nosehair
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2003
- Posts
- 1,238
One Little Thing.
I just want to jump in here to try to "squelch" a common misunderstanding in this CFI business. The Student is NOT - repeat - NOT "flying on your ticket".
He is if you didn't properly train him. If you just get him proficient enough to fly around the pattern solo with insufficient training to handle the unusual stuff, then he is on your ticket. And I'm not saying I haven't done that - I think we all have - but if it is documented, by way of a presolo knowledge test or other documentation, that he knows not to fly formation, then HE IS RESPONSIBLE.
That is the main point I want to share. When you endorse a student for solo, you are saying he has all the skill and knowledge to fly around within a 25 mile radius any time without your permission. Students who are required to get permission or authorization for each flight don't develop a sense of command authority. They, and the instructor, develop this attitude that the student's mistakes become the instructors. Not so, unless the instructor is not teaching all the required knowledge and skill.
I always tell new instructors, when they sign off a student for solo, they should treat it exactly like the student has his own airplane and can go fly whenever he wants, with no furthur supervision. That is what the FAR's say.
Sure, the FAA will ask some questions of a CFI when a student violates an FAR, but only to determine that the required training did occur. As long as all training listed in 61.87 has been done, the FAA has no reason or authority to initiate action on a CFI.
I just want to jump in here to try to "squelch" a common misunderstanding in this CFI business. The Student is NOT - repeat - NOT "flying on your ticket".
He is if you didn't properly train him. If you just get him proficient enough to fly around the pattern solo with insufficient training to handle the unusual stuff, then he is on your ticket. And I'm not saying I haven't done that - I think we all have - but if it is documented, by way of a presolo knowledge test or other documentation, that he knows not to fly formation, then HE IS RESPONSIBLE.
That is the main point I want to share. When you endorse a student for solo, you are saying he has all the skill and knowledge to fly around within a 25 mile radius any time without your permission. Students who are required to get permission or authorization for each flight don't develop a sense of command authority. They, and the instructor, develop this attitude that the student's mistakes become the instructors. Not so, unless the instructor is not teaching all the required knowledge and skill.
I always tell new instructors, when they sign off a student for solo, they should treat it exactly like the student has his own airplane and can go fly whenever he wants, with no furthur supervision. That is what the FAR's say.
Sure, the FAA will ask some questions of a CFI when a student violates an FAR, but only to determine that the required training did occur. As long as all training listed in 61.87 has been done, the FAA has no reason or authority to initiate action on a CFI.