the 737-700/800 upper panel, and ruined it for everyone else. The push button upper panel on the 757/767 and the EICAS is a lot better than the switches and recall buttons on the 738---I've flown both. I think the airline with the most say will form the cockpit to their liking---just like Southwest did with the 737NG.

Bye Bye--General Lee:cool: :rolleyes: ;)
 
Last edited:
[QUOTE from General Lee]
"Please read this article, and tell me why Delta would be already looking at a new aircraft while still asking for major paycuts. Maybe because they want them to pay for the new planes."

Why bother posting this article with the above request if you're going to get touchy about a legitimate response? I believe the "dream" reference was to the name "Dreamliner".
 
Last edited:
General:

I have to agree with you. Legend has it that a few folks at our school-house demanded that Boeing configure our NG (700s) to look/function like the 200. They went so far as to request (demand) the EFIS presentation be in the 'round dial format'. Essentially, you loose the trend lines and functionality of tapes not to mention the ND is partially taken up with a IVSI and ALT.

If you've had the pleasure of flying the 200 (or God forbid the 100 like I did) and one of the NG 737, you might come to conclusion that only thing common between the classic and NGs is that they both burn Jet-A and that's about it.

I personally like the dark overhead concept that we had on the MD-11. The Gens came on line after completing their internal checks, the HYD pumps cycled between primary and secondary and then came on line, the fuel pumps did their magic all without me screwing anything while flipping switches.

During my last PC I got to meet the new Director of Training and I came away believing that we will be using more of the automation available.
 
Looseca,

I don't know what you are referring to? I was not trying to slam anyone. I was miffed at the upper panel on the 737-800, which is supposed to have the "NG" or New Generation equipment, which in actuality-- is "LG" or Last Generation. I wasn't the one who designed it or made someone else design it. Overall it was a nice plane, though.

PSL,

Yes, I flew the 737-200 round dials at Express for 1 year(after my 727FE stint), and then went to the 737-800. It was a big change, and the school was long. After flying the 757/767, which has "older" technology, I find that I like the push button and EICAS system better. If you have flown jumpseat in the 777, you can really see what a Next Generation airplane cockpit looks like, with equipment like a mouse for the computerized checklist. Maybe someday I will be able to fly one of those too.

Bye Bye--General Lee :cool: :rolleyes:
 
Flychicaga,

There is no doubt that Southwest wanted the 737NG to be closer to their 737-300 and 737-200 aircraft, and since they were the ones with the largest order at the time, they got what they wanted. I was told this many many times during my 737-800 ground school and subsequent sim training at Delta. They were miffed at the older "Last Generation" or LG avionics, even though the 757/767 was older than the 737NGs and had better equipment---EICAS etc. Look at the timeline---it doesn't make sense. The 757 was made prior to the 737NG, and it has a nicer and more advanced package. (upper panel and EICAS system which states the problems, instead of a recall panel that has a light that states where the problem might be on the upper panel)But hey, Southwest was making a huge order, and Boeing sold out the better technology. My point is that Delta hopefully will do the same thing with the B7E7. (This may occur after we all take HUGE pay cuts, right??)

Bye Bye--General Lee:cool:
 
Bethune himself takes credit for the 737NG upper panel in his book, "From Worst to First." He claims that it didn't pass his "Seat 9A Test," in that if you asked the passenger in seat 9A if he'd like to pay for a new upper panel if the the old one was safe, would he? Well no, obviously, and thus Bethune proudly stakes his claim on the legacy panel.
 
Cardinal,

That would be funny, since Bethuse used to be in charge of the 757/767 program at Boeing. He obviously would have known the difference in technology. I am biased because I have flown both and like the 757/767 package better. I can see why others would like to have a common upper panel for training etc.., though.

Bye Bye--General Lee:cool: :rolleyes:
 
FlyChicaga:

I believe the reason the final B738 product rolled out with the older style overhead panel was so the aircraft could be flown with a common type rating between it's Classic counterparts. If it would have had an overhead panel similar to the B757/767, it would have required a whole new type rating.

That's not necessarily true. The DC-9/MD-80/MD-90/B717 is all the same type rating and the overhead panel on the 717 versus the DC-9 is vastly different. Further the overhead panel on the MD-90 versus the MD-90EFD is vastly different.

As for that last bit. It was Delta who changed the push button dark cockpit concept panel of the MD-90 into the switch panel one that ended up being built for everyone other than Saudi Arabian. Delta wanted the airplane to have minimal differences training from the MD-88.


Typhoonpilot
 
Prediction:

DL is the US launch. Why... 737-800 Short to Medium. 7E7 Medium to Long Haul. RJs for everywhere else.

They've been headed this way for a long time. Give 'em 10 years and the transition will be complete.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top